It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
A controversial bill handing President Obama power over privately owned computer systems during a "national cyberemergency," and prohibiting any review by the court system, will return this year.
Internet companies should not be alarmed by the legislation, first introduced last summer by Sens. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.) and Susan Collins (R-Maine), a Senate aide said last week
"We're not trying to mandate any requirements for the entire Internet, the entire Internet backbone,"
"crucial components that form our nation's critical infrastructure."
Originally posted by Portugoal
What does that even mean?
"We're not trying to mandate any requirements for the entire Internet, the entire Internet backbone,"
"crucial components that form our nation's critical infrastructure."
Originally posted by Sparta
Are we talking just US internet use? or would it be killed for every user worldwide?
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Here is a perfect analogy.
You are in danger of getting wet.
Therefore, to prevent this, we will pour water on you.
See? Problem Solved.
Originally posted by detachedindividual
From what I understand...
This will be an American kill-switch and will not influence other nations.
It will not cover only infrastructure. If this were the case they would not be demanding access to private business sectors.
Even if it were, you can bet your butt they'd expand the measures within five years. You will end up like China.
Do you people really still trust them? Look at how various laws have been changed, massaged and manipulated to basically destroy so many of your rights already. ...
There is absolutely no reason why a kill-switch is needed. The same could be achieved through individual shut off of infrastructure if an attack happens. Corporations manage it every day, and yet a government cannot? Yeah, right!
Originally posted by Portugoal
reply to post by muzzleflash
95% chance it won't happen (until they find a reason to use it just to joke aabout how they were able to pass such a stupid bill and get away with it)
Originally posted by backinblack
Ever been at a local swimming pool when it starts raining??
I'm always amazed how many people rush out of the water and seek cover from the rain.
Originally posted by Portugoal
"We're not trying to mandate any requirements for the entire Internet, the entire Internet backbone,"
What does that even mean?
"crucial components that form our nation's critical infrastructure."
Oh that's clear. Essentially whatever the US government says, at their own discretion, is a "national cyberemergency" will bring kill the internet with a "presidential decree."
I know this has been brought up on ATS before but it's important to bring up once more because it's going to be considered by government yet again. This thing won't go away and EVENTUALLY it will get passed.
www.cbsnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by muzzleflash
Originally posted by Portugoal
reply to post by muzzleflash
95% chance it won't happen (until they find a reason to use it just to joke aabout how they were able to pass such a stupid bill and get away with it)
Touche'
I am not worthy!
Originally posted by backinblack
Ever been at a local swimming pool when it starts raining??
I'm always amazed how many people rush out of the water and seek cover from the rain.
Actually I have seen that!
Holy crap we are screwed!!
There gonna cut us off to prevent us from getting cut off!
Originally posted by Golf66
There are other useful kill switches I can think of like killing the lights in congress so they can't convene and make more stupid laws; that would be more helpful than the internet switch.