"Vortex Based Mathematics by Marko Rodin"

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Arbitrageur

 

Speaking of which... It's safe to assume you understand the concept behind a warp drive, correct?

This may be negotiable, but then again, do you really understand the concept behind the marinara sauce? Do you, punk?

Originally posted by Mary Rose

Originally posted by 23432

I wonder what Marko is doing lately ?

It seems that it is up to Randy Powell and Daniel Nunez to continue R&D of vortex math

You are right. From what I've seen in the recent videos, Marko's mental health took a broad sweep to the worse (not to say that he was OK to begin with, but still). Daniel was a promising figure at first, and had the tinkerer mindset, but in the end he proved to be rather dumb (a huge disappointment for me, personally - sorry, people). Randy's middle name must be "Rant". All in all, the vortex math (which curiously does NOT employ any vertex at all, a fact that can only be lost on stupid people) is not doing very well. As an example, Randy can't do any physics or much of anything with the sudoku puzzle he claims is the "cutting edge research". Duh.

reply to post by Arbitrageur


On the topic of broad... Particles aren't detected. Fields denoting their possible presence is all you got.

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Arbitrageur

 

On the topic of broad... Particles aren't detected. Fields denoting their possible presence is all you got.

Dude, that's about the first thing you ever produced on ATS that I agree with. That being said, we describe our experience as a "particle". Case in point, when an enemy tank fires a shell at you, you don't really experience the tank, you do experience the shell. At the same time, you won't be in denial with regards to the presence of the tank. I hope so.

reply to post by buddhasystem


I've given you plenty enough ammo to piece things together... Unfortunately, you'll need a better mental picture to grasp my signature file.

As this thread has progressed, I've come to the conclusion that a properly placed question is more useful than providing the answer.

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by buddhasystem

 

I've given you plenty enough ammo to piece things together... Unfortunately, you'll need a better mental picture to grasp my signature file.

I don't presume to advise combat controllers how to best direct airstrikes. I was assuming that combat controllers would stay out of physics research, and turn the pomp dial way to the left.

As to the "ammo" you say you have provided: look, seriously, cat food doesn't work for humans. Graduate from a good college, and give me a call. I may be willing to talk.

reply to post by 23432


You're welcome.

The free archive is available: "15 February 2013, Vortex Electricity, Daniel Nunez, Randy Powell, The Energy Evolution"

Originally posted by Mary Rose
"15 February 2013, Vortex Electricity, Daniel Nunez, Randy Powell, The Energy Evolution"

Here is the YouTube video about the documentary project "Randy's Donuts" which was talked about:

Published on Feb 1, 2013

Who is Randy Powell and why is he claiming that a 9 digit pattern called Vortex Based Mathematics (V.B.M.), interconnects all of science, all of technology and all of nature around a Donut?

Most of us are familiar with Albert Einstein and most famously his theory on general relativity (E=MC2). Einstein also theorized another idea where he attempted to connect general relativity with the forces of electromagnetism as a unified field theory. Unfortunately, Einstein was never able to make this theoretical connection, even though his theory of general relativity suggested the possibility.

Decades later - Along comes Marko Rodin whose unique mathematical perspective has hailed him as the official discoverer of the 9 digit pattern that is the foundation for what is known as Vortex Based Mathematics.

Randy Powell being a student to Marko's work took the fundamental sequence and by implementing the formula into a 3-D model, the shape of a Donut revealed itself. Randy learned very soon that the shape of the Donut was the universal geometric design for maximum efficiency in energy transformation, and an ecological method by which the universe reprocesses matter.

V.B.M. gave Randy additional insight into explaining how everything in the Universe, from the elements of the periodic table, to why every pattern in nature - from the spiral in our galaxy, to our own DNA, are all toroidal based.

Randy's Donuts is Presented by TBLN Films in association with Neverending Light Productions.

Produced By:
Amardeep Kaleka, Curtis Hedges, J.D. Seraphine, Jose Escamilla, Laurie Knapp, Randy Powell, Reuben Langdon, Saskia Binder, Thomas Jane, and Tyler William Thurmond

Originally posted by Mary Rose
"15 February 2013, Vortex Electricity, Daniel Nunez, Randy Powell, The Energy Evolution"

Beginning at about 49:00 Daniel Nunez talks about putting some scissors into the first Rodin coil design he and his wife worked with, powering it with 120, the scissors flying across the room, and the scissors then being permanently magnetized with a south monopole.

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Arbitrageur

 

Speaking of which... It's safe to assume you understand the concept behind a warp drive, correct?

I've worked with imaginary numbers mathematically for specific purposes, and mathematically I can write down an expression for negative mass, but I have a hard time grasping the concept physically. I Imagine a discussion with my butcher along these lines:

Me: I'd like some steak.
Butcher: OK, the Usual? (He puts two steaks on the scale)
Me: No, less than that.
Butcher: (He removes a steak) OK, just one today then?
Me: No, less than that.
Butcher: (He removes a steak) OK, for what's on the scale now I give you really cheap price (he jokes, since the scale is now empty)
Me: No, less than that.
Butcher: Less than that? Sorry I don't know what you mean...the scale is empty, how can I put less on it?
Me: I don't know either, but if you had figured out how to do that, I might be able to make a warp drive.
Butcher: Say what?

