It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Disinfo hard at work.
The reason people don't believe a plane hit the pentagon
is because no one could have flown that flight path especially a guy who has NEVER flown a 757 in his life!
No simulator can train you for hijacking,killing people and crashing a plane!
And then you have all the witnesses that place the plane no where near the light poles.
Then you have the witnesses that lied.
Then you have the hole size.
Then you have the lack of bodies,luggage,seats,engines,wings normal things you would find at a plane crash.
Then there's the footage of the "plane" hitting the pentagon.Does it look like a plane in the footage to you?Please..
And how did the "plane" get so low to the ground and fly perfectly straight across like it shows in the footage?
Originally posted by GodIsPissed
And then you have all the witnesses that place the plane no where near the light poles.
Then you have the witnesses that lied.
Again I say nobody can be so stupid as to believe that a 747 hit the pentagon that day...
Originally posted by dillweed
reply to post by Remedylane
Say it, I don't mind. I stand by my suspicion that you are a plant. Again I say nobody can be so stupid as to believe that a 747 hit the pentagon that day, let alone say that these guys convinced you of it. Anyone with a brain can see that this group of people doesn't want the truth to come out. They want blind obedience, and if that won't work, confusion. You'd have us believe you are new to the discussion and based on 'the facts' as Wack calls them, you still stand in the middle? Really, you expect me to believe that?
"
Originally posted by GodIsPissed
Who said anything about missiles or holograms besides you?
You just had to bring that up eh?You brought that up just to try and make it like anyone who doesn't believe a plane hit the pentagon believes in those things.Good way to try and ruin people's credibility,that's what shills do.Can't prove people wrong so you try an dis-credit them lol WEAK.
Disinfo hard at work.
The reason people don't believe a plane hit the pentagon is because no one could have flown that flight path especially a guy who has NEVER flown a 757 in his life!No simulator can train you for hijacking,killing people and crashing a plane!
And then you have all the witnesses that place the plane no where near the light poles.
Then you have the witnesses that lied.
Then you have the hole size.
Then you have the lack of bodies,luggage,seats,engines,wings normal things you would find at a plane crash.
Then there's the footage of the "plane" hitting the pentagon.Does it look like a plane in the footage to you?Please..
And how did the "plane" get so low to the ground and fly perfectly straight across like it shows in the footage?
Originally posted by dubiousone
reply to post by Stillresearchn911
Thank you!
Do you have a link to a site where video and/or still photos of the aftermath can be viewed?
So, in any event, if the phantom jet wings only penetrated the concrete to a depth of a couple feet, should not the alleged jetliner wings have penetrated the Pentagon wall at least that far? Are a phantom jet's wings more massive or built of a material that would penetrate concrete deeper than the wings of a jetliner (not to mention the engines mounted on those wings)?
No member of our resident gang of would-be debunkers has been able to explain this anomaly.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by youngdrodeau
Dude,are you really trying to paint the picture that planes & all their massive parts are too fragile to withstand a crash without being atomized?Even though we can easily observe that that isn't the case by looking at every other plane crash.
Do you even KNOW what "atomized" means??? Doesn't seem so......
Why not look it up. And, no......aluminum isn't "atomized" just from an impact...even the incredibly high velocity impacts of 9/11. It breaks. Shatters. Shreds. Fragments. Just like most solids will.
LIQUIDS can "atomize"...which is actually a bit of misnomer.
Oh, and "every other plane crash"??
I see....you are an expert then, are you? On EVERY other airplane crash, and their circumstances? Do you also know what happens when there is a fire, post-crash? AND, you understand fully the differences that velocity, angle of impact and type of surface impacted changes the size, distribution and ultimate fate of the various components, as they cycle through the impact scenario????
Since you're an expert, then you're well aware of at least two other high-speed airliner impacts, for comparison?
PSA 1771
SwissAir 111
PSA, into the ground. Swiss Air, into the ocean. I actually to have a few pics of the Swiss Air MD-11 (LARGER than the Boeing 757) as its itty-bitty parts were being "re-assembled" as part of the accident investigation to determine cause of crash:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/3557513e34f9.jpg[/atsimg]
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/7cc2ea75d433.jpg[/atsimg]
The black framework is NOT part of the original airplane. It is there only as a means of holding all of the pieces in the proper locations, relative to each other.
I think a LOT of the so-called "9/11 truthers" here, and elsewhere, would do well to go out into the real world, and get some real world experience, before spouting off as if they "know" something...and showing utter ignorance at every turn.
edit on 19 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
Pentagon hole = approx 16 feet wide w/ blast scarring on either side .
The following annotated photos show exactly the locations of impact damage on the Pentagon E-ring facade. The outer limestone facade was breached between column lines 8 and 18, producing a hole spanning approximately 96 feet.
.... you show these detailed pictures of itty bitty pieces of aircraft, being re-assembled for the Swiss air MD-11. Good right? Answer all us Truthers this: Why weren't all the itty bitty bits of jet liners from all 4 9/11 jet evaporation sites, collected and kept for the same kind of re-assembly? Teacher, teach me. Help me, help you. You jump, I jump...