The Moon is Artificial I can see the wierd structure with the telescope and camera clearly...bunker

Click here for more information.

reply to post by NorkiSpaceDuckYou just really don't get how this is supposed to work, do you? I've tried to help you out here and point you in the right direction to get your point across effectively, and yet you still revert to name calling et. al. I would attempt to explain it in simpler terms, but at this point, based on your current and past response patterns, I smell troll. You are obviously being willfully obtuse and belligerent. We've given you plenty of chances to clarify your point and to respond with coherent data, yet you consistently respond with the belligerent tantrums of a spoiled child. I could say more on the topic of your behavior, but I doubt it would help, so instead I'll simply wish you luck on your endeavor, whatever it actually is. You're obviously going to need it.

reply to post by On the level


I dunno man, This stuff doesnt sound his sorta style, Allthough in the past he has surprised me (Btw Bernard knows how to succesfully embed videos)


This is the Video that he cant seem to Embed By the way, Even though i showed him how too And took the time to help him succesfully post pretty much his entire thread:

To The OP, ATS is for debating Thoeries not slapping around oppinions

**** GET ON TOPIC ****

*** BE CIVIL, NO NAME CALLING ***

Originally posted by lewman
what a strange thought, we have paintings that are 100's of years old that show the moon so if it is artificial then it wasnt made by us, not unless we wherre travelling around through space in the times of plato et al.

Many ancient cultures and even the Bible (from what I've been told) speak of a time 'before' the Moon.

I feel in my deepest essence and almost like an understanding...that the Moon is most likely artificial.

Take Ingo Swann (remote viewer) who had no interest in aliens or UFOs or sci-fi who, RV'ed the Moon and saw Beings and Humans up there mining the Moon.

Why say that? If he truly didn't see it he'd keep his mouth shut because he jeopardized being deemed a kook!

I know Swann (and this whole 'Moon" thing) may be a little too esoteric and doubtful to many but I personally trust remote viewers way before I'd trust the 'official' word from the Powers That Be.

Originally posted by jpsdasnake



The Moon defines the night and day cicle because of its gravitational influence over the earth's rotation,causing the earth to rotate on a (aprox.)24 hours cycle.and that's what you call a "Day"

edit on 14/2/2011 by jpsdasnake because: added hyperlink

I am not alone in this theory but I think in time, science will realize the Moon has NOTHING to do with our gravity.
Earths core is what affects and defines gravity.

Because if you think about it, when the Moon is not above us (for 12 hours per day) how is it still affecting the tides? When the Moon is over Australia why does my ocean ebb and flow?


Like a magnetic and a piece of metal. If you remove the magnet or place it out of the metal's path, the metal WON'T move.

The Moon is very likely an artificial satellite and was place there for an agenda which I will not go into.

Native Indians spoke of Two Moons while others spoke of No Moon.

So, the Moon has not been a constant in Earth's history from what we can tell through written findings.

reply to post by Human_Alien


I just love to think The Moon = Deathstar.

reply to post by NorkiSpaceDuck


Greetings to you, NorkiSpaceDuck. A star and flag for the post, but I do wish you would postulate a little on your theory, surely the videos are not the only thing that convinced you that the Moon is an Artificial Body? Well, I think that too, but my theory is based on Astral Travelling to there over a period of several years. There is a system of crystalline based computers there, inside, and the Moon is made of metal. There is no life support there, and the small Grays seem to be attempting to get it started up again. Of course this is just my own hypothesis and theory, I have no evidence to back up my claim.

Originally posted by TedHodgson
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

I just love to think The Moon = Deathstar.

Nah, if anything Jupiter and/or Earth is (are)

When the Earth was Moonless
www.halexandria.org...


The Moon presents more questions/confusion than answers.

The Moon isn't left primarily to science. It's stuck into many religions so it'll never be debated. Humans can NOT change religion. We can change science to some degree but when it infringes on religion, scientists have to answer to the Elite!

