It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by mayabong
Dont forget Phil Zelikow (head of 911 commission) and dozens of other israel agents in our government.
Should I ask my next door neighbor? Her son-in-law was one of the counsels to 911 Commission
His is not a Jew for all the anti semitic Jew Haters here...
Also it was personal for him - two of his brothers-in-law died at WTC, both worked at Cantor Fitzgerald
What the hell is the council to the 911 commission?
I don't care what you say, these people are Israel firsters.
Originally posted by Otamad
His head is clearly up way in his ass and if he wants to stay there, he can.
This is exactly why we need an investigation, my friend
Originally posted by dalan.
reply to post by GenRadek
Dude, the point of the video is the fact that Lieberman denies that WTC 7 fell. What the point of the Commission Report is is irrelevant to the thread.
Originally posted by randomname
has he even been voted in office. i have yet to hear or even see anyone acknowledge that they voted for him.
does anybody even run against him. someone should investigate the election procedure in his state.
i suspect massive fraud and rigging, i bet they set it up so the only opponents running against him are so unpopular and unheard of that only their mothers know who they are.
i don't even think his opponents campaign, i think they are paid to lend their name so atleast the masquerade of democracy is preserved.
this guy is a puppet of the highest order, no normal citizen in their right mind would vote for this weasel snake of a human being.
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by hooper
No he said it just didn't happen. lol. Have you ever made a thread on this board, I see you have over 2000 posts but not one flag. lol
Do you just troll 911 threads on the internet all day?edit on 18-12-2010 by mayabong because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ericsnow
Skip to 1:00
Also says he does not support a new investigation. Of course this is only because he truly believes the first investigation was accurate. He wouldn't lie to us
Sandy Grazioso of West Paterson, a convert to Catholicism, said she wanted to meet the pope at Ground Zero. She lost two sons -- Timothy and John -- in the attack and has been active in a number of family groups. Her son-in-law, John Azzarello, was senior counsel to the 9/11 commission.
So Azzarello covered up the death of his 2 brothers-in-law?
Originally posted by roboe
Let's do a play-by-play of the video.
1. CT'er ask Lieberman about building 7. Since it was left out of the official investigation, "would you support an official investigation?"
2. Lieberman goes "Every now and then I meet somebody like a Phil somebody about this building seven, but I have no evidence that this really occured." He's talking about the CT .
Editor cuts in with video of it actually collapsing, suggesting Lieberman is what, an idiot who just said he didn't believe it collapsed?
3. Questioner said it wasn't a conspiracy, the building did actually fall, would you support an official investigation?
4. "Based on what I know now, no, I would not."
5. "Thank you."