It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by squandered
Science is definitely not your field if you don't let trifle things like REAL WORLD OBSERVATIONS get in the way of your pet "theories". Observations and testing are two very important things in the scientific method. If you just want to babble something about wavefunctions and things you don't really understand, trusting your intuition is the way to go. If you actually want to know what you're talking about actually studying physics goes a long way. Intuition is awfully wrong at many things, and quantum physics is just one of them.
I just don't understand this attitude that if someone's intuition tells them something, no amount of actual experimentation and rigorous explanation can move them.
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by squandered
You basically said you would forgo actually learning science to learn intuition, which is something not wise to do with quantum physics. I don't know why you think I "arrogantly" summed you up when you basically said so yourself. Perhaps you don't like that I have a strong opinion about quantum woo, but I do. Nothing personal against you, I'm just against BS in general.
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by squandered
Nothing personal against you, I'm just against BS in general.
Originally posted by squandered
If that's the way you think, you won't be surprised to to know I'll be concentrating hard on what resonates well with me and not putting much effort into learning the current theories and models or even begin to understand the maths.
If someone like me can understand and talk about cutting edge quantum / energy patterns and hint to it's application then I'd say science is in for an overhaul.
I have my own theories and I'm finding some symmetry in the ideas put forward, plus I see an enormous mount of hope in the ongoing science. I have more theories than you've had hot dinners.
It's rare that I'm able to apply them.
I've a decent 'idiots guide' to read
Originally posted by buddhasystem
. . . practice.
Originally posted by 547000
If you only took a college-level science course, you would know that's not how physics works.
Have we all given up on Rodin's theories having anything to do with reality?
Originally posted by squandered
Quantum healing is pet favourite of mine.
Originally posted by 547000
reply to post by Mary Rose
If you only took a college-level science course, you would know that's not how physics works. For instance, in most experiments you find a rational way to predict what will come from the experiment first, and repeat experiments multiple times until you come up with a theory that give real world results.
If being ignorant of science is what truth seekers do they don't really seek the truth but only ideas that "feels" right to them.edit on 17-2-2011 by 547000 because: (no reason given)
I think so. The only argument being given now is about philosophical assumptions. Basically, "no, it can't be applied to anything, tested in any way, predicts anything, but it's still somehow useful for learning about science". I think the main argument is "these scientists using obsolete models spoke of this so this is something important". Basically it's aether woo.
So, anyway, beebs, what about Rodin's number game corresponds to harnessing energy from a vacuum? Which part corresponds to which important idea that you read about that makes you think it's a UFT?