It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An estimated 30 percent of all puppies sold in America come from Missouri — a whopping 750,000 dogs each year — earning the Show Me State a new unwanted, unofficial title: The "Puppy Mill State." In November, Missouri voters narrowly passed the "Puppy Mill Cruelty Prevention Act," heralded as a "huge paw print forward." This move to improve both the state's reputation and the "deplorable" conditions of some of its breeding facilities would bar breeders from housing more than 50 dogs and require that those animals receive sufficient food, water, space, vet care, and time off between breeding cycles. But now some state lawmakers want to overturn the new law, saying it would restrict a growth industry and do more harm than good. Really?
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
As an animal owner I think they should all be shut down personally!
Should Missouri ban puppy mills?
What Is a Puppy Mill? A puppy mill is a large-scale commercial dog breeding operation where profit is given priority over the well-being of the dogs. Unlike responsible breeders, who place the utmost importance on producing the healthiest puppies possible, breeding at puppy mills is performed without consideration of genetic quality. This results in generations of dogs with unchecked hereditary defects.
Originally posted by Trublbrwing
reply to post by sugarcookie1
I honestly don't get it.
Aren't there children and entire families who are homeless and hungry? Before anyone invests one minute or one dollar on animals they should consider diverting those resources to humans.
As for the puppy mills, they are quite nice compared to the accomodations your chicken sandwich or hamburger endured.
Originally posted by FoJAk
reply to post by sugarcookie1
Seems like a poopy business to me (not to make a pun). Do they disguise themselves as animal shelters? Otherwise, who would put up with them having, or even selling mal-treated animals? Simply disgusting. Being as we treat humans the same in sweatshops/etc., I guess I can't be too much surprised.
The proposed law, sponsored by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), would toughen current legislation that already requires large-scale dog breeders to provide animals with sufficient food, clean water, housing and space; necessary veterinary care; regular exercise and adequate rest between breeding cycles.
What local opponents dislike about the initiative petition is language that would prohibit any breeder from having more than 50 dogs for the purpose of selling their puppies as pets.
Good breeder will always provide proof of claims they make, this might be in the form of a pedigree, test results, contracts, etc. Breeders will provide you with proof of genetic testing on the puppy, the parents or most likely both. Some of the common tests breeder do are the OFA (for hips), CERF (for eyes), PennHIP (for hips), and BAER (for hearing) just to name a few. These will also be up to date, the CERF testing, for example, has to be done every year. Probably the most distinguishable aspect of a good breeder is that they stay in contact with those that they have sold their puppies to. They are more than willing to provide grooming, training, and medical advice if needed. They will also take the dog back no matter how old, if the owner can no longer take care of him.
Originally posted by sugarcookie1
I totally agree Buy From Reputable Breeders, NOT Pet Shops or BackYard Breeders..
Originally posted by RRokkyyIt takes
a socialist govt to sort it out with regulations