It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Hey Guys!
Its been a while since ive posted on here, some of you may remember me from the numerous threads I authored last year.... Anyways..
Originally posted by JustCurious1
reply to post by GeminiSky
Yes there has been an upsurge in sci-fi related programmes & films, that's because I would imagine the audience for sci-fi related productions has grown with their increasing audiences.
If there wasn't enough people willing to pay to watch these, they would dissipate.
(Demand and supply)
However saying that I CAN see why some people can think along the lines of we are being conditioned, but until I've seen solid proof of that I can't let myself believe it.
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Originally posted by JustCurious1
reply to post by GeminiSky
Yes there has been an upsurge in sci-fi related programmes & films, that's because I would imagine the audience for sci-fi related productions has grown with their increasing audiences.
If there wasn't enough people willing to pay to watch these, they would dissipate.
(Demand and supply)
However saying that I CAN see why some people can think along the lines of we are being conditioned, but until I've seen solid proof of that I can't let myself believe it.
Heres the thing tho.....we don't know the actual box office numbers....they may be overly inflated. I have read that directors like speilberg are paid off by the PTB to produce movies that fit their agenda.
OK so to put things in perspective for you guys, lets take into account ANY OTHER TYPE OF MOVIE....like say that movie "Houseguest" with sinbad? Good movie right? made good money i think...
OK so lets say almost every year after that movie was released, there were movie makers pitching the same exact movie, with a similar plot to studio execs..and the movies were approved. Sounds crazy right? Now lets say they started coming out with these "houseguest" scenario movies, SEVERAL times a year, again all sharing a similar plot....and the movies continue to be approved....sounds even crazier right?
Well guess what, ITS HAPPENING NOW, only the movies are about alien invasions, and all share the same plot, and continue to be released by the dozen every year.....
Does anyone see where im going with this??
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
The film Battle of LA takes place in modern times. A bunch of space ships fly over the city and have a fire fight with the military.
None of this happened in 1942
Originally posted by inthemass
Battle Of LA 1942
maybe they got the IDEA from this incident?
MORE
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
The film Battle of LA takes place in modern times. A bunch of space ships fly over the city and have a fire fight with the military.
None of this happened in 1942
Wait so in 1942, there was no UFO hovering for hours over LA while the military repeatedly fired their artillery guns upon it?
Wheew and I was worried, so I guess those were fake artillery shells, fake air raid sirens, and most importantly a fake UFO hovering for hours above a major US city? Thanks so much for clearing that up for us!edit on 13-1-2011 by GeminiSky because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GeminiSky
reply to post by something wicked
Really? So your saying the actual Battle of LA incident that happened in the 40's has absolutely nothing to do with anything ET?>
The fact that a silent, hovering craft appeared on the west coast of the united states,Was lit up by several spolights, IN PLAIN SIGHT, was bombarded for HOURS by anti aircraft guns, and other heavy artillery, and DID NOT BUDGE, then just simply vanished or flew away? Really?
Im sorry but I would think that the alien tech hypothesis fits in there, im not saying that it was ET for sure, but it was definitely extremely advanced tech, that seemingly did not belong to either the Axis OR Allies.
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
The film Battle of LA takes place in modern times. A bunch of space ships fly over the city and have a fire fight with the military.
None of this happened in 1942
Wait so in 1942, there was no UFO hovering for hours over LA while the military repeatedly fired their artillery guns upon it?
Wheew and I was worried, so I guess those were fake artillery shells, fake air raid sirens, and most importantly a fake UFO hovering for hours above a major US city? Thanks so much for clearing that up for us!edit on 13-1-2011 by GeminiSky because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Really? So your saying the actual Battle of LA incident that happened in the 40's has absolutely nothing to do with anything ET
Originally posted by GeminiSky
Originally posted by Unknown Soldier
The film Battle of LA takes place in modern times. A bunch of space ships fly over the city and have a fire fight with the military.
None of this happened in 1942
Wait so in 1942, there was no UFO hovering for hours over LA while the military repeatedly fired their artillery guns upon it?
Wheew and I was worried, so I guess those were fake artillery shells, fake air raid sirens, and most importantly a fake UFO hovering for hours above a major US city? Thanks so much for clearing that up for us!edit on 13-1-2011 by GeminiSky because: (no reason given)