It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by xynephadyn
The Smithsonian institute, has from the beginning, been systematically been removing "things that dont belong" from modern history. In does not surprise me that this "doesent exist" anymore. Its been completely excavated and boxed in some wherehouse like the arc of the covenant in the indiana jones movies. Sad but so true. I loathe the Smithsonian. I wanted to be an archeologist growing up, but when I learned what they did with real discoveries, I quickly learned it was a waste of effort.
Originally posted by xynephadyn
The Smithsonian institute, has from the beginning, been systematically been removing "things that dont belong" from modern history. In does not surprise me that this "doesent exist" anymore. Its been completely excavated and boxed in some wherehouse like the arc of the covenant in the indiana jones movies. Sad but so true. I loathe the Smithsonian. I wanted to be an archeologist growing up, but when I learned what they did with real discoveries, I quickly learned it was a waste of effort.
Originally posted by Klassified
Originally posted by xynephadyn
The Smithsonian institute, has from the beginning, been systematically been removing "things that dont belong" from modern history. In does not surprise me that this "doesent exist" anymore. Its been completely excavated and boxed in some wherehouse like the arc of the covenant in the indiana jones movies. Sad but so true. I loathe the Smithsonian. I wanted to be an archeologist growing up, but when I learned what they did with real discoveries, I quickly learned it was a waste of effort.
Not only that, but the opening to whatever was found there now has bars over the entrance. Even if you did go there you couldn't get in. For the "pics or it never happened crowd". There is a picture of those bars on the net. Search long enough, you may find it. I've seen it, but I've never been able to find it a second time. So I guess it never happened. But if someone does find it, please post it here.
Let us also not forget, that the Smithsonian is a federal agency first and foremost. They have no allegiance to us.
ETA: It has been said, without proof I might add, the Smithsonian has been caught more than once dumping artifacts that don't fit the paradigm into the ocean by the shiploads. I wouldn't put it past them.edit on 24-1-2011 by Klassified because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by skeetontheconspiracy
Something very intriguing about this event. Many many people know that the Smithsonianstated no such S.A. Jordan was ever associated with them. But in the 1911 smithsonian annual report, it list the name S.A. Jordan as a field achaeologist. Why do they claim he never worked for them when he was listed in an official report as working for them? Makes you ask yourself if this story has some truth behind it.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com