It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edmc^2
How confident are you with the future? Bright one? Can science resolve man's growing problems? Can man successfully solve his own problem - the threat of economic collapse, natural disasters, terrorism, pollution, population explosion, famine, increasing of lawlessness, collapse of moral values, nuclear as well as biological threats? This is the reality that man is now facing - at an incredibly alarming rate - in-spite of advancements in science and technology.
If man is just a product of evolution - then may an imaginary God have mercy on us.
Originally posted by hippomchippo
Oh boy, another thread where Edmc dances around the argument and posts bible quotes.
I'm sure THIS time he'll actually listen to the other person and not ignore any valid points!
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Originally posted by edmc^2
How confident are you with the future? Bright one? Can science resolve man's growing problems? Can man successfully solve his own problem - the threat of economic collapse, natural disasters, terrorism, pollution, population explosion, famine, increasing of lawlessness, collapse of moral values, nuclear as well as biological threats? This is the reality that man is now facing - at an incredibly alarming rate - in-spite of advancements in science and technology.
If man is just a product of evolution - then may an imaginary God have mercy on us.
Whether or not we can is irrelevant. It doesn't affect God's existence or non-existence either way.
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Scriptures aren't evidence of anything other than showing what ancient people believed to be true. And a lot of it has already been debunked by modern science
Originally posted by MrXYZ
reply to post by edmc^2
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control.
What are you talking about??? What's beyond our control, and how would it be in our control if god existed?
Just to give you one or two: the increasing violence and lawlessnes
The "Pandoras Box" - secret of the atom - does man has the power to eliminate nuclear weapons? Why do we need them if the desire of each one us is to live in peace? Yet we continue to do research and manufacture more powerful weapons? Latest in the arsenal - the neutron bomb. Why produce this weapon if anyone who would used it will be destroyed?
Also, scriptures got a ton crucial stuff wrong, like claiming the earth is flat,
claiming humans came into existence in their current form,
or claiming it's less than 4.5bil years old. You'd think if they were correct, they would get basic stuff like that correct..
Originally posted by edmc^2
If God exist and ignores the plight of mankind - his children - then He is guilty. But if he fulfills his promisess then anyone who goes against it will fare badly.
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control. Unless you have total faith in man's ability to control nature, his nature and circumstances.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Originally posted by edmc^2
If God exist and ignores the plight of mankind - his children - then He is guilty. But if he fulfills his promisess then anyone who goes against it will fare badly.
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control. Unless you have total faith in man's ability to control nature, his nature and circumstances.
What is the point of this? What are you trying to say?
Whether or not we can is irrelevant. It doesn't affect God's existence or non-existence either way.
Originally posted by edmc^2
If God exist and ignores the plight of mankind - his children - then He is guilty. But if he fulfills his promisess then anyone who goes against it will fare badly.
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control. Unless you have total faith in man's ability to control nature, his nature and circumstances.
Of course since you beleive that man evolved from lower forms, this does not make sense to you. Adam and Eve - a perfect couple with the ability to produce their own kind.
According to data the earth is around 4.5 billion - agrees with the Bible:
"In [the] beginning God created the heavens and the earth." -- Gen 1:1 >> no specific time given, earth could be more than 4 billions years old. Universe (heavens) could be 13 trillion years or more.
The earth and universe were made simultaneously then according to your interpretation of the bible.
Most of your posts are bible quotes, which are worthless, wrapped around philosophical drivel such as:
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Originally posted by edmc^2
If God exist and ignores the plight of mankind - his children - then He is guilty. But if he fulfills his promisess then anyone who goes against it will fare badly.
On the other hand if God is just a figment of our imagination or just an invention (as rnaa puts it) then I say mankind is doomed. For the problems that we are now facing are beyond our control. Unless you have total faith in man's ability to control nature, his nature and circumstances.
What is the point of this? What are you trying to say?
A reply to your post below:
Whether or not we can is irrelevant. It doesn't affect God's existence or non-existence either way.
Showing the relivance.