It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not only am I suggesting it, it's an undisputed fact. That's how cameras work.
Originally posted by BrnBdry
I understand that. But surely youre not suggesting a dust particle on or within the camera itself would show up as a clear image on a photo of a clear image of something else thousands of miles away?
Originally posted by BrnBdry
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Yes, that is a wonderful fake EDITED animation someone made. look to my previous post.
Originally posted by MavRck
TO CAPTURE SCREEN-SHOT(S)
Go to the area that you want to take a screenshot of.
Once there, click the "print screen" button on your keyboard. This takes the screenshots.
Go to the "Paint" tool. Go to "edit" and then "Paste". There is your screenshot.
PS* For future reference, if you don't know how to do something...Google usually does.edit on 4-12-2010 by MavRck because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by chrismarco
reply to post by JonoEnglish
I believe you have to download the google earth moon viewer program here Google Earth
then you have to type in the coorndinates....not sure if you can just past them...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
It's not moon dust on the moon, it's earth dust inside the camera.
Originally posted by BrnBdry
If it was dust, I dont think youd be able to see it. If I'm taking an in focus picture of an object thousands of miles away, surely a dust particle on the lense wouldnt be visable at all in the photo.
Digital? Or film? These are film images and you probably won't see the same thing on most digital cameras, except for possibly SLRs. When you get dust near the focal plane of the camera, it will be in focus, that's why it's called the focal plane. The focal plane is also where the light rays coming through the lens converge to form a focused image.
Originally posted by BrnBdry
I have actually been dealing with cameras for roughly 15 years.
That "video" is a compilation of four images from NASA, feel free to download the same images from NASA yourself. I provided the link with all this information but apparently you didn't review the link.
your points thus far are made up of that such as for example 'its dust cause someone made this video of a superimposed piece of dust', or 'no sir'.
Originally posted by Phage
If you haven't seen other pictures then you didn't look at the other threads and you didn't bother looking at the original images. I you had, there are many other examples which you would have seen
Here's another: Here's what it looks like when Google is finished with it.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/ac7a8fb6a78a.jpg[/atsimg]
Giant Moon bug?
apollo.sese.asu.edu...
apollo.sese.asu.edu...
apollo.sese.asu.edu...
apollo.sese.asu.edu...
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d84fa289706e.gif[/atsimg]
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Here's a compilation of moon photos someone made showing another speck of dust:
Originally posted by BrnBdry
If it was dust, I dont think youd be able to see it.
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/d84fa289706e.gif[/atsimg]
Notice how it's always in the same spot in each frame? It's not on the moon, it's in the camera.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
To find this effect you need to look at original images, the ones that Google Moon is based on.
And as the object moves along, and the camera moves along, it just happens to coincide so perfectly as to end up in almost the exact same spot in the frame of the image each time?
Originally posted by BrnBdry
reply to post by Arbitrageur
In the post above I see your point as it is captured in 4 different spots. However, who's to say it wasn't captured in 4 different spots because it traveled along, and it was photographed repeatedly?
Well based on his last post trying to explain away why the "object" is in almost exactly the same place on 4 different images, I would now have to agree with you. I tried though.
Originally posted by MiTS65
Arbitrageur, you're wasting your time. The OP doesn't want to have anything explained. Save your breath.
It's not on the lens. It's near the focal plane of the camera. The clearer parts are closer to the film.
Originally posted by awcgs
It doesn't look remotely like dust on the lens to me.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
It's not on the lens. It's near the focal plane of the camera. The clearer parts are closer to the film.
Originally posted by awcgs
It doesn't look remotely like dust on the lens to me.