posted on Jan, 30 2011 @ 10:28 PM
My theory, albeit flawed, and not fully concieved, I believe is a large plausibility, backed up by the Bush administrations blatant use the 'cause'
of events to sponsor the 'effect' of gaining public support for things that seemed outraegous otherwise. My idea, brevity applied, is that 9/11 was
the proverbial spring board to the war 'on terror', which was desirable by the NWO in part that such a war against groups like Al-Qaeda and the
Taliban because they pose a threat. In essence, were the # to hit the fan and countries begin enacting full martial law, these groups would stand at
the forefront of resistance, a grop of dedicated, well funded, well armed warriors who refuse to accept rule from an outside source besides their
deity. So, in a nutshell, the 'war on terror' is more like 'pre-emptive strike on our enemies'