It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by mayabong
Thats because they did not reach the impact zones (93-98 in North Tower, 78-83 in South Tower)
This is where the aircraft struck the building and spilled jet fuel started the fires
You are not going to play "Only 2 pockets of fire " crap are you.....?
FDNY was only beginning to reach the lowest area of impact zone on 78th floor of South Tower Chief Orio
Palmer had gone ahead and radioed what he found. 78 floor was sky lobby where people changed elevators
not a lot to burn as floor was mostly tile/marble and machinery. Only few offices with combustibles
Chief Palmer (who knew the towers well) had found freight elevator which ran to 41st floor cutting distance to climb in half. Palmer was a marathon runner and being a chief officer was not carrying hose or heavy tools to impede him.
Fire Marshal Ron Bucca also made it up the stairs to the 78th floor.
If listen close to radio will hear that most of crew was still in stairway when building collapsed
Originally posted by Smack
reply to post by Alfie1
I am not a US citizen citizen and I would not claim that the US has never put a foot wrong or backed the wrong despot but to paint everything as black as you do is simply absurd and perverse.
Then you are arguing from a position of complete ignorance.
What is the greater absurdity; that the US has 700 military bases in over 130 nations, or that I object to my government occupying foreign nations and slaughtering people in my name?
Which is the greater perversity; that my government openly admits to torture, imprisonment without trial, assassination of anyone the President deems a threat, and the pretense of supporting democracy while supporting murderous undemocratic regimes, or that I want accountability, justice, and peace?
As to the rest - a point by point refutation of the stale, 4th grade historical fallacies you cite, would take up too much of my time.
It is now apparent that you are a US citizen so I think that it is very sad that you feel as you do.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Laugh away as you see fit, as I don't care whether you laugh at me or not. All I care about is if you can show why even an iota of anything I'm posting here is false. Can you?
The fires in WTC 7 were ignited as a result of the impact of debris from the collapse of WTC 1, which was approximately 110 m (350 ft) to the south. The debris also caused structural damage to the southwest exterior of the WTC, primarily between floors 7 to 17.
Factors contributing to the building failure were: thermal expansion occurring at temperatures hundreds of degrees below those typically considered in design practice for establishing structural fire resistance ratings; significant magnification of thermal expansion effects due to the long-span floors, which are common in office buildings in widespread use; connections that were designed to resist gravity loads, but not thermally induced lateral loads; and a structural system that was not designed to prevent fire-induced progressive collapse.
NIST NCSTAR 1A at 45 states: [November 2008]
The slope of the velocity curve is approximately constant between about 1.75 s and 4.0 s, and a good straight line fit to the points in this range (open-circles in Figure 3-15) allowed estimation of a constant downward acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 32.2 ft/s2 (9 .81 m/s2 ), equivalent to the acceleration of gravity g. Acceleration equivalent to the acceleration of gravity defines free fall.
NCSTAR 1-9 at 607 observes: [November 2008]
a freefall descent over approximately eight stories at gravitational acceleration for approximately 2.25 s
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"It's easy to dismiss someone's theory or idea of what may have occurred considering they're not the ones with access to relevant data or any significant physical evidence that is likely available to federal agencies."
And there lies the problem. The physical evidence at Ground Zero was quickly disposed of by those authorized to do the clean up. If a real investigation had been done, the evidence should not have NOT tampered with and should have remained on the site until each and every bit of it was examined, logged and documented. This would have taken weeks, if not months.
Instead, the dump trucks were rolled in immediately and the area was swept clean because Osama Been Hidin' had been found guilty in a lightning quick fashion and with absolutely no evidence. Again, why the rush to hustle the evidence out of there, which completely compromised the non-investigation?
And by the way, spoliation of evidence is a felony under New York State law. It is usually something which is done by the perpetrator or an accomplice for the obvious reason of avoiding prosecution.
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by SphinxMontreal
"It's easy to dismiss someone's theory or idea of what may have occurred considering they're not the ones with access to relevant data or any significant physical evidence that is likely available to federal agencies."
And there lies the problem. The physical evidence at Ground Zero was quickly disposed of by those authorized to do the clean up. If a real investigation had been done, the evidence should not have NOT tampered with and should have remained on the site until each and every bit of it was examined, logged and documented. This would have taken weeks, if not months.
Instead, the dump trucks were rolled in immediately and the area was swept clean because Osama Been Hidin' had been found guilty in a lightning quick fashion and with absolutely no evidence. Again, why the rush to hustle the evidence out of there, which completely compromised the non-investigation?
And by the way, spoliation of evidence is a felony under New York State law. It is usually something which is done by the perpetrator or an accomplice for the obvious reason of avoiding prosecution.
Oh for Pete's sake ! The debris took until May 2002 to be cleared. For how many years was New York expected to live with every bit being " examined, logged and documented " ? It would still be going on now, and for what purpose exactly ?
Why do they reassemble whole planes after a crash?
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by mayabong
Why do they reassemble whole planes after a crash?
To determine the cause, when the cause and circumstances that led up to the cause are unknown.
Next?
I have shocking news for you - Jesus (if he ever existed) wasn't born on Dec.25 . Now go fact check that and while you're at it, read some history at least.
I recommend Carrol Quigley's "Tragedy and Hope", it's a long read, but well worth it. I can supply you with a scholarly book list if you wish.
in the US Christmas is generally celebrated on December 25
Originally posted by mayabong
reply to post by thedman
I just came across this video of the FF radios. Not much fire going on according to them.
Idiots will always side with Government
Originally posted by laiguana
Can you show another building that collapsed in a similar fashion to WTC7 that was not hit by a boeing 757?
What troubles me is that 9/11 conspiracy theorists are not the ones that have the burden of proof in this situation. It's easy to dismiss someone's theory or idea of what may have occurred considering they're not the ones with access to relevant data or any significant physical evidence that is likely available to federal agencies. The federal government who solicited these reports and the 9/11 commission so far has been the only one with the access to thoroughly investigate the collapse and the 9/11 incident all around, including internal activity before and after 9/11.
What 9/11 'conspiracy theorists' if you will, are simply in agreement with, is that these reports are not showing the whole story, nor is the evidence for their conclusion substantial. This would of course include their simulations and conclusions regarding hypothetical blast scenarios. And so this is where disagreement begins.
You might also want to note that while NIST is the prime contractor, they awarded analytical work to smaller contractors who were given the order not to make any conclusions about the collapse of WTC 7 based on the evidence that they found. This can be referenced in the SOW section of their awarded contracts.