Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

reply to post by boondock-saint

Sorry, but our US Constitution does not
allow itself to be over written by a world
dominant entity.

And here was me thinking treaties over rule the constitution..
Am I wrong?

But then I guess you will tell me Soros wrote the proposed treaties also..

Originally posted by backinblack
And here was me thinking treaties over rule the constitution..
Am I wrong?

But then I guess you will tell me Soros wrote the proposed treaties also..

treaties do NOT over rule the Constitution.
They are there to supplement it.
If a treaty is signed that over rules
the Constitution, then it is an illegal
treaty and should be abolished
after the Revolution.

I don't care who wrote the treaties,
illegal is illegal.

reply to post by boondock-saint

treaties do NOT over rule the Constitution.
They are there to supplement it.
If a treaty is signed that over rules
the Constitution, then it is an illegal
treaty and should be abolished
after the Revolution.

I don't care who wrote the treaties,
illegal is illegal.

For once in this thread I agree with you but those in power don't..
And they write the rules and own the courts...

Originally posted by backinblack
For once in this thread I agree with you but those in power don't..
And they write the rules and own the courts...

they won't forever
even Rome fell
and I hear the fat lady
warming up

reply to post by MrXYZ


I put my money on the bet that Julian Assange is a patsy.
A useful clown like the wiki fan boys whose Robin Hoods antics keep us from real
issues and will possibly even lead us into believing that we
should engage in wars with Iran and Pakistan.

Add this to the fact that Assange is seemingly
untouchable to the CIA or the Pentagon and you have a case for Assange being in their pocket too.
Somewhere in that pea brain needs to understand
Assanges operation is closely related to/and financed by Soros,
the secretive hedge fund billionaire “Philanthropist” (wolf in sheep clothing)
because Soros is a man with many agendas and with an asset such as Assange to
help manipulate our perception of the reality with carefully
selected tid bits about people such as Hilary Clinton etc.
he might just be trying to achieve those agendas.

Originally posted by thecinic
I put my money on the bet that Julian Assange is a patsy.

well I would have to respectfully disagree.
In that latest Assange interview
with Frost. Julian stated his target
was closed societies. That leads me
to believe that he is not a patsy but
an active participant in this
attack on American Sovereignty.
He gave the same exact answer
as Soros would have given if asked
the same question IMO.

A closed society is also Soros'
target which is why he named
his organization Open Society
Institute.

Originally posted by thecinic
reply to post by MrXYZ

 

I put my money on the bet that Julian Assange is a patsy.
A useful clown like the wiki fan boys whose Robin Hoods antics keep us from real
issues and will possibly even lead us into believing that we
should engage in wars with Iran and Pakistan.

Add this to the fact that Assange is seemingly
untouchable to the CIA or the Pentagon and you have a case for Assange being in their pocket too.
Somewhere in that pea brain needs to understand
Assanges operation is closely related to/and financed by Soros,
the secretive hedge fund billionaire “Philanthropist” (wolf in sheep clothing)
because Soros is a man with many agendas and with an asset such as Assange to
help manipulate our perception of the reality with carefully
selected tid bits about people such as Hilary Clinton etc.
he might just be trying to achieve those agendas.

edit on 23-12-2010 by thecinic because: (no reason given)

So is Assange a mere patsy or involved.?
You keep swapping around..

Their is NO proof Wiki is financed by Soros, just a rumour that he MAY have donated to wikileaks..

Assange is untouchable because he hasn't broken any laws..
Nothing unusual about that..

reply to post by boondock-saint

well I would have to respectfully disagree.
In that latest Assange interview
with Frost. Julian stated his target
was closed societies. That leads me
to believe that he is not a patsy but
an active participant in this
attack on American Sovereignty.
He gave the same exact answer
as Soros would have given if asked
the same question IMO.

A closed society is also Soros'
target which is why he named
his organization Open Society
Institute.

Well lets hang them both...
Imagine being against a Closed Society..???

