It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson Says Chemtrail Death Dumps Must Be Stopped

page: 12
278
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:21 AM
link   
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


Quite happy to eat all those things eh? Like that will offer protection?

Breathing in those chemicals which are dangeous, never mind what actually ends up being absorbed by the skin

There is protective clothing easy enough to purchase, yet food is the answer lolol Deny Igorance eh?



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:27 AM
link   
Its worth pointing out that the british government has already admitted to spraying its population with chemicals as part of experiments.

Although this article of from 2002, I think the last parts says it all.




Asked whether such tests are still being carried out, she said: 'It is not our policy to discuss ongoing research.



Millions were in germ war tests



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:27 AM
link   
reply to post by JohnnyCanuck
 


Speak up sir, you're begging to sound like one of those posters who know something but just can't seem to enunciate, for 10 pages, I followed HST's trail down the rabbit hole so far I heard of peado snuff movies, Moloch, shapeshifters, crack, hookers and cowboys.

So spit it out and either save us from embarrassment, time wasting or diversions, thanks.

On the surface this looks big S&F to wcitizen, Chemtrails are obviously longer, longer lasting and more prevalent than the contrails of my childhood, do they show up in the sky's over Russia or China?



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ellen15
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


Quite happy to eat all those things eh? Like that will offer protection?

Breathing in those chemicals which are dangeous, never mind what actually ends up being absorbed by the skin

There is protective clothing easy enough to purchase, yet food is the answer lolol Deny Igorance eh?


Instead of commenting constructive, by learning me there are protective clothes to buy. You burn me like that.

Wonder what happened to you? Food most defin is an answer, because you lower your intake.(simple science)
I dont believe clothes have protecitce capabilities, it still lands on your head, goes in your longs etc.





edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


if it were airborne pollutants / chemicals / viruses or other such things, a protective suit, respiratory mask / sealed buildings and decontamination procedures would be the only real protection.


Catching on finally!

Easy enough to purchase @ your local Workplace, Health and SafetSupplier or Good quality Hardware Store, many face masks can even be purchased at the chemist!

Remember

Many in these threads claimed they witness spraying regularly in their area or surrounding areas

Many in these threads list the toxic chemicals found in these chem trails, which are hazardeous to ones health and well being and ecology

YET NONE of you have bothered to PROTECT YOURSELVES!

Stocking up on guns and ammo in the US wont protect you from chem trails

Imagine if you spent some of that money on protective gear and actually WORE IT when you witnessed your area being sprayed



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours

Originally posted by Ellen15
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


Quite happy to eat all those things eh? Like that will offer protection?

Breathing in those chemicals which are dangeous, never mind what actually ends up being absorbed by the skin

There is protective clothing easy enough to purchase, yet food is the answer lolol Deny Igorance eh?


Instead of commenting constructive, by learning me there are protective clothes to buy. You burn me like that.

Wonder what happened to you? Food most defin is an answer, because you lower your intake.(simple science)
I dont believe clothes have protecitce capabilities, it still lands on your head, goes in your longs etc.


You eat the foods which have been sprayed on

ADD .. I never said clothes, I posted "protective gear" (google it)
edit on 17-1-2011 by Ellen15 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Ellen15

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


if it were airborne pollutants / chemicals / viruses or other such things, a protective suit, respiratory mask / sealed buildings and decontamination procedures would be the only real protection.


Catching on finally!

Easy enough to purchase @ your local Workplace, Health and SafetSupplier or Good quality Hardware Store, many face masks can even be purchased at the chemist!

Remember

Many in these threads claimed they witness spraying regularly in their area or surrounding areas

Many in these threads list the toxic chemicals found in these chem trails, which are hazardeous to ones health and well being and ecology

YET NONE of you have bothered to PROTECT YOURSELVES!

Stocking up on guns and ammo in the US wont protect you from chem trails

Imagine if you spent some of that money on protective gear and actually WORE IT when you witnessed your area being sprayed


First i live in the Netherlands.
Second i do stay inside as much as possible
third I buy biological food.
Fourth I am not going to walk around with a mask.
fifth Why are you atacking me?

ADD .. I never said clothes, I posted "protective gear" (google it) Sorry for misinterpreting you.
edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:46 AM
link   
Im not attacking you

My comments are geared at Members who claim they witness these chem trails on a regular bases in their area and surrounding area and do NOTHING to protect themselves and these same Members who make excuses why they wont wear protective gear

I find that totally ignorant!
edit on 17-1-2011 by Ellen15 because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-1-2011 by Ellen15 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:47 AM
link   
It takes a lot to get a star or a flag from me,......this one is earned. How can you possibly refute the testimony of this guy? Former FBI Chief.



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Ellen15
 


as previously mentioned, it would take more than protective clothing and a face mask....also due to air circulation, people would have to only spend time indoors in sealed buildings and undertake decontamination routines after being outdoors....and that is if it wasn't already in the water / food chain (inc organic) / household materials etc etc.

Most people have lives to lead and jobs to sustain their families and the wearing of a chemical protection suit and mask, whilst not ensuring adequate protection would also be contrary to dress codes in workplaces.

Until there is sufficient proof of exactly which chemicals are involved, people wouldn't really see fit to wearing something that may not be the correct protection.



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phenomium
It takes a lot to get a star or a flag from me,......this one is earned. How can you possibly refute the testimony of this guy? Former FBI Chief.


