Close Encounter over the Nazca lines in Peru (video) HD 1080P filmd 1 jan 2011

Ive watched the video. Its HD ,but the still frames at the end are the most mind boggling



(google translate)
On January 1, 2011, a group of tourists made a flight over the Nazca lines in Peru. During their first flight in the early morning they had a brief encounter with an object that they currently own from the Cessna had not noticed. In the video are images of the famous mysterious Nazca lines. While the plane has to deal with any sudden turbulence and a looming cloud of flies, the cameraman continues filming while he was a very remarkable object that goes beyond just below their plane skims along. Once returned to his hotel room, the man looked back the images he had made from the plane and was shocked when he discovered what he had captured on film. He therefore decided to place the images on YouTube. As of 3:24 minutes into the movie to see and the object is then amplified and delayed play.

Would you mind and link a link?


Would very much like to see what it is.

**EDIT**
Sorry, I just read your thread, and there was no video. Then I post and your video is up! Gonna watch now!

reply to post by TribeOfManyColours


Do you have that utube link?? Thank you.

screen cap still frame

reply to post by TribeOfManyColours


Well it's certainly interesting ... there is definately something there ... just a shame that the video didn't continue or that anyone had a chance to interview the videoer.

Hope some of our in-house experts come forward on this one.

Thanks for sharing. Woody

Thanks for the video.

I must say it a new type of video!
But I don't really know what to say. First I thought, well it must be the pixels. But the still picture says something totally different.

I'll need to watch the video some more.

And for what the video says about the raining, that it is rare. I don't know anything about that, so I can't say if thats true or not.

Originally posted by ypperst
Thanks for the video.

I must say it a new type of video!
But I don't really know what to say. First I thought, well it must be the pixels. But the still picture says something totally different.

I'll need to watch the video some more.

And for what the video says about the raining, that it is rare. I don't know anything about that, so I can't say if thats true or not.


Thats what I thought, the only thing that makes it special are the still frames. But they are hot, still frames.

Seriously? This is evidence? C'mon people, I want irrefutable evidence just as much as the next guy but this is nothing. It's a damn blur.

Originally posted by RamsOnTop
Seriously? This is evidence? C'mon people, I want irrefutable evidence just as much as the next guy but this is nothing. It's a damn blur.

Haven't seen the still frame?. If this isn't photoshop then what could cause that shape?

The video is blur yes I agree

That video actually made me laugh. They think a hole in the clouds is a UFO.

They even "enhanced" the image which to me looks digitally altered from the original. If I tried to duplicate that with the original video, I would have to do some heavy modifications.

100% proof of what? That people need to learn to understand what they see with their eyes?

This to me seems like a half hoax half confusion event. I think whoever took the video knows it's not a UFO, but also knows that some people will have a hard time understanding what it is, and if they add some strange music for effect, and include the fact it's next to the Nazca lines, you can have a viral video instantly.

difrent types of UFO (for identification purposes)

Could be connected. shape looks the same.

Originally posted by gift0fpr0phecy
That video actually made me laugh.

They think a hole in the clouds is a UFO.

They even "enhanced" the image which to me looks digitally altered from the original. If I tried to duplicate that with the original video, I would have to do some heavy modifications.

100% proof of what? That people need to learn to understand what they see with their eyes?

This to me seems like a half hoax half confusion event. I think whoever took the video knows it's not a UFO, but also knows that some people will have a hard time understanding what it is, and if they add some strange music for effect, and include the fact it's next to the Nazca lines, you can have a viral video instantly.

Actually i think its a hoax to, the still picture is to well defined

I want concrete evidence as much as the next guy.

This doesn't appear to offer any unfortunately

All I saw was a break in the clouds and the still frames seemed mocked up in photoshop. I tried to replicate the still frame and got nothing like what was in the first shot.

To add to that the 'saucer' that is in the still frames looks like UFOs captured on camera from the 50s/60s - bad B-movie style ships.

I agree with Gift0fpr0phecy's comment of it being a break in the cloud That was what I thought when I first saw it, it's what I think now. Other than the random breaks in the cloud, we've no real way of seeing what immediately came into shot below the clouds, whether altitude was dropped or because of the cloud cover any type of distance range. For all we know it could be a distant hill/mountain puncturing the cloud cover. Either way the colour matches that of the terrain during previous cloud breaks.

Hate to say it but I don't think this is a UFO

What a let down. The video of the Nasca lines was amazing and I was expecting to see a craft of some sort. But all we get is a few frames of what just simply appears to be a break in the clouds. Its disc shaped, but its not clear enough to call it a solid object. Its just so brief that I don't think you can call this 100% proof of anything.

reply to post by TribeOfManyColours


I'm not saying I accept this as UFO footage...I just wanted to point out the hilarity of someone complaining that the imagery is TOO clear. What's the perfect level of fuzziness that ATS would accept for evidence of a UFO? =)

reply to post by ALadInsane


Yes, I think the fact that the color of the object matches the ground is strong evidence it might just be a hole in the clouds.

..and again, I think some digital manipulation was done on the "enhanced" stills. A few friends of mine agree.

Well that's 5:30 of my life I can't get back.. Get real this is not evidence..

I think I would have rather watched 5 minutes of blurry, blinking lights in a night sky.

Not nearly as revealing as the OP leads us all to believe.