It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
1)There's a difference between being part of the commission, and being fully under the hood of codex
3)In the end, I should have taken a look at your profile sooner, rather than carry out this argument with someone who has refused to research, who hasnt posted one single fact, and who **SHOCK AND HORROR** works in medicine(and not the herbal kind). Not really a surprise that someone who stands to benefit from it is all for it.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
1)There's a difference between being part of the commission, and being fully under the hood of codex
Please explain the difference, as it pertains to EU health, drug, and food laws, please. You seem very certain that there is a difference, so I'd like to hear what you think it is. Also, provide sources, as I have (and I mean actual sources, not blogs).
3)In the end, I should have taken a look at your profile sooner, rather than carry out this argument with someone who has refused to research, who hasnt posted one single fact, and who **SHOCK AND HORROR** works in medicine(and not the herbal kind). Not really a surprise that someone who stands to benefit from it is all for it.
So, you get mad that I whitewash people like yourself as paranoid sociopaths, and then turn around and do the same thing to my profession?
How does it feel to be a proven hypocrite?
Also, I have posted plenty of facts. I routinely provide research articles and studies in my threads and posts. Of course, once most people here see that there is a bit og logic and science involved in the discussion, they run away as fast as they can.
I suppose I can't be that mad, though. You can't reason someone out of a stance that they didn't reason themselves into in the first place.
edit on 1/1/2011 by VneZonyDostupa because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
1)The commission are the people who maintain and develop the guidlines. Codex Alimentarius is the guidlines themself. Do you really need a source for that?
www.codexalimentarius.net...
3)I did nothing to generalize about those in your profession. Just you. And I'm not wrong, am I? So I guess thats another lie you are caught in.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
1)The commission are the people who maintain and develop the guidlines. Codex Alimentarius is the guidlines themself. Do you really need a source for that?
www.codexalimentarius.net...
Why, exactly, would a nation (or gathering of nations like the EU) be part of a commission that is in charge or regulating something they are not a part of?
How do you NOT see how ridiculous what you just said sounds?
3)I did nothing to generalize about those in your profession. Just you. And I'm not wrong, am I? So I guess thats another lie you are caught in.
You are absolutely wrong. I work in public health and make the same salary if I write a thousand prescriptions of one prescription in a day. How DARE you accuse me of being a shill, and how DARE you suggest I make money from human suffering in any form? You are a despicable, divisive Alex Jones sheeple.
Go bleet and bah elsewhere. Your true colors are all too apparent here.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
And how do you even know where I live right now?
Dayton Ohio