It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
Manning was a patsy much like " Oswald " of the 60's.
Manning told Lamo that he enlisted in the Army in 2007 and held a Top Secret/SCI clearance, details confirmed by his friends and family members. He claimed to have been rummaging through classified military and government networks for more than a year and said that the networks contained “incredible things, awful things … that belonged in the public domain, and not on some server stored in a dark room in Washington DC.”
Originally posted by schuyler
Computers, for example, have their USB ports deactivated and thumb drives are not allowed on the premisis. CD-R/W devices are deacivated. Yet this guy, Bradley Manning, supposedly smuggled out all these files on a CD labeled "Lady Gaga." Manning had access to SIPRNET. To give you an idea of requirements, see this link. One of the things the link talks about is that your use of SIPRNET is monitored.
The biggest thing that strikes me here is that the security had to have been very lax for this to have happened. He should not have been able, physically, to copy the files. Security rules were violated by people other than Manning here. The second biggest thing that strikes me is that he maintained a Secret security clearance at all. He had gotten into serious trouble at least twice including once that busted him an entire grade, which is serious, usually career-ending punishment. Normally if you have any kind of judicial action against you in the military, you lose your clearance, even if it is "just" a Secret clearance. I've seen officers lose their careers over a small security-related mistake yet Manning was allowed to stay in place. Unbelievable!
Originally posted by Elieser
Do you have to be a certain rank in order to have a certain security clearance?
I have been wondering about this myself since I heard what rank he was.
Originally posted by Elieser
Do you have to be a certain rank in order to have a certain security clearance?
I have been wondering about this myself since I heard what rank he was.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by HomeBrew
Maybe some, but the information is all over the place relating to multiple subjects. Last I remember we do not put all our eggs in one basket....one big basket.
If the leaks were focused, I could see this as plausible. The low level information of 'damning' information all placed into a neat little file or folder on the SIPRnet? Really?
IF that be the case then the real threat is a piss poor security system that has gone off the cliff since I last had knowledge of it.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by HomeBrew
Maybe some, but the information is all over the place relating to multiple subjects. Last I remember we do not put all our eggs in one basket....one big basket.
If the leaks were focused, I could see this as plausible. The low level information of 'damning' information all placed into a neat little file or folder on the SIPRnet? Really?
IF that be the case then the real threat is a piss poor security system that has gone off the cliff since I last had knowledge of it.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by HomeBrew
Keep in mind though, and E-3 servicemen, isn't really gonna be up on the food chain, which would further suggest, his lack of actual " hands on " applications to the sensitive type's of material.
Originally posted by Whereweheaded
reply to post by HomeBrew
Keep in mind though, and E-3 servicemen, isn't really gonna be up on the food chain, which would further suggest, his lack of actual " hands on " applications to the sensitive type's of material.