It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by Silverado292
Can you still own Bows and arrows or crossbows? If you can that and Camouflage should get you some nice toys should the poo smack into the fan.
Don't think so. a year or so ago, there were threads on ATS about how the UK government was considering regulating spoons as dangerous weapons. Quite sure that would mean no bows and arrows for you!
New question for the thread. How many years before the UK government attempts to ban sticks and rocks?
That would take all you law abiding Brits back to pre-stone age in terms of being able to defend yourselves. Except for all the criminals that is ...
edit on 12/27/2010 by centurion1211 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by paraphi
It was only a matter of time before someone said that Switzerland bucks the trend and is an example of a nation where firearms are rife and murder rates are low. In fact, on a per capita basis Switzerland suffers a higher rate of gun related murder than the UK. Various credible sources are commonly referred to, but Wikipedia gun violence encapsulates the statistics, although (as with all statistics) there is conflict – including between different pages of Wikipedia.
Regards
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Nothing beats the stopping power of a gun, of course, but with the right techniques and stealth, one can beat even thousands armed men, the more the merrier. For example:-
1. Single armed man.
Give him what he wants slowly, while faking distress, move in close, elbow his throat or solar plexus. It will stun him and it is those precious seconds that you will need to disarm him or get away. Scientifically, a human needs 3 seconds to aim, anything less than that and that bullet will miss. 3 seconds is all you need to save your life.
edit on 24-12-2010 by SeekerofTruth101 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by davespanners
reply to post by paraphi
I'm afraid that just isn't true.
Have a look at Switzerland
In some 2001 statistics, it is noted that there are about 420,000 assault rifles stored at private homes, mostly SIG SG 550 types. Additionally, there are some 320,000 assault rifles and military pistols exempted from military service in private possession, all selective-fire weapons having been converted to semi-automatic operation only. In addition, there are several hundred thousand other semi-automatic small arms classified as carbines. The total number of firearms in private homes is estimated minimally at 1.2 million to 3 million.[8]
link
Yet it comes 12 places below the united kingdom in the rate of murders.
link
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Nothing beats the stopping power of a gun, of course, but with the right techniques and stealth, one can beat even thousands armed men, the more the merrier. For example:-
1. Single armed man.
Give him what he wants slowly, while faking distress, move in close, elbow his throat or solar plexus. It will stun him and it is those precious seconds that you will need to disarm him or get away. Scientifically, a human needs 3 seconds to aim, anything less than that and that bullet will miss. 3 seconds is all you need to save your life.
2.Armed Team.
Distract them and make your getaway into enclosed places. Within enclosed places, they will be limited to one person at a time to attack you, lowering the odds in your favour. Delay them as long as possible, take over their uniforms and mingle with them, and within that confusion you make your getaway.
3. Suicide Bomber
No amount of bullets fired upon him is gonna stop him from pressing the switch. It's the fallout from the bomb that you need to stop.
Never run away from a suicide bomber. Rather, close up the distance quickly and pin him to the ground. Your body and his will absorb the fallout or sharpnels from flying out in mult-directions harming others. A typical suicide bomber carries no powerful nuke.
It will be a damping effect and at worse, the damage done is a hole in the ground and glass panels fall from the blast waves... and your life. We humans will have to die one day anyway, sooner or later. We came into this world with nothing and will leave with nothing. But your selfless act will be remembered, and others whom care will in turn return that favour to those you cared about and whom loved you.
These are only some of the more well knowned techniques that one can learn from the army, literature or the media freely.
Originally posted by ayoss
Converting a air rifle to fire "real" ammo sounds really dangerous. When you're dealing with traditional ammo, you're dealing with extremely high amounts of energy. I'm not sure if I'd trust a air rifle of any type to deal with the 30,000+ psi forces that you'd encounter after converting it. Even if it fires a few times fine I imagine it can form hairline cracks that you can't see and it may eventually end up blowing up in your face.
I'm a big fan of the AR15 platform so if I were to go with something legal in the UK, it would be the TAC 15, a "tactical assault crossbow"...
O A typical suicide bomber carries no powerful nuke.
Originally posted by woogleuk
Originally posted by davespanners
reply to post by Silverado292
It's not that hard to get a shotgun license at all, you just have to prove that you use it to go clay pigeon shooting or such.
You can get crossbows yes.edit on 24-12-2010 by davespanners because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by StevenDye
Well....make guns legal and I see ALOT of people dead in this country within the first few days. Maybe it's because we have so much scum living here, or maybe it's because we have been without guns for so long people simply wouldn't use them responsibly.
But I can guarentee the chavs and their like around where I live (Not a bad area) would happily pull a gun in the pettiest of arguments if they could legally carry it aorund anyway.
And in a SHTF situation...you don't need guns in this country. Everything is so compact, unless you wish to wander into the street which would be certain death, close quarters melee weapons are going to be your best bet anyway.
Originally posted by woogleuk
I've sat and thought about this quite a lot tonight. As most of you are aware I am against guns, and I have never quite knew why, nothing to do with the cumbrian gunman, as my feelings are from before that.
Give an Englishman a gun, and a lot of people are going to die.
Give me a gun, and despite how much I am against them, a lot of [nasty] people will die.
That could be because we have lived in gun isolation so long, or it could be because of wo we are.
When we fight, we fight, and fighting with guns isn't fighting. It is the easy way out.
Now I always believed that the reason I was so opposed to guns was becsause I don't believe anyone should die / be killed / murdered, and that is still the main reason behind my opinions. But given the drive, the passion, the heart of your typical Brit, could we be trusted to be armed? I don't think so.....so ends my drunken ramblings...............edit on 31/1/11 by woogleuk because: (no reason given)