The opinion of banned members has no worth?

reply to post by Jinglelord

I think if any explanation is offered for a banning it should be nothing more than a user name and the section of the T&C that was violated.

At least then people could get some closure. We don't need to have a discussion about it, just a reasonable explanation for why they were banned. It's pretty easy actually. And the reason I suspect it's not done is because some people are banned for reasons that aren't included in the T&C. And ATS staff can deny that all they want, but I know the truth of the matter.

Originally posted by masqua
If stars and flags were done away with, then there wouldn't be a problem. What's important is what is said.

If there's any facet of ATS which I believe is abused consistently, it's stars and flags.

But... that's just my opinion.

Out here in the perimeter there are no stars.
Out here, we are stone...immaculate.

morrison