It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AllIsOne
There are plenty of passages in the NT where Jesus claims that he is the only way. How do you justify this with your claim that Jesus was non-religious? It's sounds rather "exclusive" than "inclusive" to me ...
1Let not your heart be troubled: ye believe in God, believe also in me. 2In my Father's house are many mansions: if it were not so, I would have told you.
I go to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto myself; that where I am, there ye may be also.
4And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. 5Thomas saith unto him, Lord, we know not whither thou goest; and how can we know the way? 6Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
7If ye had known me, ye should have known my Father also: and from henceforth ye know him, and have seen him.
8Philip saith unto him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. 9Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?
10Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father that dwelleth in me, he doeth the works.
11Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for the very works' sake.
12Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.
13And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14If ye shall ask any thing in my name, I will do it. 15If ye love me, keep my commandments.
1Behold, what manner of love the Father hath bestowed upon us, that we should be called the sons of God: therefore the world knoweth us not, because it knew him not. 2Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. 3And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.
20And when he was demanded of the Pharisees, when the kingdom of God should come, he answered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation: 21Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you.
Originally posted by AllIsOne
Slippery slope my friend. The God that Jesus referred to as his "father" and described in the OT, is not a god I can accept. I know that Jesus "reset" everything, but still ... It's his father that troubles me, and Jesus never disputed where he came from.
It seems to me that you are cherry-picking, albeit in a "modern" Christian way. But it is still cherry-picking! I grew up roman-catholic in Europe and I was very surprised when I found out that many American "born-again Christians" do not believe in the OT, but fully embrace the NT. I think this is a logical fallacy because Jesus never denied his "father".
Anyway, I don't believe in the Trinity either. But to each his own.
Originally posted by AllIsOne
reply to post by IAMIAM
Slippery slope my friend. The God that Jesus referred to as his "father" and described in the OT, is not a god I can accept. I know that Jesus "reset" everything, but still ... It's his father that troubles me, and Jesus never disputed where he came from.
It seems to me that you are cherry-picking, albeit in a "modern" Christian way. But it is still cherry-picking! I grew up roman-catholic in Europe and I was very surprised when I found out that many American "born-again Christians" do not believe in the OT, but fully embrace the NT. I think this is a logical fallacy because Jesus never denied his "father".
Anyway, I don't believe in the Trinity either. But to each his own.
The Father - Your Consciousness, who you are underneath all the mess you have learned here.
The Son - Your Ego, who you are to the world
The Holy Ghost - The spirit that animates your body.
You do not have these three things?
Originally posted by AllIsOne
That is a nice interpretation with lots of omissions (the OT-god was an oppressive, murderous thug who favored one people). We can bend anything to fit our story. I see a lot of New Age thinking in your post, interwoven with Christ consciousness. It's a nice hybridization, but definitely your own concocted brew.
You can bend it all you want, but the omniscient, non-loving God of the OT and Jesus don't mix. Apologists have to suspend logic to explain it and that is what you do. You declare one part of the same story (bible) obsolete, or false (OT) while you fully accept the other (NT) ... ???
Originally posted by Rustami
reply to post by dizzylizzy
sounds like you may have read a thing or two or I'm misreading something, Lord knows it would'nt be the first time but maybe the second, no seriously I'm generally that perfect
This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my laws in their hearts, and I will write them on their minds.
Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances, (Touch not; taste not; handle not; Which all are to perish with the using after the commandments and doctrines of men? Which things have indeed a shew of wisdom in will worship, and humility, and neglecting of the body: not in any honour to the satisfying of the flesh.
For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves: Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another
For all the law is fulfilled in one word, even in this: “You shall love your neighbor as yourself.”
may find these interesting
He answered and said, “I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”
My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.
And other sheep I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.
Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the LORD shall name.
edit on 20-2-2011 by Rustami because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrEuphoric1
In order for humanity to ascend to the next level, Religious fanatics still holding on to OLD beliefs that they don't even understand will either have to open there minds or pass on. It's all EVOLUTION. The strong will survive. Not the people who think some magical god is going to protect them. ALLAH IS REAL, BUT ITS NOT WHO THEY THINK! That is my opinion, and I am entitled to it.
Originally posted by AllIsOne
My dear friend, you obviously are unable to see the circular reasoning you employ to defend a text. You have yet to address my points rather than just say "Jesus said so ...". That is a cop out.
Originally posted by Pilot
Why do you suppose it is necessary to be "commanded" to love?? When asked for the first commandment of all by the Pharisees Jesus spaketh thus:
"Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, with all thy soul, with all thy mind and with all thy strength, this is the first and greatest commandment, and the second is thou shall love thy neighbor as thyself."
Originally posted by Pilot
Love happens without divine edict. Reflect upon the world of the Americas found by the conquistadores. "damned wantlessness" and such. Were natives instructed to love their mothers and brothers and sisters? Animals? Nature? I bet not. It welled up in them, as in us, it supports our very being, we're soaking in it.
Originally posted by Pilot
What patriarchy has done by way of the Abrahamic delusions is rip the capacity to love spontaneously out of us and sold it back for a price: aquiescence to itself. This is exactly how all manner of evil can be perpetrated by humans, we have been deceived. Shattered empathy with each other and the planet.
Originally posted by Pilot
I won't have a part of it. Moderate Christians; decent, kind people are in collusion with their co-believers whether they like it or not. Sorry.
I have had a liftime of very bizzare experiences which a religionist might define as "spiritual" experiences, however I have simply learned not to trust such experiences as being "real," any more than my dreams are real, since such experiences vary from person to person, from region to region and from religion to religion.
Such experience have however been very interesting and they help me to understand the mind of a person who suffering from religious psychosis and delusions
Since I have never been a Christian my experiences tended to confirm my essential "Crowleyanty" whereas a Christian might find their "Jesus faith" to be confirmed by such experiences and similarly with a devotee of Ganesha, Hanunam or any of the numerous deities and cults. Such experiences my seem to confirm one's own particular name brand of cultism, but in fact they are a very unreliable means of doing that, even if it seems otherwise, just as the hallucinations of schizophrenics seem very real to them.
Hallucinations are as real as any other experience to the person with schizophrenia. As many as 70% hear voices, while a lesser number have visual hallucinations. –Auditory hallucinations can be either inside the person’s head or externally. When external, they sound as real as an actual voice. Sometimes they come from no apparent source, other times they come from real people who don’t actually say anything, other times a person will hallucinate sounds. –When people hear voices inside their heads, it is as if their inner thoughts are no longer alone. The new voices can talk to each other, talk to themselves, or comment on the person’s actions. The majority of the time the voices are negative.
No. I am not advocating that we round up all the religious people and institutionalize them. That would be plain stupid. However, what I am attempting to show is that religious thought operates like a mental illness. Religious thought must be challenged no matter how much they will kick and scream about their feelings being hurt because of it. ”The time of respecting beliefs of this sort is long past”-Sam Harris