It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Normally, religious fanatic, anti-choicers (not "pro-life" since most support war and the death penalty) are unable to keep their opinions and condemnation to themselves. It's physically impossible for them. But, as time marches on and the masses move away from religious extremism, their influence diminishes further and further, and they get louder and louder in their death throes. Just ignore them.
There are many stages of fetal development, and I believe if somebody is going to terminate their pregnancy, it's a decision that should be made as early as possible. Late term abortions should be very rare. For barrier breakage, and rape, the morning after pill is an option that would prevent a child from forming at all. Perhaps one day, instead of shouting at people, and wasting their breath expecting others to see things their way, anti-choicers can come up with another option. Perhaps they can put all that energy into figuring out a way to extract a developing fetus alive, and transferring it into an artificial womb of some sort. In such a program the woman would remain completely anonymous. Perhaps we can couple that with a space exploration program, in which we could find and colonize other supportive planets since we already have a population problem here.
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
You do realize that your euphemisms and labels are showing right? You are not at all concerned with rational discourse you just want to appeal to the emotions of your unsuspecting prey. You sir are misinformed and predatory.
This is about reasonable, rational, logical discourse among informed individuals, and we are all willing participants, you dont have to post here. If you are so pro choice then why don't you allow me the freedom of conscience and liberty to engage in this discussion and debate?
So through your actions you are showing that you are not not pro-choice, and since you think it is ok to arbitrarily decide that it is acceptable to murder a generation of 65+ Million unborn babies in the name of recreational sex, godlessness, and hedonism, to perpetuate a culture of death and corruption, so you are not pro-life either. So what are you?
Although I haven't seen much rational, logical discourse coming from the "genocide" and "baby killer" camp
Originally posted by MindSpin
Well aren't you full of assumptions. Since he was talking to me...and you replied to him...I must assume that you are refering to me. Follow that?
There are many stages of HUMAN development...fetus being one...infant being another...toddler..."child"...adolescent...young adult...adult...elderly. You seem to discriminate against the very young...I don't.
Did you just suggest to ship babies off to another planet???
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
You do realize that your euphemisms and labels are showing right? You are not at all concerned with rational discourse you just want to appeal to the emotions of your unsuspecting prey. You sir are misinformed and predatory.
Wow. I thought I was just expressing my opinion.
This is about reasonable, rational, logical discourse among informed individuals, and we are all willing participants, you dont have to post here. If you are so pro choice then why don't you allow me the freedom of conscience and liberty to engage in this discussion and debate?
Although I haven't seen much rational, logical discourse coming from the "genocide" and "baby killer" camp, I never once said you shouldn't be permitted to engage in the discussion. I make the personal choice to ignore all the emotional exaggeration, others are free to let it bother them all they want. I am so pro choice.
So through your actions you are showing that you are not not pro-choice, and since you think it is ok to arbitrarily decide that it is acceptable to murder a generation of 65+ Million unborn babies in the name of recreational sex, godlessness, and hedonism, to perpetuate a culture of death and corruption, so you are not pro-life either. So what are you?
I'm a little bit of both.
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
Abortion is morally unacceptable.
They will say its not alive I'll say there is absolutely cellular growth and development which is biological criteria for one of the subjective aspects of life. If its not alive when does it become 'alive'?
I have many more arguments too, but lets start here, or are you not up to logical discourse?
You may be trying to dance around it, but I'm quite sure you're a religious extremist.
I'm just rational, and understand during early development there is no self-aware, feeling human being. There is a mass of cells forming into one.
I know to you religious freaks, every sperm has a soul, and that's fine. You do the right thing by your god, and don't get an abortion.
Well, wouldn't that be better than "murdering" them? Hell, I think that would be pretty cool. We need to do something with this exploding population, or NONE of our children will have enough to eat or drink. Is that such a hard concept to grasp? Over population, look it up. We need to find other planets with more resources.
Originally posted by 27jd
reply to post by MindSpin
Okay, I get what you're saying. So, do you feel that human life is more 'sacred' than other life? Do you eat meat? Although even plants are "alive". Just as alive as the mass of cells developing when a sperm fertilizes an egg.
Ill give you a hint, you're supposed to attack on of the premises.
Originally posted by 27jd
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
Abortion is morally unacceptable.
To you. So, don't get one.
They will say its not alive I'll say there is absolutely cellular growth and development which is biological criteria for one of the subjective aspects of life. If its not alive when does it become 'alive'?
Athletes foot fungus is cellular growth and development, better wage a moral war on tough actin' Tinactin.
Well, you're argument, like the poster aboves argument, seems based on the premise that human life is more sacred than other life. I don't see it that way, all life is alive, and all life will die, one way or the other. That's the way it is on this earth, life lives, and it dies, for various reasons. We raise, and murder animals to eat them, or for their fur. Many mothers miscarry, at various stages in their pregnancies as well. Just cuz a sperm fertilized an egg, doesn't mean anything is a given.
Originally posted by MindSpin
Quite sure huh??? Would you please share you logic with me as to how you came to that brilliant conclusion?
I'm going to ask you for proof of how you measure self-awareness and "feeling". The funny thing is...I know your answer to this...but let's go through the whole process.
I don't believe any sperm has a "soul"...in fact I have never said one word about a "soul" in this whole thread. I mass murder sperm often...and I use contraception...soooooooo...you are looking kind of foolish in your assumptions.
Overpopulation...I'm familiar with that myth that has been ongoing for the past what...100 years now???
Originally posted by Darkmask
reply to post by geekyone
A baby doesn't NEED to be breast fed, an embryo needs to live off of a woman's body. Sorry your statement fails
Yeah, quite sure. You haven't stated that you're not religious. If you're not, just say so and I'll eat my crow. And I'm sure we won't come to an agreement on what makes somebody an extremist, so no point in trying to argue your level of religious devotion.
Originally posted by mrphilosophias
Religion has nothing to do with the argument at this point, as we have not invoked God or Religion in our arguments.
However if you want to bring God up then sure yeah I'll bite. Abortion is from the pits of hell.