A totally new version of the Jerusalem UFO!

NOTICE: This older topic has been supplanted by a much-larger more active discussion thread with excellent detailed analysis on each of the four "Jerusalem UFO" videos released. For more details, visit the topic below:

HOAX UFO over Jerusalem










This is in addition to the previous videos seen here...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Well that is different angle/perspective, thanks! If that is not cgi, then this one could be a good un'!
Hopefully some of our cgi savvy residents can chime in on this one.

peace,
spec

reply to post by Analyzing


WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Is that a 3rd perspective of the same UFO?

reply to post by Analyzing

Already posted and debunked to death:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Looks like a still image (especially when it's zoomed in). No flash like the original 2...

Topic will probably be closed.

Looks like a still photo...Moving around..

Look at the street lights...
The flare around the lights..
It is frozen pixels..



Ram is back? No just passing by..
-
Cheers.

Interesting; the way it pulses, it looks like it was alive or like a holograph. It seemed to be focused on the point of the tower. How quickly it shoots up as well.I don't have any other ideas unless it was terrestrial. Good addition.

reply to post by Analyzing


What happened to the "flash" that was in the 1st 2 video's just before it takes off?

reply to post by Ram

Look at the street lights...
The flare around the lights..
It is frozen pixels..

Hahaha, REALLY? With 2 other pieces of footage that confirm it was actually there, you try to play it off as CGI or something? Heh...

Where is the flash?

And why don't they pan up to see the rest of the display?

Oh, and it looks fake

Originally posted by SchoolProject
reply to post by Analyzing

 

Already posted and debunked to death:

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Looks like a still image (especially when it's zoomed in). No flash like the original 2...

Topic will probably be closed.

Haha, that is closed too, because there's another "main" thread for all these videos...however, I personally feel this video deserves it own thread, this is whacked out footage.

reply to post by Analyzing


CGI!

Really I don't know, just had to scream CGI since it seems to be the excuse so many times, though many of the clips presented are CGI, I am not sure with this one.

The crowd participation is on, the UFO enters and leaves - unlike so many clips, where people want to know why the filming 'just stops' before the UFO leaves.

Maybe the reactions are post-production and edited in.

I know there are many great members here, so getting to the bottom of this should be swift. I am no ORB expert and, personally, I don't like them, just because they are hard to judge in size/distance/speed, they have no real detail to evaluate what is behind their lighted appearance.

I hope the ATS members will come along shortly with some more information about 'ORB' ufos and more opinions on what this could be, if authentic.

Nice thread, thanks for it!

I'm calling fake, it looks like the UFO videos that people do with a still background pic.

Take a high res picture and animate a UFO on it.

Then using software such as adobe after effect zoom into the newly created animation and move the view around to simulate camera movement there tons of them on youtube.

If you look at the video everything is complete static, the twinkle from the street lights and when moving around perspective would change from the foreground and the background objects but they don't I'm convinced this is fake.

reply to post by esteay812

Maybe the reactions are post-production and edited in.

That's what I'm starting to think, and why did the vid just quit after the thing shot up? It does kind of look like someone took a pic of the setting then superimposed the ufo part.
Dang, I have got to start watching these vids 3 to 4 times before making a decision!

spec

reply to post by roughycannon

I'm calling fake, it looks like the UFO videos that people do with a still background pic.

Ok, seriously, is it just me, or is that explanation total and absolute crap?

It looks like a freaking pulsing ball of light and nothing more....

It doesn't look fake, it doesn't look cheaply done....

We have 2 other pieces of footage confirming it was in that location then shot off...

But oh no...this is clearly CGI...I give up...

reply to post by Planet teleX

Where is the flash?

Well, considering they are on a low level inside the city and have an abundance of light pollution surrounding them, their camera probably wouldn't register a flash of light spread out above the city.

Even to the untrained eye you can notice the squares on the video as if the user has simply zoomed in to a computer monitor. This isn't ground breaking stuff.

reminds me of other UFO videos where the dialogue is phony and contrived. "Oh we see those all the time". Come on folks! A group of midwestern tourists see a UFO like that and make those kind of statements? This is scripted by someone who tried to script "natural" dialogue and goes way overboard, making it sound artificial.

Looks real to me. Same ball of light BUT this time you can see it pulsing or possibly spinning, the camera moves, people are all commenting on it and reacting to it's movement.

If your down right saying this is fake.... I don't even know what to tell ya.

Awesome footage! Please tell me we're going to be seeing a lot more of these kind of sightings, very excite!

reply to post by SchoolProject


when they zoom on object, scanlines are visable.

reply to post by Jazz87


I think I and others, have the right to shout HOAX on this as much as anyone has the right to say this is proof of ET.

Please EVERYONE who believes this video to be real watch the links on this post. PLEASE?! - www.abovetopsecret.com...

You can clearly see the pixelation from an LCD monitor in the video. There's no point arguing it!

Also, not a SINGLE person has mentioned the lack of the flash???

reply to post by Analyzing

A totally new version of the Jerusalem UFO!

It's been my feeling that the first two videos were going to be attacked by injecting a third or fourth version that would be totally bogus. The hoaxed versions would then be publicly exposed, thus discrediting the first two.

So... if I had to guess, I'd say that this one is the virus... and once it is exposed to be a fake, the first two... which may be genuine, would be judged hoaxes as well.

There is no flash here that I can detect... at least that would equal what was seen in the first two versions. The orb/object has no depth, no intrinsic feel of being actually there.

I'm calling this one a plant to discredit the originals.