It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Washington (CNN) -- President Obama's State of the Union address Tuesday night will be "all about America winning," one of his top advisers told CNN. Valerie Jarrett said the president will focus on "winning for the future and what we have to do to be competitive in this global marketplace."
Facing a divided Congress, a still-recovering economy, and critics who say he has failed to adequately focus on jobs in the past, the president will present what Jarrett described as a "framework" for moving forward.
Don't expect many specifics, however. Those will follow in three weeks when Obama releases his budget, Jarrett said. Then "you'll see a great degree of specificity of how we'll get the job done."
In the address, "the most important speech he gives every year," the president will focus on innovation, Jarrett said. "We're the country that's known for creativity and ingenuity and entrepreneurship. It will be about education, making sure that our children are going to be prepared for the jobs of tomorrow, that our innovators are going to be able to compete in this global marketplace. It will be about focusing on infrastructure and investing in our country so that we can get businesses to invest right here at home."
They are all reporting that Obama plans to SPEND, SPEND, SPEND-again
Since John F. Kennedy, no President has understood that budget deficits are only remedied through economic expansion and growth, and not by cutbacks in Federal spending, tax increases, austerity, or selling off government assets to the private sector. Most Presidents since the early 1960s have insisted that this country could not have a strong defense and at the same time make the necessary infrastructure investments for economic growth.
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Had I been POTUS instead of Cheney/Bush, this would have been my thinking:
INSTEAD of making a run at the throne of the earth ie: global geostrategic hegemony, by authorizing the muder of 3000 of my own constituents, in order to wage resource and domination wars as per the PNAC (with a soft c) recommendations, and sacrificing another million innocent souls in the process to a Satanic doctrine..
..I would have looked into the future of the 21st century and noted that the whole world was on the very cusp of entering the technological age, and on the basis that we had a severe CRISIS on our hands, in education and technological innovation, and were about to lose our competitive edge in an increasingly competitive global marketplace, I would have spent that TWO TRILLION dollars on all manner of infrastructure, including a REAL information superhighway in the form of terrabit bandwidth fiber optic cabling to every school and home in the country, as well as various Civil Infrastructure initiatives, including high speed and light commutor rail corridors between all the major urban centers, improving dramatically the speed of exchange of people and goods and services, as well as the continued joy of community living, or a MAJOR national upgrade in other words, on par with JFK's landing on the moon initiative.
Then we could have turnedd our attention to the Education System, recognizing that our HUMAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL development, is indeed our greatest national asset and latant potentiality, for securing a vital edge within the larger context of an emerging global civilization / global village.
In other words, I would have tried to discern and do the will of God, instead of Satan, simple as that.
I honestly think there might have been GIVEN the wrong blueprint for success by the wrong people, people like Cheney, Bush Sr. and their ilk. &/or whoever they take their marching orders from..
May there be weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth...
Originally posted by Ophiuchus13
I read that member's will have "date's" like a repulican paired with a democrat...Meaning that the floor will no be split like it has for the past 200+ year's with republican on ones side and democrat's on the other...it's almost like they want it even so that when obama make's his pointless State of the union address where he will say eveything is ok just keep your head in the sand...when all the democrats stand up and applaud it wont look one sided cause they will be all mixed in together...
Originally posted by kinda kurious
Originally posted by Ophiuchus13
I read that member's will have "date's" like a repulican paired with a democrat...Meaning that the floor will no be split like it has for the past 200+ year's with republican on ones side and democrat's on the other...it's almost like they want it even so that when obama make's his pointless State of the union address where he will say eveything is ok just keep your head in the sand...when all the democrats stand up and applaud it wont look one sided cause they will be all mixed in together...
Speaking of "head in the sand" if you'd raise yours and do a little reasearch ON YOUR OWN you'd learn it is intended to be a show of unity and civility in light AZ tragedy.
Geez, why do the people who just read Drudge or WND and spewing the same nonsense refer to others as sheeple?