So, that's a limitation of my understanding of warp drive theory...I don't comprehend negative mass very well physically, though I'd have no problems writing down equations for it, like -2kg + 2kg = 0kg. But I can write down lots of things that don't exist...so can other people, as demonstrated so well by Rodin and his black hole, among many other examples. If I ever see evidence for negative mass, and am able to understand it, then I'd understand the warp drive theory better.

calculations found that such a model would require negative mass, the existence of which has never been supported by any evidence

Originally posted by Americanist
reply to post by Arbitrageur

 

On the topic of broad...

I did say "broad", however in your case, perhaps "cosmic" might be more fitting, and don't forget random.

Particles aren't detected. Fields denoting their possible presence is all you got.

Buddhasystem actually agreed with you, sort of...is that a first? We define what particles and fields are. You inferring a particle isn't a particle is almost like Nassim Haramein inferring something like a cube doesn't have three dimensions...when by definition, it does. "Just say no" to "dictionary hijacking", and we can communicate better and live in peace and harmony...well, at least communicate better.

reply to post by Mary Rose

Beginning at about 49:00 Daniel Nunez talks about putting some scissors into the first Rodin coil design he and his wife worked with, powering it with 120, the scissors flying across the room, and the scissors then being permanently magnetized with a south monopole.

Talks about? I believe I would document that #!!!

Originally posted by Mary Rose

I would love to see President Obama's reaction to that...preferably live, so I can see the spontaneous look on his face.

Originally posted by buddhasystem
Randy can't do any physics or much of anything with the sudoku puzzle he claims is the "cutting edge research". Duh.

Randy does have one particular talent: He's able to parrot the claims of his mentor more articulately, though this does little to diminish the megalomaniacal inferences of such claims as "cure all disease" etc.

From Randy Powell's Facebook page:

An amazing video by my long time cohort in Vortex Based Mathematics Tom Barnett. This is the best animation I've seen that demonstrates the variation in the spiral patterns that I originally discovered are possible with these different toroid models. It also contains additional insights from Tom about how this all relates to the Phi ratio which is stunning.

www.youtube.com...

The YouTube Description:

Published on Feb 13, 2013

Music by Simon Mathewson
Hear more of his tunes here: simonmathewson.blogspot.co.uk...



This film presents recent research, insights, and ideas linking the divine ratio or Phi, and Vortex Based Mathematics.

It begins by showing how the Modular 9 VBM maps can be derived from the Fibonacci sequence. VBM maps in Mod 25, mod 49 and so on can also be found using the fibonacci sequence, and the lucas sequence. The data behind this information can be found here:

vortexspace.org...

The film then go's on to explain some of the established compelling number properties of the mod9 number maps.

Then the problems that have been identified concerning the proportions and configuration of the VBM tori are explained.

I then propose a possible solution to these problems that also encompasses the Phi ratio. This solution involves laying down one specific geometric rule: That each diamond on the surface of the torus have exactly the same surface area.

My finding of the phi ratio was purely accidental. I had been looking for any proportion which allowed for this rule. I tried many different ratios of inner to outer diameters before landing on phi.

I am an artist, not a trained mathematician, nor a programmer. There could well be some mistakes in my calculations. If so don't hesitate to let me know, and I will update the video.

There are definitely inaccuracies in the visuals depicted, as I have relied on drawings to define these new maps. I have calculated the 9x36 measurements slightly more precisely that the video. I will be attaching a cross section of this tori so that electronic engineers (perhaps those who have already created abha coils) might be able to manufacture a coil with these proportions.

The cross section will be on the following page
vortexspace.org...

If any electronic engineers or CG programmers would like to help continue the research here please get in touch.

The surface of the toroid should be hexagons, not diamonds. Once this is implemented, all of the answers will fall into place.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
"15 February 2013, Vortex Electricity, Daniel Nunez, Randy Powell, The Energy Evolution"

This must be the website by Randy's friend Chuck: Vortex Based Math work group

Originally posted by NeuronDivide
The surface of the toroid should be hexagons, not diamonds. Once this is implemented, all of the answers will fall into place.

What nonsense. For anyone who ever looked at sacred geometry, it's clear that it should be octagons, it's 9-1 and the fingerprint of God. Number nine resides in the center of the toroid and signifies the singularity.

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by LawrenceWippler

 

And this question?

In your video on Electrolysis, are you talking about the relative strength and positions of magnetic lines of force, albeit in different words?

Yes

reply to post by Mary Rose

Randy learned very soon that the shape of the Donut was the universal geometric design for maximum efficiency in energy transformation

He seems like a perfect spokesperson for Dunkin Donuts. He really needs to give them a call. Of course he would need to combat the foolish theories of Krispy Kreme physicists. That comes with the territory, you know?

Originally posted by DenyObfuscation

Originally posted by LawrenceWippler

Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by LawrenceWippler

 

In your video on Electrolysis, are you talking about the relative strength and positions of magnetic lines of force, albeit in different words?

(Also, I noted that you said that the North monopole is slightly stronger and that's why the Earth tilts on its axis.)

That is correct, it's also is responsible for the moon moving above and below the earth's equatorial plain.

I don't believe that's correct. Are you under the impression the Earth always tilts toward the Sun? Again this doesn't make sense.

The north pole of the earth is pushed away from the sun.

reply to post by LawrenceWippler


So, chemical reactions are caused by the attraction between magnetic monopoles.