There is just to much info coming out, on everything. Where put the focus on?
I agree, this should be taken very seriously

Star&flag for you.



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours

Originally posted by Ellen15

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


if it were airborne pollutants / chemicals / viruses or other such things, a protective suit, respiratory mask / sealed buildings and decontamination procedures would be the only real protection.


Catching on finally!

Easy enough to purchase @ your local Workplace, Health and SafetSupplier or Good quality Hardware Store, many face masks can even be purchased at the chemist!

Remember

Many in these threads claimed they witness spraying regularly in their area or surrounding areas

Many in these threads list the toxic chemicals found in these chem trails, which are hazardeous to ones health and well being and ecology

YET NONE of you have bothered to PROTECT YOURSELVES!

Stocking up on guns and ammo in the US wont protect you from chem trails

Imagine if you spent some of that money on protective gear and actually WORE IT when you witnessed your area being sprayed


First i live in the Netherlands.
Second i do stay inside as much as possible
third I buy biological food.
Fourth I am not going to walk around with a mask.
fifth Why are you atacking me?

ADD .. I never said clothes, I posted "protective gear" (google it) Sorry for misinterpreting you.
edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



The way I see it, there's no need for fighting.....you both have valid points. Both ingestions are equally as destructive as the other. We should all write to Congress and send them this link, but don't send it from ATS, send it from it's original source. Sending it from ATS will prove only to demonize ATS further, even if it's correct information.



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:56 AM
link   
reply to post by Phenomium
 



The way I see it, there's no need for fighting





edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 04:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by TribeOfManyColours
reply to post by Phenomium
 



The way I see it, there's no need for fighting





edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)


well said!



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Ellen15
 


as previously mentioned, it would take more than protective clothing and a face mask....also due to air circulation, people would have to only spend time indoors in sealed buildings and undertake decontamination routines after being outdoors....and that is if it wasn't already in the water / food chain (inc organic) / household materials etc etc.

Most people have lives to lead and jobs to sustain their families and the wearing of a chemical protection suit and mask, whilst not ensuring adequate protection would also be contrary to dress codes in workplaces.

Until there is sufficient proof of exactly which chemicals are involved, people wouldn't really see fit to wearing something that may not be the correct protection.


Protective gear is worn daily at some work places which does protect the worker!

Trademen, Lab workers, etc etc

Interesting..... All of a sudden the call for more proof lolol



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by traditionaldrummer

Originally posted by unityemissions
I would also like to mention that just because someone may be incorrect towards certain assumptions, doesn't mean he doesn't have a high level of reasoning capabilities.


I agree with you 100%. There are some incredibly intelligent people in the world that believe some weird things for bad reasons.


There's simply too much for any one person to fully grasp in our limited time on this rock. I think it reasonable to assume that practically everyone has at least one false assumption in their beliefs, including you and I !!!


Again, I agree 100%. I have believed some weird things in the past and probably still do. I'm trying more and more to believe true things for the right reasons and avoid fallacious thinking (such as the appeal to authority). Whatever it takes to get to the real truth


This man approaches the subject from a mature and logical perspective that I wish some of you would also take.

Another mans words hold less credence to me than any piece of circumstantial evidence, His past employment gives his statements no more validity, and him bringing up the recent deaths and fish/birds etc etc give me more reason to doubt his sincerity.



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
reply to post by weedwhacker
 


sigh...

with all due respect " there are more things between heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy"

if you don't' believe in concentration camps here in the USA you need to talk to a few Nisei
or to our autochthonous tribes-folk.


thats becausee one day he will be runnning them, and laugh in your face because you are on other side of the fence.

yea anywho, if the smoking gun for chemtrails will pop up people like him will still be here calling you guys for looney`s bla di bla ^^




posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:15 AM
link   
lets stay on Ted Gunderson, can we take his statement seriously?
If we do, what do we do next. We are being softkilled, by accumulation of toxic substances.


edit on 17-1-2011 by TribeOfManyColours because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:23 AM
link   
reply to post by TribeOfManyColours
 


what can we do? if they see we are talking about it wouldn`t you think they make it more secret from us?

its only talk here on ats, no action, NO im not talking about loughnner shootings action ><





truth will not set us free just make us look foolish



posted on Jan, 17 2011 @ 05:23 AM
link   
I have done a bit of reading on this since I have never realy bothered with this before, I didnt bother searching for "contrails" or "chemtrails", I just based it on the UK experiments, I have found some interesting stuff. (inc alleged video & declassified documents)

Heres a site hosted by an "Open Govt Campaigner", whos stumbled into this when looking into one specific trial.

www.nr23.net...

BBC article written by the creator of this website.

Another article from the gaurdian, from 1999.

The Idependant,also back in 1999

BBC Article on apparent trails on unwitting elderly and soldiers at the same facility. From 2000

The Times, Porton Down guinea-pigs get apology (& an out of court settlement) from 2008.

I think thats enough for now, but there seems to be plenty out there, I dont know about the US but the british government IMO HAS sprayed & used its citizens as part of secret expiriments, are they still doing it? I dont know, however the simple fact they have done it before means there is no reason they will not do it again! (assuming they ever stopped in the first place)

I found plenty more stuff out there, however I am trying to ensure everything is from "proper" sources and steer clear of the more "out there" or unknown websites.



new topics

top topics



 
278
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join