It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Anticipating a ban, the builders stopped using the materials by the time they reached the 40th floor of the north tower, the first one to go up.
Originally posted by roboe
reply to post by Cassius666
It's an exaggeration.
Anticipating a ban, the builders stopped using the materials by the time they reached the 40th floor of the north tower, the first one to go up.
www.nytimes.com...
Nice thread you linked to though, I almost felt I was on Stormfront for a second
Originally posted by Cassius666
According to thise site, from a financial viewpoint the lease on the twin towers would have made no sense from a financial point of view, because the fact they were filled with asbestos and which would have to be removed by a private owner did not make leasing the wtc an attractive buisness.
Is there any truth to it? Or are is that an exageration?edit on 30-1-2011 by Cassius666 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by QueSeraSera
There was supposedly also the great expense that would have been required to retrofit both "white elephant" towers with current state-of-the-art internet connections. I read that somewhere but can't provide a link to the source right now, as it was several years ago I heard of it. Maybe someone else remembers this too?