Hi-Res Color Moon Images Reveal Monuments, Conical Towers and Gem-like Domes

Originally posted by keyseeker
reply to post by The Shrike

 

Shrike, your gray scale Aristarchus image demonstrates why this USGS data archive is so important. The public has been misled unto thinking the moon is gray by color desaturated images. (snip)

The public has NOT been misled by NASA at all. There are plenty of lunar photos taken with color emulsion film from orbiting astronauts to astronauts on the lunar surface. You claim is bogus. Below are two lunar photos taken by astronauts using color film and the surface is grey!

Lunar surface in color
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f27b50c97d28.jpg[/atsimg]

Lunar surface in color
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7066c8d9f93c.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by The Shrike
Here's what Aristarchus Crater really looks like, not that fantasy blue image that's obviously been colorized.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e73237ab20af.gif[/atsimg]

No Shrike,
Sorry.

Newsflash for you~
The moon is not grey/black and white!

And if youve ever actually looked at Aristarchus crater through a telescope yourself..
You would know how ridiculous you sound..
and would not have made such a stupid post.

"Fantasy blue" thats been colorized"?

Nice big FAIL for you, mate.
Why even post, if you're just going to post pure BS?


Aristarchus DOES look BLUE, even through a small 5 inch telescope!

Deny Ignorance much?
Ok, embrace it then.

reply to post by VenomVile.6


Outline of potential humanoid figure statue monument referenced in OP.
Source: NASA Clementine

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/80ee0e98a949.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/24b8ac8fea2b.png[/atsimg]


Compare to Statues on Mars discovered by iamonkey
on ATS 2008 thread

reply to post by The Shrike


Shrike, your so called NASA color image is an example of their deception.

Look at the color calibration swatch on the tripod, Orange is the only color on it!

This image has been gray-scaled and selectively colorized!

GOTCHA!!

Originally posted by The Shrike
The public has NOT been misled by NASA at all. There are plenty of lunar photos taken with color emulsion film from orbiting astronauts to astronauts on the lunar surface. You claim is bogus. Below are two lunar photos taken by astronauts using color film and the surface is grey!

Lunar surface in color
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/f27b50c97d28.jpg[/atsimg]

Really? If that is true then why do I see THIS picture on a NASA website? The Gnomon color chart matches yours exactly, but the rest of the image is gray scale. So it's obvious they painted in that orange soil

Besides I already proved a long time ago that NASA Gray Scales the Moon...



Source
www.nasaimages.org...:Orange-Soil-Discovery

NASA publicity release AS11-44-6552




ORIGINAL taken by Apollo AS11-44-6552



So nice try Shrike olde buddy, but NASA does indeed gray scale the moon

Originally posted by The Shrike
You're not going to find any " Monuments, Conical Towers and Gem-like Domes".

"Gem Like Domes" Oh yeah one of my favorites and this one was taken by a 10 inch scope from Earth



This is the same one taken by Clementine



Seems sometimes the lights are on and sometimes they are not

Did you know that the lights actually DIMMED when Clementine flew over? This phenomenon was observed by over 100 astronomers who happened to be watching at the time

REPORTS of curious flashes and fleeting clouds on the Moon may not be figments of wild imaginations, astronomers say. A new look at observations by the American satellite Clementine show that a small area on the Moon's surface darkened and reddened in April 1994. Why this happened remains a mystery.

For hundreds of years, people have reported seeing flashes, short-lived clouds and other brief changes on the Moon's surface. But astronomers have never been able to confirm the sightings. "The events were observed on many occasions, but most astronomers don't believe in them," says Bonnie Buratti of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California. On 23 April 1994, around a hundred amateur astronomers reported seeing a possible darkening of the Moon, lasting 40 minutes, near the edge of the bright lunar crater Aristarchus. At the same time, the US Department of Defense's Clementine satellite was mapping the lunar surface.

www.newscientist.com...

I have a lot more on that glowing Gem... but hey... I already did that thread

Unfortunately I can't add much to this discussion as I am only familiar with the moon claims in passing (very interested but there is only so much time in day!) I've been seriously into photography as a hobby for 20 years and those images definitely look grayed to me.

As for the original post I see what you're seeing but would like to see some shadows to help get an idea of perspective. I think as presented there is no definite proof but it definitely looks promising to me.

How many of us would give all our extra money for a year to fund just one private hi res survey of some choice areas on the moon? Give it another 5 or so years it will be possible... Who wants to start the fund?

reply to post by keyseeker


You have to do better then this. Its a blury pic first off all, how can you see anything that confirms your claim. Surely you have seen Capricorn One, with O J Simpson, a great movie also stars that D.A. From Law and Order.

Originally posted by keyseeker
reply to post by VenomVile.6

 

Outline of potential humanoid figure statue monument referenced in OP.
Source: NASA Clementine

Monument? Sigh. You do realize you're looking at the surface from the top, there is no 3D structure in the surface discoloration you think is a statue.

Sorry Keyseeker, I've enjoyed the thread so far especially with Zorgons input but sadly your claim is like one of those ink blotch tests, you see what you want in it.

I normally don't even open these threads but for some reason I did.

I just have to say that by saying you can make out humanoid shapes, or beings of some sort you really debunk yourself.

Do you realize how massive these creatures would be if you could really see them in those pictures?

Originally posted by keyseeker
reply to post by VenomVile.6

 

Outline of potential humanoid figure statue monument referenced in OP.
Source: NASA Clementine

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/80ee0e98a949.png[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/24b8ac8fea2b.png[/atsimg]


Compare to Statues on Mars discovered by iamonkey
on ATS 2008 thread

As we are looking at the images from above that would mean that the shape you have made into a humanoid sitting on a chair is actually lying down sitting on a chair...

Originally posted by Mclaneinc

Sorry Keyseeker, I've enjoyed the thread so far especially with Zorgons input but sadly your claim is like one of those ink blotch tests, you see what you want in it.

exactly and I see the UK

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/55c51d0116e3.jpeg[/atsimg]

reply to post by Versa


It must be a Kuwait financed resort

reply to post by keyseeker
Real fascinating stuff, I wish I had someone here with me that could explain the pictures.I have always been interested in anything the moon since the first apollo moon mission,but Iam really lousy at reading pictures such as these I don't have a clue what I supposed to be seeing.

Originally posted by The Shrike

Originally posted by keyseeker
reply to post by zorgon

 

Thank you Zorgon, those images are beautiful. My OP was just a tiny corner of a larger image. I'm exploring the dataset now ... will post more soon.

Why bother? You blew it with your OP, you spoke loud and didn't say a damn thing! Look at the replies you've received because your thread title has been misrepresented. You're not going to find any " Monuments, Conical Towers and Gem-like Domes". You're just dreaming and thinking that you can fool us. You've failed. Better men have tried and they also came up short.

If any mods are reading this, wrap this thread up, it shouldn't be allowed to continue, nothing here to discuss.

yep

reply to post by keyseeker


...and blue...and green.

"Gotcha!"

reply to post by Adept_Zero


MORE COLOR MOON IMAGES - The Moon is not monochromatic ash and steel gray.

Most people think the Moon is gray/white because we look up through a atmosphere that scatters color.

Many published images are gray-scaled, conforming to expectations.

The Moon is apparently sugar brown, olive, dark purple and other colors including
luminous gem tones.

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/a3833c470886.png[/atsimg]

Source: NASA / JPL photojournal.jpl.nasa.gov...

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/016c12078e2f.png[/atsimg]

Source: ser.sese.asu.edu...

if the monuments are real, who do you made them, and what happened?