It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Klassified
reply to post by Yissachar1
I have learned to look at no claims as outlandish anymore. I just see them as unsubstantiated until I see further evidence of the possibilities. Well, except the blatantly obvious.
When there are things like "weather warfare treaty's", HAARP like complexes in several places in the world, and China being the latest to spend Billions on weather manipulation. You kinda start taking notice, though.
From my perspective, Technology in and of itself is usually not the problem. It is the men behind it that become a problem, and a hazard to the rest of us.
edit on 3-1-2011 by Klassified because: (no reason given)
The frequencies used by the HAARP facility are in the High Frequency (HF) portion of the spectrum. Electromagnetic radiation in the HF frequency range is non-ionizing - as opposed to the sun's ultraviolet and X-ray radiation whose photons have sufficient energy to be ionizing.
The intensity of the radiation from the completed HAARP facility at ionospheric heights will be too weak to produce artificial ionization through particle interactions. The power density produced by the completed facility will not exceed 3 to 4 microwatts per cm2, about two orders of magnitude below the level required for that process.
Originally posted by Yissachar1
Imo it is totally stupid to interfere with weather even at a local level.
To coin a metaphor; "one mans flood defense is another mans flood". Interfering with weather patterns in one place could destabalise another.
I think there should be a ban on them.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by Yissachar1
Wrong.
HAARP cannot create ions.
It can interact with ions, but not create ions, which is what those rain generators do.
The frequencies used by the HAARP facility are in the High Frequency (HF) portion of the spectrum. Electromagnetic radiation in the HF frequency range is non-ionizing - as opposed to the sun's ultraviolet and X-ray radiation whose photons have sufficient energy to be ionizing.
The intensity of the radiation from the completed HAARP facility at ionospheric heights will be too weak to produce artificial ionization through particle interactions. The power density produced by the completed facility will not exceed 3 to 4 microwatts per cm2, about two orders of magnitude below the level required for that process.
www.haarp.alaska.edu...
Originally posted by RedBird
Originally posted by Yissachar1
Imo it is totally stupid to interfere with weather even at a local level.
To coin a metaphor; "one mans flood defense is another mans flood". Interfering with weather patterns in one place could destabalise another.
I think there should be a ban on them.
I strongly disagree.
I believe that we can and should manipulate the weather in order to improve the human condition.
That we'll find a way and use it to hurt other people is perhaps inevitable, but we're all working on that too. In the meantime, it's good to feed people.
Originally posted by Dr UAE
while i am from UAE i have never heard of this before , so thanx for the info , but when i googled the name The Metro System i couldn't find a thing in regards of this report , but found out that the name is wrong, so the name is actually METEO SYSTEMS AG and the founder is Dr. Helmut Fluhrer , so i searched more and found out also that he has a patent here.
hmmm i think i should go and look for those antennas and take a photo of them , but where should i start.
anyway thanx for this info