ATTENTION EVERYONE.
Please don't stray from the subject of this thread.Please don't make strawman arguments,ask questions or make comments that don't relate to the
thread.This thread is about the tail section of Flight 77.This thread is not about the other pieces of debris we've seen photos of.Its not about
witnesses,passengers,etc.And I don't care if you don't believe it wasn't an inside job.Save the "There was no conspiracy..You're crazy" comments.You
can believe whatever you want,but make your point by debating MY CLAIMS and nothing else.
Questions & comments like this are totally unwanted:
"What about the passengers?"
"What about the witnesses?"
"How do you know?Were you there?"
"There was no conspiracy,nutcase."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Ok.So I've seen the little pieces of missile debris and/or plane pieces that were planted at the Pentagon.Not impressed.Every photo I've seen of
debris,the debris was small and/or light enough to be pulled out of a gym bag or hidden inside the building.And mind you,these pictures could've been
taken any time.They could easily be faked.But when you look at the actual footage from that day,you don't see anything.Not a #in piece of anything
there.Even the reporters said they didnt see anything.Its just a hole.Do you realize how ridiculous that is?
You could easily plant the small,portable pieces of debris we've all been shown photos of,could you not?Of course you could.You could easily hide
those small pieces in the building beforehand to be found later,could you not?Of course you could.That is all possible,right?Of course.
But what you could not do,is plant a tail section at the Pentagon.That would be impossible.There's no way you could plant a tail section in or in
front of the building without it being noticed.And that is where they messed up at.
The tail section on a plane is 44 ft tall.Its practically a big 3-4 story house made of metal.And it always survives a crash.The hole in the Pentagon
was described as 16-20 ft big at best.It obviously didn't go into that hole.So where did the it go?Are you gonna tell me it totally blew up?All 44ft
of it?I know they say this plane was goin 500mph & it was a nasty crash,but complete vaporization?Not even 10% left (That would be a 4.4 ft piece.Bout
a small child.)?Really think about that.Most planes crash goin 300mph.If the tail always survives a crash of 300mph in full,then even if 500mph was to
do much more damage,it shouldnt do anymore than 50% more damage.That would still leave a 22 ft tall piece in the front of the building.Lets be
generous & slash that in half.Thats still an 11 ft tall piece.Thats 4 ft taller than Shaq.We should see some remenance of it in front of the building.
Bottom line:It is impossible that a plane hit the Pentagon.The tail section on a plane is 44 ft tall.Thats about 2/3rds as tall as the Pentagon.About
5 stories.If a plane had hit the Pentagon,the tail section would have had to 1)Cut through every floor in its path. or 2)Snap off upon impact with the
building.As we can clearly see from the photos & footage of the Pentagon,the tail section did not cut throught the floors above ground level that
would've been in it the tail section's path.In fact,prior to the fire induced collapse,all floors above impact zone,are completely in tact.And clearly
the tail section did not snap off upon impact,as we don't see ANY piece of this 44 ft tall piece of metal in front of the building.
So it didn't penetrate the building & it didn't snap off to be seen in the front lawn.So how do you explain its absence?What..did it snap off,but was
vaporized by the preceding explosion & fire?Are we to believe that the explosion was powerful enough to instantly vaporize a 44ft tall piece of
metal,but not powerful enough to instantly vaporize or demolish the entire?
In case you can't grasp the magnitude of how massive a 44ft tall tail section is,here are some pictures (Note:Note all of these tail sections are from
Boeing 747s or 757s.Some of them are from other plane models.Some are from much smaller planes.But they all go to serve the same point.THAT TAIL
SECTIONS ARE HUGE) :
This one's my favorite.We can see that plane has pretty much exploded and/or burned to almost nothing (As is proposed to be the case with
Flight77),yet the tail section is still fully intact.
edit on 15-1-2011 by youngdrodeau because: (no
reason given)
edit on 15-1-2011 by youngdrodeau because: Needed to add a few things
edit on 15-1-2011 by youngdrodeau
because: Needed to add a few things