It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aeons
reply to post by Pimander
I had no idea that being logical was the same as being hateful. Can you expand upon that?
Originally posted by Aeons
For the contention of the OP to be testable you have to ASSUME that everything in your post MUST be true. However, it isn't in any way proved. It isn't even beyond being imagined.
Originally posted by Slipdig1
Are now you got it right. It is a hypothesis, yes and a good one. It is not a theory. There is a big difference.
Theory: a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
dictionary.reference.com...
Hypothesis: a proposition assumed as a premise in an argument.
dictionary.reference.com...
A saurian scientist finds the remains of a Voyager crewman who died on the planet where the crew was exiled by the Kazon during the two-part episode "Basics". An analysis of the remains' DNA shows links to his own DNA. While tracking and studying the Voyager crew, the scientist and his aide are discovered; they eventually pool their knowledge and conclude that the saurian is an evolved dinosaur from a species that left Earth more than 65 million years earlier. The scientist is thrilled to be able to prove his Distant Origin theory (that his saurian race originated elsewhere in the galaxy), but the rulers of his society place him on trial for heresy against the doctrinal teachings of their heritage, the central tenet being that they originated in the Delta Quadrant. The outcome of that trial threatens the Voyager crew as well.
Originally posted by Sn0MaN
I've actually theorized this myself. Just because dinosaurs have been extinct for some
time now, who's to say that they were not intelligent beings? Another theory that I've had
for a while and is becoming more widespread with newly discovered evidence is, how do we
know they were even covered in scales? If anything, I believe that most prehistoric dinosaurs
were covered in feathers. Their skeletal remains even look more like modern day birds, than
they do reptiles. We have proof today that the DNA found in chickens can be genetically
altered to grow scales or feathers, depending on how the cellular DNA is manipulated. Also,
look at ancient "Gods" like Quetzalcoatl, who was supposedly a feathered reptilian. History
also refers to "Giants" that lived among us. I can think of no better evidence than dinosaur
bones as proof that giants did roam the earth.edit on 2/22/2011 by Sn0MaN because: grammar
Originally posted by Aeons
You've presumed that your original hypothesis is correct, and then added further story upon it to make it seem like truth.
Originally posted by Jericho-X
This reminds me of an Star Trek Voyger episode, can't remember which episode or season.
Originally posted by TheAnuraOne
I think the lady at the end nailed it when she said that it is rather arrogant to think that the endpoint of evolution is the human being. I could not have said it better.
Originally posted by jonnywhite
I'm aware that being the most evolved does not mean being the most intelligent. If I recall, monkeys are more evolved than we're. But we're more intelligent....(snip)...But you would expect that, on average, more evolved life would have a few examples of very intelligent life. And, more likely, that life is older than us.
Originally posted by connorromanow
reply to post by Pimander
I have heard this theory before but there are several arguments saying thatall animals evolving to become a hmanoid body form being the ideal stage for advanced intelligance is a very old way or self centered veiws of evolutionary thinking.
Originally posted by Pimander
....I do not see why any of that would mean there is not a good chance a bipedal (many dinosaurs were bipedal) large brained (there brain size relative to their bodies has been shown to have got greater through time), linguistically advanced (birds came from them) dinosaur with an opposable thumb (we know some had them) could have evolved.
Evolution frequently finds similar ways to adapt to the same environmental challenges. A good example is the number of traits sharks and dolphins share. Sharks evolved from a fish and dolphins evolved from a dog like mammal. They have adapted to their environment in similar ways despite starting from completely different places.edit on 21/2/11 by Pimander because: (no reason given)
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by Slipdig1
reply to post by Pimander
As far as I have been told the most popular belief is that Dinosaurs are or were cold-blooded. This makes it hard for them to go under ground if they need sun.
Originally posted by Charizard
I first heard this theory on an episode of Star Trek Voyager where they encountered a race of "dinosapians" and learned that they originated from Earth as well. It was probably one of my favorite episodes of the entire series because the concept was so intriguing to me. In the grand scheme of things, humans seemed to have evolved rather quickly, so it doesn't seem impossible that another species could have evolved to the same level of intelligence that we are currently at, or beyond, before the human race was ever around.
However, there are just too many questions that bother me. Look at how our species has dominated the entire planet. Nearly every where you look, except in the most remote of places, you see evidence of our existance. Our garbage litters the land, our roads and power lines and subway systems snake all over the planet; our satellites and space junk fill the sky; our monuments (like Mt. Rushmore) leave rather permanent reminders of our existence behind.
I do realize that after millions of years, our buildings would crumble, our bridges would corrode and collapse, our cities would be swallowed up by vegetation and our scars on the land would be weathered away...however, surely there would be SOMETHING left behind from another advanced civilization. Remnants of wiring or bottles or what-have-you, things that do not easily corrode or degrade, underground bunkers...I just can't believe that we haven't found any remnants of another technologically-advanced civilization. More over, where is the fossil evidence? Hundreds and hundreds of species of dinosaurs have been found. Millions of fossils. Yet there seem to be no fossils of these "evolved" species which, having been a species advanced enough to leave the planet, surely would have colonized the entire Earth and possibly our neighboring moon as well. No fossil evidence of the end result, or the transition from simple dinosaur to advanced, anthropomorphic, intelligent species.
It is a really fun and thought-provoking theory, but the evidence which should be present if such a situation really existed seems to be incredibly lacking.