It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jennybee35
reply to post by Claytonius
The problem with this line of reasoning is this: did we really expect these known hoaxers and charlatans, (like Cohen and Faal) to leave this alone? Really? You know they could hardly WAIT to put their stamp on it, even if they had to wait a day or two after the original release to ruin the video with poorly added audio.
We are talking about men who will do anything to have their name out there connected to any incident, even if they have to hi-jack a complete strangers video evidence. Isn't that what has happened here?
They seem to me to be terribly desperate to attach themselves to ANY incident when media attention may be garnered, especially if it is something seemingly real. I mean, their purpose is to make money, right. If they can manage to get in on the ground floor of a sighting like this and attach themselves to it from the start, then their names are forever associated with it, real or hoax.
That's their M.O, ain't it?edit on 2/3/11 by jennybee35 because: dang spelling![/quo
Of course I have considered this...But you must find it a little strange that NO Israeli news source has picked up the story, except for one that calls crackpots space experts. It is also suspect that Michael Cohen is the only person that has actually talked to one of the up-loaders. I can't decide, let alone prove whether or not these videos are hoaxes. I can however, provide any info I find and I consider this quite a juicy tidbit. Until I posted the Israeli news link, most on this forum thought Israel wan't even covering the story.edit on 3-2-2011 by Claytonius because: spellin
Originally posted by Paradigm2012
Originally posted by DeboWilliams
lol ok sorry for that.
Paradigm2012, what would qualify as solid evidence for you, since you are able to easily dismiss all of the current information given on this subject.
What would you require to say "Ok this is a hoax and I've been bamboozled"? please enlighten usedit on 3-2-2011 by DeboWilliams because: (no reason given)
I would require some evidence that its a hoax. Actually solid evidence of a hoax.
Audio from 1 source taken on 2 cellphones is not evidence.
anything more concrete?
Originally posted by jennybee35
reply to post by Claytonius
Thanks for realizing I'm a ma'am!
I don't know how I feel about these videos, but I DO think it's a shame that because those opportunistic leeches have attached themselves to this incident and are more than willing to be in the public eye that so many here dismiss it out of hand.
I also appreciate every piece of evidence and research that has been done tus far, both for and against. It's the only way to be able to come to any decision.
The charlatans don't care if it's true or not. They will accept whatever attention this brings to them, good or bad. These men are what the term "media whore" was coined for!edit on 2/3/11 by jennybee35 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by willie9696
Ever get the feeling that the TPTB are testing the waters to see what people will accept?