It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The photographer Andre Wagner plays with the elements. A gloving fire in Abel Tasman National Park New Zealand transforms the rainforest into a mystical landscape
Originally posted by Gradius Maximus
Looks like one of these Camp Fires people have
Camp site with small fire inside some rocks, Camera filter tweaked to a bit as well?
Too bad its not a bit clearer...may have been something interesting.
edit on 25-1-2011 by Gradius Maximus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Gradius Maximus
reply to post by Skywatcher2011
Because its not lava - Its a fire - In a hole.
Camera's capture interesting images if you leave the shutter open.
Even though the light may not have been captured in a snapshot, If the shutter is kept open on the camera, it will show all gathering points of light.
Originally posted by havenvideo
Here's a better quality version of the pic in question.
www.andre-wagner.com...
Beautiful pic, but it's not natural. The artist either doctored the photo or lit a fire or placed a light in the hole.edit on 25-1-2011 by havenvideo because: (no reason given)
Late response, but it's not natural because the artist created it himself. Is that hard to understand?
Originally posted by purplemer
Originally posted by havenvideo
Here's a better quality version of the pic in question.
www.andre-wagner.com...
Beautiful pic, but it's not natural. The artist either doctored the photo or lit a fire or placed a light in the hole.edit on 25-1-2011 by havenvideo because: (no reason given)
why by lightin a fire does it make the pic unatural...
kx
Now I can make a comment about the picture. I really like the glowing effects regardless if any extra enhancement was done. But I have to say that if there truly was a little fire, either:
a) flames would be shooting up a little higher to get the light reflection of nearby objects
b) sparks or smoke would at least be somewhat visible
c) none of the above