It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by apodictic
reply to post by smthngmssnghr
They show how biased wikileaks is to the Israeli agenda. THAT is my basis for discrediting wikileaks.
I'd vote my dog over wikileaks anyday.
I can at least see my dog's actions
and know for certain who's feeding
him and see where he takes a [snip].
Originally posted by cluckerspud
reply to post by SlovenlyGhost
Well deserved indeed. Thanks for sharing.
Originally posted by backinblack
We don't know for sure you even have a dog..
Let alone what or who feeds it...
We don't know for sure you even have a dog.. Let alone what or who feeds it...
Originally posted by jamiejames
And, what EXACTLY are they doing to promote peace???
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Originally posted by backinblack
We don't know for sure you even have a dog..
Let alone what or who feeds it...
ah yes, the wikileaks fan club is in full swing here.
I forgot to enter this thread with my hip boots on
as the [snip] around here is getting deep.
No thanks, [snip] hunting is not on my
"to-do" list today. You wikileaks fan boys
have fun in ur mental dysfunction thread.
I'm out
Originally posted by BetweenLines
After Kissinger and Obama, it just isn't the same....
2nd
Originally posted by disfugured
reply to post by backinblack
We don't know for sure you even have a dog.. Let alone what or who feeds it...
That was precisely his point!
Second lineedit on 3-2-2011 by disfugured because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SlovenlyGhost
Snorre Valen, a member of the Norwegian coalition government's Socialist Left Party, has nominated the website, saying it is a gauge of transparency in the world.
Link-www.abc.net.au...
I'd really like to hear what the Wikileak haters have to say about this. Personally I think it's well deserved and this would really put a thorn in the side of all those who do not agree with Wikileaks and their agenda of transparency.
edit on 11/09/2010 by SlovenlyGhost because: (no reason given)edit on 11/09/2010 by SlovenlyGhost because: (no reason given)edit on 3-2-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: (no reason given)