It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Americanist
The formula or table . . .
And this is supposed to help explain how 1+8=18?
Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Arbitrageur
The formula or table goes like this:
1,2,4,8,7,5
3,9,6,6,9,3,3,9
You'll have to replace = with the actual word equal in the event it's still confusing.
So if he adds 1+8, is the answer 9, or 18? And where are the codes that show this? Or are you disagreeing with Americanist's encoding explanation?
Originally posted by cplouffe
reply to post by Arbitrageur
He is just taking the numbers and figuring out their digital root. And then getting the patterns based on 1-9. Because all of the numbers can be added until they are down to a single digit.
Originally posted by micpsi
If you want to learn TRUE Pythagorean mathematics and see its awesome power at work, stop wasting your time with childish jigsaw puzzles and spend the next six months studying the research material and articles at:
smphillips.8m.com...
Their author, Dr Phillips, a theoretical physicist who has studied with Nobel Prize winners. . . has discovered the amazing, mathematical connection between religions and science. His work reveals overwhelming, mathematical evidence for the existence of a Transcendental Intelligence that expresses its Divine perfection in Pythagorean terms. His work also explains how superstrings, music, DNA and sacred geometries are all manifestations of a universal pattern that is prescribed by the ancient Hebrew Divine Names. He has uncovered a new level of Kabbalah never suspected before now, and he has shown that the Pythagorean tetractys is the key which unlocks information about holistic systems that is contained in the geometry of the Tree of Life.
If you are looking for a TRUE "theory of everything" (only it is not a theory!) that applies to all holistic systems, not just subatomic particles, please study his pioneering work at his website.
And this is supposed to help explain how 1+8=18?
So 18 does or does not equal 9? I think you already agreed that it doesn't yet Rodin claims it does.
Originally posted by beebs
No, that is backwards. 9*2=18. 1+8=9
If you are still at 1+8, then I guess since you are using the system, you know it corresponds (--->) to 18. But 1+8 does not equal 18.
I have something called a "BS detector". If you don't know what I'm talking about, here are some tips in how to develop one:
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Is Rodin's system wrong as well as "childish" - making the Rodin Coil a piece of junk and showing that his endorsers are uninformed?
Now anyone with a finely tuned BS detector would realize this list is too good to be true at a glance, even before doing research and checking for source material. They actually did cite some research but it was totally bogus.
Under the heading of “What specific benefits can I expect?” they have the gall to list the following:
Kinoki Detox Foot Pads may help:
• Absorb toxins released by the body.
• Relieve the burden on the immune system.
• Assist in the natural cleansing of the lymphatic system.
• Assist in the extraction of toxins from the body.
• Support normal blood circulation.
• Assist in the extraction of heavy metals from the body.
• Improve quality of sleep.
• Promote vibrant health and wellness.
And then again they “may” not! Nowhere on the site is there even one shred of scientific support for any of their claims.
Apparently they couldn't prove their claims to the feds.
Foot pads — A dirty foot pad may not mean a clean body after all. At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal judge has banned marketers of Kinoki “Detox” Foot Pads from selling a wide variety of products. The FTC had charged that the marketers falsely claimed that the adhesive pads — which users would attach to the soles of their feet — could treat numerous illnesses and medical conditions. In a settlement announced Thursday, a judge banned Yehuda Levin and his company, Xacta 3000 Inc., from selling any dietary supplements, food, drug or medical device. The FTC had accused Levin of falsely claiming that the foot pads removed toxins from the body.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I have something called a "BS detector".
Originally posted by DaRAGE
check out the flower vertexs.
Too bad, you really should get one too.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I have something called a "BS detector".
I'm not interested in your BS detector, but I am interested in your comments about Dr Phillips' work, if you understand it.
Stephen Phillips opens his paper with a sober and sobering discussion of the
difficulties involved in gaining scientific acceptance for so-called "paranormal"
phenomena. Unfortunately, while he is evidently attempting to address
some of those difficulties in his historical analysis of putative observations by
Theosophists A. Besant and C. W. Leadbeater, he appears oblivious both to the
generic pitfalls of such ex post facto analysis, and to the specific flaws of his
own argument. On the whole, it seems that Phillips' paper has weakened,
rather than strengthened, the public case for the existence of micro-psi.
To depart briefly from the traditional third person of scientific discourse -
it should be obvious, if only from my institutional affiliation, that I have no
particular axe to grind against micro-psi as a concept. Indeed, I would welcome
the publication of strong evidence for the reality of such a phenomenon.
It is disappointing to see, in this paper, a few precious nuggets of such evidence
obscured by irrelevant detail and speculative theorizing. Phillips could
have accomplished a great deal more for his subject by abandoning his insistence
on the particular and detailed accuracy of Leadbeater's and Besant's visions.
Observational Evidence and Special Pleading
The worst and most overarching problem with Phillips' presentation is its
reliance on what appears to be special pleading. Where Besant and Leadbeater
are in accordance with current knowledge, their accuracy is quite rightly declared
as evidence for an objective reality behind their subjective visions. But
is the same standard of evaluation applied when their reported images are at
variance with current knowledge? No....
Conclusions
Aside from a few tantalizing bits of historical evidence, "Extrasensory Perception
of Subatomic Particles" consists almost in its entirety of unsupported,
frequently self-contradictory, speculation. The two-body-fusion model of
micro-psi, as discussed above, introduces as many problems as it solves. The
subquark theory, with its baroque elaboration at the superstring level, gives
every appearance of being an ad hoe imposition whose only justification is
that it allows one to interpret every element of Besant's and Leadbeater's perceptions
as physically real. Phillips does not seem to understand that far more
support of micro-psi as a valid experimental tool would be required before its
findings could themselves be used to support such an overburden of speculative
physics. Neither does he seem to understand that, lacking such empirical
support for micro-psi, the theoretical parts of his paper do not strengthen his
position, but instead weaken it, since they appear to be driven not by a priori
theoretical concerns but instead by an effort to vindicate Besant and Leadbeater
in every observational particular.
Thanks for the explanation.
Originally posted by cplouffe
Does that help? That is how my mind sees it.