It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Recoil Energy of 257 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 13 fps.
Recoil Energy of 6 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 7 fps.
Recoil Energy of 38 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 14 fps.
Originally posted by MMPI2
I used the recoil calculator here:
www.beartoothbullets.com...
and plugged in the values listed above to obtain the following recoil figures for the .950 and obtained the following...
Recoil Energy of 257 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 13 fps.
Comparatively, an 8 lb. 30/06 firing a 150 gr. bullet at 2700 fps yielded the following:
Recoil Energy of 6 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 7 fps.
Also, just for giggles, i plugged in the numbers (500 gr bullet at 2400 fps out of a 12 lb rifle) for a 458 Win Mag and got...
Recoil Energy of 38 foot pounds, and Recoil Velocity of 14 fps.
So even with the massive weight of the .950, you're still generating approx. 6 x the ft lbs. of the .458 Winchester Magnum.
I read that they use a forward mounted scope on the .950 to help prevent damage to the shooter's ocular orbit because of the massive recoil.
It could be quite dangerous to fire.
Originally posted by FarArcher
While the muzzle velocity and muzzle energy are undoubtably massive, a cursory examination of the bullet itself would indicate that the ballistic coefficient/efficiency would be really poor.
At any significant target distance, this would become an artillery piece.
Lots of elevation!