Pentagon Insider: AIPAC Ordered Bush to Attack Iran

Pentagon Insider: AIPAC Ordered Bush to Attack Iran

www.veteranstoday.com

“The Iraq invasion was a ‘done deal’ in 1999, but not as you thought to steal oil and bilk billions, that was all gravy. Iraq, the entire Bush presidency, had one purpose, to remove Iran from the picture.”

(visit the link for the full news article)

More snippets from the article:

“9/11 was planned as early as 1999 or before, to be executed as soon as the Bush team was in place. One meeting in April 2001, a meeting outlining the invasion of Iraq, may have been the green light.’ Chalibi was in place early on, from day number one. I remember telling them he was a known crook, totally disreputable and that things in Iraq would fall apart immediately. Nobody in the National Security Council ever spoke about what they would do once Saddam was overthrown. Nobody really seemed to care."
-----------------

“This is where so many have it wrong. In fact, there was never serous discussion about terrorism or Al Qaeda or bin Laden. These things weren’t even a sideshow. The only talk about any of it was how it could be used to justify going into Iraq and then attacking Iran."
-----------------

Q. The intel on Iraq, we all know it was wrong. When was that learned?

A. “The administration didn’t believe false intelligence, it created it, order it in place before the election to be ready for, well I guess, 9/11. Silencing Plame and Joe Wilson, those were the same people who planned the creation of the phony intelligence. There was never a discussion of a serious terrorist threat against the United States. These guys would have fallen off their chairs laughing themselves to death. It was all a joke to them, 9/11, the Iraq invasion, all of it.”
----------------

“All of it, all foreign policy issues, were out of AIPAC, they ran everything in the Bush adminsitration. That was the whole point of it. We never were told why we had to destroy Iran only that it had to be done. Nobody ever asked why. Nobody ever believed Iran had a credible nuclear program and, eventually, we were all very certain they never would. There was never an issue about Iran being a threat or not. There was never an issue of motive of any kind. These were orders, plain and simple, the administration that will come into office in 2001 will be tasked with destroying Iran, tasked by AIPAC who will control all key position in the administration.”
----------------


==================================

I haven't been able to confirm whether this is true...but thought I would post it because of the significance of what is being said.

If it is true, it looks as though Obama has not yet deliverd for AIPAC, which is interesting given the vociferous criticism of him for not being supportive enough of Israel.

Apparently there is more detailed information to come.


www.veteranstoday.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

I think many of us already figured as much. It would seem that AIPAC is the true owners of government, along with the many other pro-Israeli lobbies. Basically, the American people are being held hostage and used as a tool for Israeli interests.

I don't think it's too much of a secret that our "elected" officials are beholden to AIPAC, instead of their constituents or the people who elected them in.

Anyway, good find (unfortunately).

--airspoon

Originally posted by airspoon
I think many of us already figured as much. It would seem that AIPAC is the true owners of government, along with the many other pro-Israeli lobbies. Basically, the American people are being held hostage and used as a tool for Israeli interests.

I don't think it's too much of a secret that our "elected" officials are beholden to AIPAC, instead of their constituents or the people who elected them in.

Anyway, good find (unfortunately).

--airspoon

I agree with you, its pretty obvious. So what can we do about this as Americans. Any ideas? This is serious stuff. I'm not sure voting works. (I'll probably vote for ron paul though if that helps)

This entire thing seems confused. Are we talking Iran or Iraq here? It keeps saying Iran over and over, but the context appears to be Iraq. I know they're close, but still, being different countries and all one would think a credible source would get it straight.

reply to post by schuyler


They are talking about Iran, though referencing Iraq and mentioning how Iraq was being used in the effort to get at Iran. For instance, they were blaming Iran for the insurgent problem in Iraq, when the real threat was from the Sunni, who were in turn getting their finding and weapons from Saudi Arabia, Bush's business partners. So, while Bush's friends were arming the insurents that were the biggest threat to US soldeirs and regional stability, the blame was being shifted towards Iran.

That is just one instance though and the article is only referencing Iraq. However, it appears as if Iran was scheduled to be invaded in 2006, according to this whistle blower. If you time it just right and do a little research, you could clearly see that 2006 is when the Bush Admin was really piling out the anti-Iranian rhetoric and seemingly pushing for war.

Also, the link in my signature below, to the thread entitled, "Target Iran: The real reason behind the bullseye pegged on Iran", shows that the Iranian Oil Bourse was right on schedule to open and compete with the USD (dollar).


--airspoon

Is this website you are linking to reliable for solid information and not sensationalized media?

I am not doubting it one bit actually, it is all obviously a sham of some sort, but just curious.