It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Here the actual facts.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Facts we know;
There are over 12 witnesses
The video has been scrutinized many times
There were military personell also watching from the shore
Nobody has yet to debunk the footage.
Well over 12 people perhaps even 30 or forty people debunked this video.
It has been scrutinized many times even by military personell who say this is a hoax.
the video doesn't want to go away.
there are many cases that are far better.
most skeptics and believers don't really seem to care.
Here the actual facts.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Facts we know;
There are over 12 witnesses
The video has been scrutinized many times
There were military personell also watching from the shore
Nobody has yet to debunk the footage.
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Here the actual facts.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Facts we know;
There are over 12 witnesses
The video has been scrutinized many times
There were military personell also watching from the shore
Nobody has yet to debunk the footage.
Well over 12 people perhaps even 30 or forty people debunked this video.
It has been scrutinized many times even by military personell who say this is a hoax.
the video doesn't want to go away.
there are many cases that are far better.
most skeptics and believers don't really seem to care.
There are many more threads that 'but' my claims also. Why do I have to show proof and links when you and cancerman don't have to? I watched the video and its ridiculous. There is no evidence I have seen that convinces me this is a flying thing of any kind. Do you have proof or links? If not, I will post anything I want.
Originally posted by zigoapex
Originally posted by ZetaRediculian
Here the actual facts.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Facts we know;
There are over 12 witnesses
The video has been scrutinized many times
There were military personell also watching from the shore
Nobody has yet to debunk the footage.
Well over 12 people perhaps even 30 or forty people debunked this video.
It has been scrutinized many times even by military personell who say this is a hoax.
the video doesn't want to go away.
there are many cases that are far better.
most skeptics and believers don't really seem to care.
Their are many videos on this site that rebut every one of your unconfirmed claims. next time, show a little proof,
instead of firing from the hip with blanks.
Nobody and I mean nobody buys the "boat" theory I mean we all laugh at that theory.
lol I am laughing right now at that theory
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
most skeptics and believers don't really seem to care.
Originally posted by IMSAM
it WAS an alien cruise liner visiting planet earth
seriously let this thing die.It was explained thoroughly i might add here
Besides this akdogan guy is in the same boat with Maussan
It was a good effort to get some attention for the tourist period
Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
To go from this,
to this
is rather funny.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Originally posted by freelance_zenarchist
To go from this,
to this
is rather funny.
Originally posted by CigaretteMan
Alot of information at this website
turkeyufocase.blogspot.com...
"The objects in the footage have the structure of a specific material that is definitely not made up by any kind of computer animation, balloon, prop, model, or special effects used for simulation in a studio."
The Science and Technology Research Board of Turkey
The webpage then goes on to claim that "the official report stated" the following:
"The objects sighted in the aforementioned footage that have a structure that is made of specific material are definitely not made up by any kind of computer animation nor are they any form of special effects used for simulation in a studio or for a video effect therefore in conclusion it was decided that the sightings were neither a mockup or hoax."
The reality is that the TUBITAK report did _not_ "state" this, and its conclusion is not at all "historic".
All it concludes is that the video is probably a straightforward video of some object reflecting light rather than computer- generated SFX (although it qualifies even this by noting that inconsistencies in the date/time stamps "raise a suspicion about the validity of the time in which the recordings were made", implying some digital manipulation). But it certainly does _not_ conclude, as claimed by Sirius, "that the sightings were neither a mockup nor a hoax".
This is what it concludes (Sirius's translation):
"In conclusion, even though a detailed analysis of the footage is conducted, it might still remain unidentified. Hence, other reference objects need to be recorded in the same frame with the disputable object and further shootings need to be done by ourselves with special equipment in the same location and conditions.
"Accordingly, the term 'UFO' (Unidentified Flying Object) which has been used for these sort of dubious objects can also be used for these objects. But this definition does not mean that these objects are from extraterrestrial (flying saucer etc.) origin."
In other words, the TUBITAK representative can't say anything except that the video appears to show a "disputable object" or a "dubious object" of some sort but contains no useful information that could help determine what it is.