It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by Seventytwo
Could you give me a detailed outline as to how exactly you came up with those equations?
I don't believe Da Vinci was much more then a flamboyant artist, so if you have information saying otherwise, I'd love
to read it.
Originally posted by T3hEn1337ened
reply to post by tauristercus
Please don't come on here claiming to be an authority on images and image enhancement software when you're clearly not. It will only serve to convolute this thread with ignorant, uninformed arguments over whether current online images are clear enough to show symbols in the Mona Lisa's eyes.
Your starting image is blurry. Anything you do to it, aside from replacing it with a better image, can't change that fact. If you don't believe me, please view the following image:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/56c0a7c4ec23.jpg[/atsimg]
I will not debate this with you; this image is clearer than yours. Though I doubt that these supposed letters and numbers would be visible even in this image, I invite everyone to take a close look at the eye on the right side of the image. To the left of the pupil you can clearly see what appears to be a capital "R" or "B" followed by a capital "F" or "E".
I AM NOT claiming these are the hidden letters necessarily, but what I AM trying to prove is that with a sharper image in higher resolution, we may indeed discover that there are tiny little details that aren't visible in lower quality images.
The defense rests.