It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Rather than uncovering the truth, are both Ahmadschinedad and the people who defend the OS not interested in the truth at all, but more interested in shaping the version of the truth that sits best with them?
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by Cassius666
Rather than uncovering the truth, are both Ahmadschinedad and the people who defend the OS not interested in the truth at all, but more interested in shaping the version of the truth that sits best with them?
Ahmadschinedad ?
It's okay that you can't spell his name but , what is not okay is that you forgot that he is a TRUTHER , according to you guys . Remember ?
As another member points out to you guys , WE know your silly conspiracy theories better than you yourselves do .
Also , please enlighten me as to what the point of this thread is ? Did you bring something new and worthwhile to the table and I simply missed it ? Or , is this just another one-liner to take a stab at those who don't share your beliefs ?
You guys remind me of vultures, perched in front of your screens waiting for another 'victim'. You trip over one another attacking everyone who doubts the bullsh#t that spews from your keyboards. If you guys are so smart what in the world are you doing here? By now you've certainly realised that people are hip to your game, yet you continue personally attacking everyone with petty insults about spelling and grammar ...
Originally posted by Cassius666
The US Taxpayer payed for the NIST report to be composed and the goverment stands behind its findings.
both Ahmad and the believers are not interested in the truth, but the version of the truth that suits them best,
In one case he sides with the scientific majority
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by Cassius666
both Ahmad and the believers are not interested in the truth, but the version of the truth that suits them best,
But , "Ahmad" is on YOUR side of the 9/11 debate . Why do you slam a fellow truther in this manner ?
" ...the version of the truth that suits them best, ..." And this is why the TM has so many "versions" of the truth , because you guys can't even agree with your fellow truthers .
Ahmad picked his side according to what sits best to it, not because of the evidence presented,
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by kwakakev
Thats the parallel I am making, both Ahmad and the believers are not interested in the truth, but the version of the truth that suits them best, for whatever reason.
Originally posted by Cassius666
reply to post by No Retreat No Surrender
Ahamad says there was no Holocaust. Thats a difference. It is true that historians argue about the approximate number, but does it matter wether 1 million or 6 million died? How many need to die till it is "bad"?
Originally posted by okbmd
reply to post by Cassius666
Ahmad picked his side according to what sits best to it, not because of the evidence presented,
My point exactly . Standard-operating-procedure for truthers .