found some evidence the globalists want to cut down the population...

sorry if this has been posted, but theres a very idiotic yet very informative website/press center called "The Globalist". i found a link to an older article they published in may of 2010 (this year).

here is a link to the article -

www.theglobalist.com...

i honestly could barely make it 3/4 of the way through... i can never handle the utter bull# that spews from their faces... it leaves a nasty residual feeling in my brain.

just wanted to know what you guys think? intersting these tards call "support of pro-creation" a ponzi scheme.

Here is a link to a list of incidents regarding population control www.bibliotecapleyades.net...

I do not know if you (anyone reading) is aware, but 'OVERPOPULATION' is the #1 threat to humanity, the earth and its RESOURCES.

It's simple guys... here I will try to explain VERY briefly (I realize the attention spans around here run around 10 seconds)

Here you have the earth (follow?), tonnes of people (billions) and more coming, FINITE resources (that means, an amount that is not replenishable) FINITE jobs as JOBS are dependent on RESOURCES.

LIFE is dependent on RESOURCES. JOBS are dependent on RESOURCES. PEOPLE are dependent on both JOBS and RESOURCES which are .... what? ... anybody...? yes


FINITE!

We are already at 6.8 Billion people in the world by 2050 it will be 9.3 Billion. In 1959 the world population was 2.5 Billion. That's a large growth factor. source

Do you think the earth can sustain that amount of people? Do you think we will start having another world war to cut down the population?

reply to post by MavRck


and may i ask, what resources are non-renewable? sure we might run out of immediate resources, in which case majority will die or kill themselves off, BUT some will remain to repopulate and start over. this is called NATURAL SELECTION or survival of the fittest. and i just so happen to see myself as the fittest...

Originally posted by Subhuti
We are already at 6.8 Billion people in the world by 2050 it will be 9.3 Billion. In 1959 the world population was 2.5 Billion. That's a large growth factor. source

Do you think the earth can sustain that amount of people? Do you think we will start having another world war to cut down the population?

i think it will be a lot worse than a world war, try thinking global genocide... war is fighting between two armed masses. in this case the majority WILL NOT be armed well enough to defend themselves. after a lot are dead natural selection will weed out the rest. and i NEVER said overpopulation was not a problem.

I detest the globalist NWO elite, but I have to agree that YES, the world is WAY OVERPOPULATED. That being said, however, does not give anyone the right to play God and impose genocide or violate people's rights by sneaking sterilants into drinking water, or any other population-reducing schemes perpetrated by people who think they're the only ones who have a right to be here.

Let God decide when, if and how the culling-of-the-herd is to occur. Mass extinctions have occurred multiple times throughout history, and it's only a matter of time until it happens again.

We can not let the globalists decide this for us!

Originally posted by Rockerchic4God
We can not let the globalists decide this for us!

ummm, a lil too late

www.wnd.com...

it's already been decided

just who and when remains to be seen.

reply to post by WJjeeper


Your not supposed to get it. Your sane. Its ok these murdering globalists have lost touch with reality.

Latex things called condoms ? i blame the increase in births in the UK due to soft benefit being handed out. A couple get together, no job, wants a baby, cant afford it but then rake in the benefits hopefully ill be long gone before we have another world war.. im not holding my breath though

The Georgia guidestones

www.associatedcontent.com...

The ten principles are:
- Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
- Guide reproduction wisely - improving fitness and diversity.
- Unite humanity with a living new language.
- Rule passion - faith - tradition - and all things with tempered reason.
- Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
- Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a one world court.
- Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
- Balance personal rights with social duties.
- Prize truth - beauty - love - seeking harmony with the infinite.
- Be not a cancer on the earth - Leave room for nature - Leave room for nature.

There you go, ½ billion (Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature) so 5½ billion must go!

Reply to post by MavRck

First of all, overpopulation…because there are soooo many people living in Central Africa, Central Mexico, the Australian outback, hell, the Midwest of the USA. Am I right?

Second, if it is such a problem, why are you still here? Save the planet, man!




Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

reply to post by canadiansenior70


If you listen to guidestones you must have rocks in your head. How can we kill off 5 1/2 billion people while still balancing personal rights with social duties? Yeah it has some nice ideas, but it is just one idea in a few billion floating around.

reply to post by canadiansenior70


I agree with the guidestones. Just because we can have a large population, should we? Look at human society as a whole... we are way messed up.

So the question is, how do we 'remove' 5.5 billion people? Unless you can convince people that procreating is a bad thing then there is no easy answer. Since I am not religious and I do not believe everyone is a special snowflake the answer for me is uncomfortable but understandable. Create a death rate greater than a birth rate.

