It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by meathed
No it dosen't look like a smear in the shot to me.
Originally posted by polarwarrior
Originally posted by meathed
No it dosen't look like a smear in the shot to me.
No, it certainly does not look like a smear, why would you think it would?
Originally posted by meathed
reply to post by Travlla
Feral things DO need a bullet.
But whos to judge whos FERAL?
You or me?
edit on 9-3-2011 by meathed because: Me cant spell proper again
edit on 9-3-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Travlla
Originally posted by meathed
reply to post by Travlla
Feral things DO need a bullet.
But whos to judge whos FERAL?
You or me?
edit on 9-3-2011 by meathed because: Me cant spell proper again
edit on 9-3-2011 by meathed because: (no reason given)
The permit i have from DSE to hunt feral animals on crown land ,tells me what is classed as feral,
dogs
cats
goats
pigs
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by meathed
If you look at the picture, that black spot cannot be the nose, unless it is deformed and the muzzle juts out to the left. The perspective is all wrong. I thought at first it looked like a feline type animal, but the highlight on the top of the muzzle extends farther than what I assumed to be the nose.
Originally posted by Slipdig1
Notice the smaller nose of a younger fox.
Originally posted by Versa
I stand by my assertion that the foxes nose is just hidden for one reason or another and the grass is giving the optical illusion of a short snout.edit on 10/3/11 by Versa because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by heffo7
Well honestly, those two pictures make me think even more that the unknown is a fox. Why? Notice the black on the paws, the stance of both are similar(you have to be able to grasp perspective to compare them), and also note it is a different time of day that the two were taken( noted by the angle of light). Even on the obvious fox, the paw by the area of the unknown animal's snout was seems to be hidden pretty well, and that is with a lot of ambient light.
Originally posted by heffo7
MrX, my Yowie Hunter must be watching this thread. He has just sent me two more pictures... one is of the unknown creature and the other is of a fox TAKEN FROM THE SAME TRAILCAM taken the day before. You may have to scroll across to see them as I haven't altered the pictures at all. I haven't cropped them to fit.
Still think it's a fox??
edit on 10-3-2011 by heffo7 because: spelling... too excited by this new evidence!
Originally posted by heffo7
reply to post by meathed
Thank you! I don't know what it is either. I'm from this area where these pictures were taken and have spotlighted and shot many foxes over the years for their pelts.... but I have never seen this creature before!
And also thank you for being one other person that can see that the proportions just don't fit even though the colouring and markings are similar. Which is what I've been trying to point out all along, though obviously not as eloquently as I'd like.