UFO photo.

reply to post by tetsuo


thanks for going above and beyond on that very informative post Tetsuo. this entire thread is very educational on the subject of images/compression, i feel as though i have so much to learn still. a star for your great effort. i'll be sure to check out the link you posted as well. i'd like to get to the bottom of this and feel as though i may have jumped the gun on my conclusion, and if this proves to be the case i apologize to the OP.

NEW UPLOAD:
EXIF data of the three photos...side by side....

Does anyone notice anything...............strange?


EXIF side by side HERE

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Ya, wonder how that happened.

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Reading left to right
the times seem to be going backward

If the 1st pict is the 1st posted the pictures are going back in time

that?

edit nevermind was way off disregard

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Different font used on the copyright info .

Nope.....the font is by me...I quickly made it in Word and converted to a .pdf

Hint....found on the first page

Yall are smart....yall will see it

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Sep 29 2010 is the exif
the op stated picts took sep 23rd

Originally posted by kmarx
reply to post by youdidntseeme

 

i'd make the conclusion that the first link is a bad or rushed photo editing attempt. while the second link someone took more time to make a more convincing "product".

Or maybe one pic was of an unusual cloud formation and they decided to hoax the other two..

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
NEW UPLOAD:
EXIF data of the three photos...side by side....

Does anyone notice anything...............strange?

EXIF side by side HERE

All same brightness readings??
Odd

reply to post by greeneyedleo


The only discrepency I see is the 2 different dates the 23rd and the 29th.
It is possible that the dates got mixed up, I guess we will have to wait for the OP to answer that uestion as well.

Ok...so yall dont strangle me for making yall sit around and wonder

Look at the Date/Time Original for each photo.....

1:
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 46 minutes, 8 seconds ago

2.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago

3.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 20 hours, 29 minutes, 58 seconds ago

You see it now?

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
Ok...so yall dont strangle me for making yall sit around and wonder

Look at the Date/Time Original for each photo.....

1:
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 46 minutes, 8 seconds ago

2.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago

3.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 20 hours, 29 minutes, 58 seconds ago

You see it now?

A New Years joke ??

There's a ten hour gap between the photos if im reading that right .

Wow I totally missed that

I wasn't even close lol
:::feels like floyed now on dumb and dumber samsinite swanson :::

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Seems to work back to 29th Sep

Darn, missed that 10 hour gap......

Originally posted by bluemooone2
There's a ten hour gap between the photos if im reading that right .

DING DING DING DING!

Originally posted by greeneyedleo

Originally posted by bluemooone2
There's a ten hour gap between the photos if im reading that right .

DING DING DING DING!

OP said:

Q: How long did the UFO stay for?
A: About 40 minutes/ 1 hour until it floated behind the mountains out of view.

Originally posted by greeneyedleo
1:
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 46 minutes, 8 seconds ago

2.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 10 hours, 39 minutes, 29 seconds ago

3.
2010:09:29 00:00:00 3 months, 11 days, 20 hours, 29 minutes, 58 seconds ago

Now i see it once I bolded your quote for you

reply to post by greeneyedleo


Hmm, but usually 10 hours would put the shot into night time..

They altered the data then ???

reply to post by backinblack


6 day discrepency in the data from the claim
10 hour discrepency from 1 of the images

You could chalk up the first to somethin as simple as a typo or the wrong date encoded on the camera,
but the second, I dont see how 1 image can be created 10 hours later than the other two, when the event was supposed to be 40mins to an hour.