rendlesham forest eye witness

Originally posted by susp3kt
I'm not going to sugarcoat it...I don't believe you. Plenty of others are going to call you out as well, unless you produce that video pretty soon.

I'll gladly apologize for my disbelief when/if you post that footage!

I don't believe the guy, and I won't apologize for my disbelief in the unlikely event that new footage comes to light. This sounds exactly like that Roswell "witness" who popped up a month or so ago. Where is he? Yeah, that's right. Gone.

Originally posted by OptimisticPessimist
reply to post by eastsuffolk

 

Please feel free to describe the things you saw at Rendlesham while we wait - you know you want to!

the entity was huge, probably 8-9 feet tall, it seemed to be five feet from the craft one moment, and the next moment it was next to the craft.
it seemed to be scanning in, taking in the area, it seemed in no way bothered or interested in us.

ATS, Please refrain from flagging this until we get a least a little proof...

Anyhow, I've got some questions for you.

Originally posted by eastsuffolk
I will get right to the point. I was present at the rendlesham forest incident

In what capacity?

There was film footage taken of the craft and entities

By who? You? Since you where there? Or or the Late Mrs. Bruni's brother? If him, why was he there?

..prooves my point to...

Being nit picky I know. But it's "proves" and "too"

i think the fact that many credible military personnel have spoken out about it

...a video tape with 15 minutes of extremely clear footage, showing a tall grey like creature standing silently by the craft.

I agree. I think that credibility is added because of the original eyewitness reports. However, I don't believe they ever said anything about a "tall grey like creature".

reply to post by eastsuffolk

with regards to the craft i wasnt there when it landed, i was only drawn to the area by the comotion
it was the size of a large helicopter, obviously not helicopter in shape or features, it was silent and on the ground
everybody was scared, panicking if you will, i can not answer with regards to animals seeing as i didnt see any present

The size of a helicopter? Are you sure about that??

Here are diagrams of the plaster casts taken a day later:

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/13660e40ac2e.gif[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/81fee2156eb5.gif[/atsimg]

Also here is the small area where they found It:





Obviously too small for something the size of a helicopter.

Also, animals were said to have being going crazy when this thing was around as well, are you sure you didn't see any on your way to the craft? After all you say you saw the commotion and went to the size. That seems unusual to me tbh.

Also, again I ask, what night was this? It seems as though you have purposefully avoided this among my other questions.

reply to post by Rising Against


Your post says

It was dead silent. No animals were even making noise anymore.

but you also say animals were going crazy around it. Which is it? And, not to defend the OP quite yet, but I have been near helicopters that were about the size of a common car, so your picture looks appropriately sized for that.

And, he said he was there delivering munitions on the night of December 26.

reply to post by getreadyalready

but you also say animals were going crazy around it. Which is it? And, not to defend the OP quite yet, but I have been near helicopters that were about the size of a common car, so your picture looks appropriately sized for that.

Made a mistake.

When they got to the craft, apparently the noise had died down.

I wrote my post up fairly quickly and made mistakes.

I'm looking for more info to edit still.

EDIT: Here is what they said upon coming nearer to the craft:

"we started on foot towards those lights. At the same time we could hear the animals were getting very upset. At that point we got a radio transmission, they had just got in contact with Heathrow [Airport]. An object had been seen over our base and had disappeared on radar." Jim Penniston confirms the radar related message which they received from CSC, "they [CSC - John Coffey] notified me that they were tracking an unidentified bogey about 15 minutes ago and they confirmed it with contact with eastern radar and Heathrow in London and the approximate location was about 5 miles off base when they lost contact with it."

And here is what they said upon getting much closer to it:

"no landing gear was apparent, but it seemed like it was on fixed legs. I walked around the craft, and finally, I walked right up to the craft. I noticed the fabric of the shell was like a smooth, opaque, black glass. The bluish lights went from black to grey to blue. I was pretty much confused at that point. I kept trying to put this in some kind of frame of reference, trying to find some logical explanation as to what this was and what was going on. It was dead silent. No animals were even making noise anymore. The nearer we got to that thing the more uneasy I felt...it was as if I was moving in slow motion."

Sorry for the confusion.

Also, see the second Image I added. It shows the exact distance of where the allegedly object. They placed markers you can't see on the enlarged image. It's actually a very small area, certainly not the size suitable for anything near a helicopter.

Originally posted by eastsuffolk

Originally posted by OptimisticPessimist
reply to post by eastsuffolk

 

Please feel free to describe the things you saw at Rendlesham while we wait - you know you want to!

the entity was huge, probably 8-9 feet tall, it seemed to be five feet from the craft one moment, and the next moment it was next to the craft.
it seemed to be scanning in, taking in the area, it seemed in no way bothered or interested in us.

Thank You.
That's everything I needed.

I'm calling Troll, although an astute individual from Yorkshire got there before me.

I can sit back & just watch the fun now. Cool!

reply to post by OptimisticPessimist


The correct name for this Paticular Troll Is infact a Schnitzel

reply to post by Rising Against


Thanks, it is still likely a hoax , but I didn't want to see you get bogged down in some minute details or miscommunications.

Originally posted by getreadyalready
reply to post by Rising Against

 

Thanks, it is still likely a hoax

, but I didn't want to see you get bogged down in some minute details or miscommunications.

lol, I wanted to get my information out as quickly as possible you see. Therefore mistakes were bound to occur.

instead of attacking me from all angles, my friend bertha is here and we are getting a transfer of the vhs footage done right now!

ps where do i upload it?

reply to post by eastsuffolk
Better darn well not be a.....

rick-roll.

Originally posted by eastsuffolk
instead of attacking me from all angles, my friend bertha is here and we are getting a transfer of the vhs footage done right now!

Most of us are simply searching for the truth. And considering you haven't given any so far can you blame us for being skeptical?

Originally posted by TedHodgson
reply to post by OptimisticPessimist

 

The correct name for this Paticular Troll Is infact a Schnitzel

why dont you shut up


moderator if i get one more nasty word from anyone accusing me of being somebody else, i will cancel the vhs transfer

ps itll take about 20 minutes to convert and then another 10 to upload, please advise where

let them babble .. word is when you post your video there all gonna shut up !

im confident you got interesting footage for us ,

reply to post by Rising Against


I just Got Foe,d, Un-Foe.d Then Foe'd again

Somebody really hates me....

Right ill be quiet and see where this goes..

reply to post by fazeone1981

when you post your video

It will be extensively analyzed.

reply to post by TedHodgson


A pattern is starting to emerge, wouldn't you say?

reply to post by TedHodgson


In case anyone was wondering, he's not referring to me here.

Anyway OP, can you answer the rest of my questions at least? And what do you have to say in regards to the size of the object after I shown It to be nothing like the size of a helicopter using images from the size? Just curious as what you say doesn't seem to make sense in all honesty. For me anyway.

reply to post by laterallateral


I would say