It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Dallas Morning News reported that the fine for disorderly conduct/abusive language was $340, but other charges included failure to show for a hearing.
...
Mullins (the "kid") acknowledges she was wrong.
School police officers in Texas are doling out more tickets to children as young as 6, who under past disciplinary practices would have been sent to the principal's office instead, according to a report by a Texas nonprofit.
Originally posted by Montana
So, after reading the news article, my top-notch investigative abilities were able to determine that the school had nothing to do with the fine. The school punished her with 'lunch detention'. Whatever that is.
The three hundred and forty dollar original fine was the result of a civil charge brought in court by the teacher for "disorderly conduct/abusive language" because she was "offended" by the girl's use of foul language. The fine was served to the girl by the school resource officer, which for those who may not know is a police officer whose 'beat' is a public school.
In my opinion, the girl needs to spend some quality time with some public service and the teacher needs to 'cowgirl up' and quit acting like a prima donna.
Just my opinion.
Originally posted by jdub297
reply to post by warequalsmurder
Of course, you could post the facts, but that wouldn't serve an agenda, would it?
The "kid" was cited for disorderly conduct by a law enforcement officer assigned to her high school.
The Dallas Morning News reported that the fine for disorderly conduct/abusive language was $340, but other charges included failure to show for a hearing.
...
Mullins (the "kid") acknowledges she was wrong.
www.chron.com...
Why shouldn't teenage students be held to the same standards that apply to others? Should they be allowed to use abusive language in class, just because they are still students? What if the offense was for something else, like possession of a weapon, or drunk and disorderly?
Does the mere fact that some idiot who can't act civilly is still in school serve as an excuse?
Deny ignorance?
jw
Originally posted by Montana
reply to post by warequalsmurder
Every citizen has the right to petition for redress through the courts, which is what the teacher did. She went OUTSIDE of the school and filed a civil court case. The school had nothing to do with it.
Again, i think it was really weak, but she has the right, just like you or I.
Court records show that teacher Michelle Lene heard Victoria Mullins say "you trying to start (expletive)" loudly in class one day last October. She was sent to the principal's office and given lunch detention. The next day, the school resource officer presented the North Mesquite High School student a ticket.