Honestly, how many individuals contribute to the greater good of mankind? Oh, we have people in communities who do good deeds, but how do they help advance us as a species? Even with fewer people, there will still be those who do good deeds. With a smaller population I believe greater advancements could be accomplished.

The fatal flaw with this view is that the human population would still be human. Greed and desire for power would still hold sway. Can we ever truly escape what we are? At least with fewer humans, nature would be better off.

Step outside of your humanity and ask yourself this question: While no one wants to die, does everyone really have a right to live?

Originally posted by rndinslc
reply to post by canadiansenior70

 

I agree with the guidestones. Just because we can have a large population, should we? Look at human society as a whole... we are way messed up.

How so?

. . .

Honestly, how many individuals contribute to the greater good of mankind?

Oh, we have people in communities who do good deeds, but how do they help advance us as a species? Even with fewer people, there will still be those who do good deeds. With a smaller population I believe greater advancements could be accomplished.

How do you judge such a thing?

Who has the most wealth? The most knowledge? The most power?

What of the people who inspire others to do things, especially unintentionally? WHat of the people who start slow, but by the golden years, they have contributed much?

What of the ones who contributed nothing, but their child or grand child, or great grand child becomes another Einstein, or Galileo, or Newton?

Until you become omnipotent, you, or anyone else, have no right or basis to judge one's contributions to mankind.

. . .

Step outside of your humanity and ask yourself this question: While no one wants to die, does everyone really have a right to live?

As I have said before, even in this very thread. You think that we are over-populated, have at it. Bite the bullet. Save humanity! Practice what you preach . . . or are you full of unadulterated bull crap?

Funny how every single one o you over-population promoting whackos wants to kill everyone off to save the planet, or save mankind, but you are unwilling to take a taste of your own medicine.

There's no need for depopulation.
All it takes is for people to have no more children that what it takes to replace themselves = 2 for a couple.
If your a single parent, then 1.
Usually financial circumstances and common sense limit how many children people have anyway, without any help from wrinkly old farts who call themselves "Elite" .

Originally posted by Lemon.Fresh

Originally posted by rndinslc
reply to post by canadiansenior70

 

I agree with the guidestones. Just because we can have a large population, should we? Look at human society as a whole... we are way messed up.

How so?

. . .


Honestly, how many individuals contribute to the greater good of mankind?

Oh, we have people in communities who do good deeds, but how do they help advance us as a species? Even with fewer people, there will still be those who do good deeds. With a smaller population I believe greater advancements could be accomplished.

How do you judge such a thing?

Who has the most wealth? The most knowledge? The most power?

What of the people who inspire others to do things, especially unintentionally? WHat of the people who start slow, but by the golden years, they have contributed much?

What of the ones who contributed nothing, but their child or grand child, or great grand child becomes another Einstein, or Galileo, or Newton?

Until you become omnipotent, you, or anyone else, have no right or basis to judge one's contributions to mankind.

. . .

Step outside of your humanity and ask yourself this question: While no one wants to die, does everyone really have a right to live?

As I have said before, even in this very thread. You think that we are over-populated, have at it. Bite the bullet. Save humanity! Practice what you preach . . . or are you full of unadulterated bull crap?

Funny how every single one o you over-population promoting whackos wants to kill everyone off to save the planet, or save mankind, but you are unwilling to take a taste of your own medicine.

EVERYTHING this guy said X2...

reply to post by rndinslc

While no one wants to die, does everyone really have a right to live?

Everyone has a duty to live, we would not be here otherwise. If you think the answer to the worlds problems is to 'kill em all and let god sort it out' then you are not thinking hard enough. With a population of 6 billion the capabilities are more than what can fit inside one head. This is an amazing resource that should be utilized, not burnt in ignorance.

Some of you people are very sad. You believe that overpopulation is a problem!? Well just like the other poster on here said then, save the planet and go ahead and start by offing yourself! That is the dumbest bunch of BS I've ever heard. There is still plenty of room for human beings.

And here's another thought: have some faith and repsect for your own species! How about we stop with the ridiculous and pointless squabbles over money and power and start finding new ways to live in harmony? Or how about we find new ways to colonize new places? Be it on Earth or even spread out?

You people that think that overpopulation is a problem are wonderfully brainwashed or at the very least incapable of thinking big. But hey if you want to get started saving the Earth right now instead of putting in the effort to improve society for everyone then by all means do us a favor and kill yourself!

Exactly what I think wookie. i wonder if half of these people have been to a REAL forest that is pretty much untouched by man. i live in area with THOUSANDS of square miles of perfectly beautiful, foliated, hydrated land. there is so much room for expansion, both physically and mentally.