It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I see no reason to doubt the existence of Russell P Blake, the former Microsoft research guy.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
blake must exist - "he" wrote a reference to Rodin that is on Rense
www.rense.com...
Whether he wrote what Rodin posted, what specifically his role was or is with Rodin (as mentioned on Rodin's site when he says "Mr. Rodin's work has suffered from a lack of adequate scientific attention, and I am sure that as the research momentum builds and the proper relationship between the Rodin Torus and conventional science is fully understood, both areas of endeavor will attain new heights. I am very much looking forward to playing a role in this adventure."), and what he's doing now are less clear.
Originally posted by FequalsForce
. . . Salk, who is dead . . . never a physician during the entire time Rodin has been alive . . .
Hans A. Nieper, another Rodin endorser, died in 1998.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by FequalsForce
. . . Salk, who is dead . . . never a physician during the entire time Rodin has been alive . . .
Salk died in 1995. What's your point?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Vacuum can be thought of as containing an infinite amount of energy. It doesn't mean that it can be tapped.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
There is no disagreement.
Wiki:
But since only differences in energy are physically measurable, the infinity can be removed by renormalization.
So you have an artifact of quantum field theory.
Basically look over "zero point field", "vacuum energy" and other such links on the Wiki.
This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. See the talk page for details. WikiProject Physics or the Physics Portal may be able to help recruit an expert. (November 2010)
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
It's convenient to use dead people for undocumented assertions, because they aren't alive to dispute the claims we make.
In fact Rodin doesn't list any date at all for the communication he alleges to have received from Dr. Nieper.
markorodin.com...
i wonder what the people listed would say when contacted about their involvement with Rodin...well, except Salk, who is dead. And was never a physician during the entire time Rodin has been alive, but thats been covered.
Originally posted by FequalsForce
reply to post by Mary Rose
you need to read better.
i wonder what the people listed would say when contacted about their involvement with Rodin...well, except Salk, who is dead. And was never a physician during the entire time Rodin has been alive, but thats been covered.
No I don't think FequalsForce needs any assistance from me and yes you need to "read better". You asked him about Salk, I didn't say anything about Salk (though if I wanted to I would have), so I can't really see how that answers the question you asked him, that's why I'm saying you need to read better. I'm just skeptical of testimony from dead people if it's not documented somewhere reliable.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by Arbitrageur
FequalsForce needs your assistance?
You have a habit of answering questions put to other members.
The last working demonstrator promptly destroyed, what? They didn't even finish the sentence. Did they mean "was destroyed" or "destroyed itself"? The only thing I'm sure that's destroyed is any credibility with the ultimate "dog ate my homework" excuse.
On March 26 2002, Tom Bearden announced the arrival of the MEG technology (Motionless Electrical Generator). This device was supposed to be in mass production by 2003, and promised unlimited energy from the vacuum, to answer mankind's power needs. Promoted through JLNlabs[4], Cheniere.org[5] and an Egroup called "MEG Builders"[6], the device was even written up in Vol. 14., No. 1, 2001, Foundations of Physics Letters[7]. As of 2005, the MEG is still not in production, and Tom Bearden claims he needs about $11 million to develop it to a viable commercial form. [8] Tom also admits he presently has no working prototype, stating the 'last working demonstrator promptly destroyed'.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
And it's a public forum, anybody can answer in a public forum.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Also Bearden, another Rodin testimonial source, is telling lies. . .
That part is fact, he said in 2002 his "perpetual motion machine" would go into production in 2003...it didn't. Not an opinion.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Your opinion is duly noted.
So what?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
So what?
Things often do not go as planned in life. That does not make him a crook.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Things often do not go as planned in life. That does not make him a crook.