Now look what the Vatican is doing about aliens! They are indoctrinating them into our 'belief' system (as of last year) probably because, they will be undeniable very soon.

But no one except the likes of 'conspiracy theorists' will go on record saying the Moon is artificial as of now. So I suggest we all start thinking outside this deliberate little box that we've been put and stuck in!

Just read the ancient writings. They know MORE than NASA will ever admit even though the PTB want to say their writings are just 'legends and myths'.
Ya know what's really a myth? This reality that they have us all believing in.

reply to post by Human_Alien


Illogical.

I feel in my deepest essence and almost like an understanding...that the Moon is most likely artificial.

And, totally unsupportable, based on vast amounts of science and observation. Including, these latest findings:

Moon has iron core, confirmed by Seismic Array Processing

And, the samples from Apollo, and even from the Soviet return samples.

And, basic cosmology sciences, and laws of orbital mechanics, and physics, and Kepler...etc....

If the moon is fake, then how did the tides work before the moon? It is my understanding that the tides helped evolution along. What was the tilt of the axis? It is to my understanding that the moon keeps the earth steady instead of wobbling on its axis like Mars. This is why we have the seasons we do.
There are so many real questions that need to be answered that this theory is non exsitant in my opinion.

reply to post by NorkiSpaceDuck


I had a question but answered it myself buy looking up your camera.
but I will add a helpful little bit that was part of the question

I don't think your camera can change lenses so what I was going to suggest you can
not do Unless you make it your self

a T-ring / T-adapter

It will help keep what your viewing in your eye piece in frame. and keep it stable.
They are simple to make. couple peaces of PVC Pipe and some glue I had made one once for my old
powershot a510 to a different scope I had and it worked well.

reply to post by liejunkie01


I dont think your thinking quite deeply enough, The general thoery is that the moon was artificily/placed there way before any of "All that" Possibly a deliberate planet put there to help along evolution of life on this planet, Look how far the human race have come just trying to reach for this somewhat un-interesting rock

Originally posted by liejunkie01
If the moon is fake, then how did the tides work before the moon? It is my understanding that the tides helped evolution along. What was the tilt of the axis? It is to my understanding that the moon keeps the earth steady instead of wobbling on its axis like Mars. This is why we have the seasons we do.
There are so many real questions that need to be answered that this theory is non exsitant in my opinion.

That's why and how my theory helps answer that. There is absolutely NO proof the Moon affects us.
None. Zip. Nada.
It's been theorized that's all. No one's put a blanket over it to see what would happened to Earth. The closest we get to that possible affect is a Solar eclipse and even that, doesn't stop the tides for a moment.

It is my belief "gravity" emanates from--- thus is a bi-product of----- Earths core.

reply to post by TedHodgson


That is an interesting theory but there are way more questions to answer.


To Human Alien....Are you totally throwing out gravity as an affect on us. The moon does have gravity. This gravity causes the tides. This in turn has a direct effect on us on earth....I am puzzled could you explain a little more.

I am on lunch hour right now and do not have alot of time.

reply to post by TedHodgson


Can you cite where it's a "general theory"? Because, really....not in the world of science. The Lunar samples are definitive proof of it being related to Earth. Different proportions of some elelments, but that was the consequence of the formation event, and the way the nascent material coalesced.

This will help visualize it .... (NOT "actual footage, of course!!)

reply to post by weedwhacker


Yeah, Im not dismissing scientific involvement i was merely stating that (What i said) Was the theory been portrayed here, which i find to be a Quite exciting theory but obviously cannot be either proved or Dis-proved by science at the moment, I just find it a really interesting thoery (as i do with many thoeries on ats) which would spice up the utter boring rut of life in general we seem to be in at the moment,

But all anyone has is thoeries and untill they are undoubtedly proved i will continue to be somewhat intregued by them whilst trying to ellaborate on the ideas they enhance

(sorry about my spelling, i cant for the life of me find my glasses)

Strunctures ON the MOON...........OK. I concur.
MOON an Artificial Structure (death star-esque)?
I find that very hard to believe; given the size et al.