It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by aoi3610
reply to post by adjensen
You seem stuck on this San-Andreas Fault.
That is not the point now is it.
No, the point is your credibility.
You claim that your predictions are based on math, science and historical research, and yet you've demonstrated that you don't seem to understand some pretty basic aspects of those, and you argue with those who do. What do you think that does to your credibility?
What maths did you use to determine that there would be an earthquake in California in three weeks?
How did those maths lead you to believe that it would either be California or Yellowstone?
What did you recalculate to determine that it was not Yellowstone?
What was the miscalculation that made you claim that tsunamis from a San Andreas earthquake would devastate India?
In your OP, you stated that ATS was "worthy" of hearing your claims.
One the reason that ATS stands above similar forums is that it is populated by a fair number of people who have active "BS" metres and aren't shy about calling others out on their fallacious claims.
You may attract a following, to be sure, but if you are shown to be wrong (as time will inevitably do on 25 January, 2011) it will end things pretty quickly.
Criticism from other members that is met with dismissal or foolish arguments merely speeds the process and helps to filter the dross from the quality on the site.
Just a question for you mate, and Mods/Admins, it has relevancy to the thread, because it comes back to aoi's credibility. You have told us that you are Degree Qualified in Physics and Mathematics, correct? (If I remember correctly, it was on one of the first 3 pages), yet you tell people that they are being pedantic about things. Well, as a Degree Qualified Mathematician and Physicist, surely you HAVE to be pedantic when doing degree's like these. Unless you only got passing marks, just enough to get your degree.
Ask any top quality Physicist and Mathematician, and they will tell you that in order for your work to be correct, you HAVE to be pedantic.
Was just wondering why the discrepancies?
(And I know there is a chance of spelling mistakes, but hey, was never good at English at School, I always prefered - nee- loved, Mathematics and Science.)
There is still no explanation of how these "predictions" were formed.
Despite my being retarded when it comes to mathematics, everything explained so far is still extremely vague regardless of whatever special math is involved.
There was nothing strikingly similar about stonehenge and the atomic structure of gold.
No?
The lines on the bottom of my frying pan could look similar.
Helpful, I'm sure they could.
If there's some advanced knowledge that the OP has, I think it would be nice to give thorough explanations, in layman's terms, for the people here who don't pretend to know sacred geometric, alchemical, quantum physics, magical, mathematical gobbledygoop.
What advanced knowledge have you read into this now?
You can research everything else you quoted with Google.
Sure the coral castle deal must have some special explanation, but God = Gold = Dog = Old, just doesn't work as an explanation as to how why and when California is dropping off into the ocean.
No it doesn't, and like I've said many times, that is not the point. GOLD is the point.
So could you please just s-p-e-l-l i-t o-u-t for us morons who would maybe like to try our hand at making a special something out with a beer can for some yet to be understood purpose?
GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLD
G O L D
You may find it easier to make gold from your method if you try using BROWNS GAS ,let us know if you create the gold the egyptians made quite easily
When I say by using BROWNS GAS ,i mean for fusing of the metals and refined to gold !
You are in probability correct about gold as a generator because you can`t easily manipulate diamonds and they are impossible to create manually as force required is cosmic !
Originally posted by TerribleTeam2
reply to post by aoi3610
Just a question for you mate, and Mods/Admins, it has relevancy to the thread, because it comes back to aoi's credibility. You have told us that you are Degree Qualified in Physics and Mathematics, correct? (If I remember correctly, it was on one of the first 3 pages), yet you tell people that they are being pedantic about things. Well, as a Degree Qualified Mathematician and Physicist, surely you HAVE to be pedantic when doing degree's like these. Unless you only got passing marks, just enough to get your degree.
Ask any top quality Physicist and Mathematician, and they will tell you that in order for your work to be correct, you HAVE to be pedantic.
Was just wondering why the discrepancies? (And I know there is a chance of spelling mistakes, but hey, was never good at English at School, I always prefered - nee- loved, Mathematics and Science.)
Originally posted by aoi3610
Eh, There are only 2 things I can think of that will knock the USA out of he world stage, San An & Yellowstone.
No calculation was made, and I do not think it will be Yellowstone, but who knows, this is based on that what I said above.
Criticism from other members that is met with dismissal or foolish arguments merely speeds the process and helps to filter the dross from the quality on the site.
Agreed, so stop being pedantic.
So, if you're just guessing about the process by which the United States would be knocked off the world stage, why wasn't your prediction that "the US will be knocked off the world stage by January 24"? Personally, I can think of a number of things that would accomplish this, and I certainly wouldn't say an earthquake in California would necessitate it.
But, moving beyond this, what is the basis that has led you to the very specific conclusion that the United States would be pushed out of the world scene within the next three weeks?
We are questioning your claims, not by nitpicking minutia
Someone who claims to have predictive powers
I respect your opinion
but here is my prophecy..
I see none of this happening.
So when I am correct at the end of January you can all right about me being this great prophet.
Originally posted by aoi3610
But, moving beyond this, what is the basis that has led you to the very specific conclusion that the United States would be pushed out of the world scene within the next three weeks?
It is written in the Bible. We are approaching/in the 7th SEAL now?
Have you read what it says?
Everything in the 6th Seal JUST happened?
Do you entertain the possibility of the Annunaki being the creators of humans? If so, what if any, were (are?) their connection with gold? I just find gold to be a constant important and noted element throughout history.
I always said "GOD" stood for Gold Oil Drug. The three commodities that the entire (modern) world depends on and the Elite can bank on!
Okay, but I don't seem to recall the great earthquake, the stars in the sky falling to Earth, the sky rolling up like a scroll, every mountain and island moving (or disappearing) and everyone on Earth going to hide in caves. I don't think that a solar and lunar eclipse in the past month merits your claim that everything in the Sixth Seal has happened, even for those who take John's Revelation literally.
So this is all a dispensationalist claim?
You're in good company, though everyone else seems to think that it is coming in May or October (or last October, November, December, etc.)