Mary Rodwell: The New Humans (video)

Love love LOVE this lady!
You want truth? Here it is (can't embed)

vodpod.com...

Sounds crazy? That means you're getting closer to the truth.

She says at the start "where is the evidence?" and then spends the entire video giving none, slide show drawings, crayon pictures and people claiming they have been abducted isn't really evidence at all... and I did watch it all the way through before you ask...

reply to post by Human_Alien


When someone makes a claim that sounds totally crazy - that is totally incongruent with our day to day experience of the world - why should we believe them?

What's the difference between what she is saying and me saying that yesterday I jumped over the moon? Isn't the difference only that what she is saying is appealing? There's certainly no evidence for it; there's no way to verify it; there's no biological basis for the starchild claim; what's the difference between these claims and any other crazy things anyone could come up with?

It's not that I'm hardset in a worldview that strictly rejects these ideas. I am open minded, but that doesn't mean I'll believe anything anyone says. Why should anyone believe the stuff in this video? How is it different than if someone said they jumped over the moon? Isn't it totally inconsistent with the reality that we experience day to day? If we accept claims like these, why shouldn't we accept the claims of every quack who tells us something mystical that sounds good to us?

If the starchild are real, how can there not be a biological basis? They have the same DNA and organs and cells as the rest of us. We know that the mind is based on the brain; if these people have magic mental powers, why do they have normal brains? If any of these powers are real, why don't they ever stand up to serious scientific examination? (With rare exceptions that are ambiguous at best)

I'm not here to be a hardline debunker, but I am skeptic. Why should we believe these extraordinary claims? The "scientific" claims she references aren't published in any peer reviewed journals; they're just independant books and articles which means they are not held to any sort of scientific standard.

reply to post by roughycannon


Since you've watched the whole thing (only first 5 minutes, so far...will see the whole when have time, just for entertainment)....my initial impression is, How different, or how much like David Icke is she??

Can you tell?

She is certainly a better presenter, more polished to listen to, for sure. Puts me to the mind of a distinguished British actress of note, so for that alone, it's tolerable.


Adding....I really, really wish all of what she says could have a germ of truth. ON the other hand, as I am still thinking up some good screenplay ideas, well....a lot of these concepts have, unfortunately, been covered many times before.

Originally posted by Human_Alien

Sounds crazy? That means you're getting closer to the truth.

My therapist keeps teling me that... I think she's just trying to drive me crazy...

reply to post by weedwhacker


I do think she believes what she is saying and I don't have a problem with that but I honestly think she is a little disillusioned, her smart talk and sensible ways in some peoples minds give her some credibility but I personally don't think that what she thinks is real is in fact real.

The evidence in the video is speculation at the most there is a part when she is talking about children with special ability's and it is just a slideshow of scenery with text underneath making claims about the "special" powers these children have and she simply reads out the text under the pictures, you would think during a presentation like this that she would at least have video evidence of these amazing claims...

Here is an example of the slideshow:



That image stays on screen while she reads the text underneath and this is her evidence? she doesn't even have a picture of the children and it comes across like a bunch of hear'say... something she heard from some other guy who's mate told him if you know what I mean.

reply to post by OnceReturned


Then don't agree.

I don't care.

Wish you would.
But.......we'll both get thorough life fine without agreeing!
To those who resonate with this?.....Glad you watched it.

reply to post by roughycannon


The evidence is within what she's showing.

Understand please: either you get it or you don't.
We're all on different levels. That's fine. I understand that.

I happen to get it. And this is obviously not meant for you. Which is fine.

Hope you find what you're looking for (because we're all looking for purpose and origin) because for me and millions of others? It's right here.
Can't explain and don't purport to understand it. I just get it.

Best

reply to post by weedwhacker


Wow WW, for a moment, I actually liked you!

Maybe you're not that bad after all!

reply to post by roughycannon


Delusional?

Can you give me a 20 word summary of sane? (seeing that's the closest word I can come up with which would mean the opposite)

For me? I much rather have a conversation with a homeless man, on the street, talking to himself, than a middle-aged middle class fat cat on the line at Walmart.

Why? Because I think there's a very fine line between awareness and insanity.

The "truth" is .............NOTHING like we were taught folks.

I am here to make that perfectly clear.
So sometimes, when this 'truth' is presented, often times, people can't process it or make sense of it.

So for me, the 'mentally ill' or like Mary said, the autistic and people suffering from ADHD, are probably so finely tuned in and accelerated.... that they simply don't fit into this systematic and programmed world of ours any longer.

Why? Because they are the next generation of upgraded Humans

So, sane and delusional?
It's all a matter of understanding.

lots there of interest to me. though I did not watch in entirety, did she ever show the first women's drawings? I didn't like how she said she was not gonna show them then mentions a dvd.

I’m only half way through the video, but I had to stop to look this up Hundredth monkey syndrome / effect .

I never knew about this phenomena. I am truly very intrigued, as this may well have something to do with the depopulation agenda.

reply to post by Whateva69


Yes, except it was discredited, shown to be a myth and not valid, right there in the "hundredth monkey phenomenon" article.

Not sure why the non-existent "depopulation" meme was brought up in relation? Can't see any relevance, even if there were a kernel of truth on that front.

Thank you for posting. This is so close to the truth l could almost feel my fingers burning. keep posting. Posts like this are the reason l keep coming to this site. There are none so blind as those who cannot see. Peace star.

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Love love LOVE this lady!
You want truth? Here it is (can't embed)

vodpod.com...

Sounds crazy? That means you're getting closer to the truth.

I am sure shes not out to make any money

www.amazon.com...

*whistles*

Originally posted by Human_Alien
Love love LOVE this lady!
You want truth? Here it is (can't embed)

vodpod.com...

Sounds crazy? That means you're getting closer to the truth.

I have also seen the drawings by the lady in the first UFO abduction on the video you have linked. The drawings are doodles, my cousins does exactly the same and has no UFO experiences. Also the part about not concentrating on drawings or distracting yourself is a good way to draw. I have played around with art and sketching and I find I drew best when I wasn't thinking about it at all, as the concious brain can interfere in what your trying to do, so no amazing revelation there.

She uses Project Camelot as a source of info, omg can it get any lower. Project Camelot who do not ask any critical questions, and seem to accept everything as truth.

1 hour 12 mins 26 secs into the video, wow. Now thats another reason why the UFO subject gets a bad rap. If I was the guy on the table, I would either laugh or freak out lol.

reply to post by CrazyMonkey


Yes!! Utter bollocks.

As she was describing it, before that point, I had one thought: Those religious nutjobs who claim to "speak in tongues".

Sure enough, as the sound track switched to the scene of her "session" with that (how did he keep a straight face?) subject on the table....PAY DIRT!!!

The nonsense syllables, exactly the same as those crazies in a so-called "religious frenzy" in the tent revivals in East Chicken Coop, Arkansas (or wherever....).

reply to post by weedwhacker



Sounds about right! I wonder how much money that healer makes, maybe I am in the wrong job! lol