Main Entry: closed society
Part of Speech: n
Definition: a culture in which there is a rigid structure and little freedom or tolerance of belief, cf. open society

dictionary.reference.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint


Oh really?

Well now that puts him right in the middle of it all....

I would of liked to believe Assange was just using wiki leaks for his own fame and fortune.

With what you pointed out, he might be very well in on it which makes the whole situation worse.

Because if he knows the whole grand scheme of things, well imo he really should be hung.

Originally posted by backinblack
Assange is untouchable because he hasn't broken any laws..

lmao

round and round we go
here we go again on page 59
with repeated content.

I posted on umpteen pages ago
what Assange's charges would be.

edit to correct page #

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Assange is untouchable because he hasn't broken any laws..

lmao

round and round we go
here we go again on page 54
with repeated content.

I posted on umpteen pages ago
what Assange's charges would be.

Funny, the CIA,FBI,AFP and every other alphabet agency can't seem to find a charge and they have tried..
I'll send a letter to our PM telling her to look at p54..

You see thats the thing it is a opinion a swaying one at that if he is a patsy or truly involved.
Thats not the point....

What we KNOW which I think your starting to understand

That wiki leaks and Assange is a cover up for TPTB hidden agenda.

Thats the whole point getting you to understand wiki leak and assange with soros involved

is not this great savior to give us information to free us from the government.

WIKI LEAKS AND ASSANGE DON'T give two flips about you people..

If you finally understand that, then we can come to a consensus.

Originally posted by backinblack
Well lets hang them both...

oh black, lol
u know I won't be baited

oh and btw,
if we're gonna meet here every other night to
discuss this topic, at least u can do is bring
a bottle of Brandy or Rum. It's not polite to show
up at a party without a brown bag for the host.

Originally posted by boondock-saint
lmao

I posted on umpteen pages ago
what Assange's charges would be.

edit to correct page #

edit on 12/23/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)

You posted what you felt should be Assanges charges, however they are just your opinions.

The correct wording from you should be:

I posted on umpteen pages ago
what I feel Assange's charges should be.

Well when Assange is put away for good I'm sure he wont be lonely

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/bebcec063bc8.jpg[/atsimg]

[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/b2825f36e649.jpg[/atsimg]

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Well lets hang them both...

oh black, lol
u know I won't be baited

oh and btw,
if we're gonna meet here every other night to
discuss this topic, at least u can do is bring
a bottle of Brandy or Rum. It's not polite to show
up at a party without a brown bag for the host.

edit on 12/23/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)

Hey, you're the host of this fancy dress party..
You supply the grog...
After a few I might start believing your tales.

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
The correct wording from you should be:

I posted on umpteen pages ago
what I feel Assange's charges should be.

it doesn't really matter what i think or not,
wiki and assange is doing exactly what
Obama and Soros wants him to do, so
I doubt there is even a formal investigation
into the criminal matter from the DOJ or the DOD.
And if there is, then it will be just about as
worthy of a review as the 9/11 Omission Report
was.

reply to post by boondock-saint


BinB said Assange is untouchable because he hasn't broken any laws, then you said you allready stated what laws he has broken.

I was just pointing out that, again, that was just your opinion.
He hasn't broken any laws just because you feel so.

Originally posted by thecinic
You see thats the thing it is a opinion a swaying one at that if he is a patsy or truly involved.
Thats not the point....

What we KNOW which I think your starting to understand

That wiki leaks and Assange is a cover up for TPTB hidden agenda.

Thats the whole point getting you to understand wiki leak and assange with soros involved

is not this great savior to give us information to free us from the government.

WIKI LEAKS AND ASSANGE DON'T give two flips about you people..

If you finally understand that, then we can come to a consensus.

You're confusing "knowing" with "making up completely random stuff without evidence". All you're doing is repeating talking points by scumbag talkshow hosts who've been proven to lie (*cough*Beck*cough*) while completely ignoring all evidence that contradicts you...not that you care about evidence in the first place, you never provided any for your accusations.

reply to post by thecinic


But.... Didn't you say he wasn't going to be arrested because he is protected by TPTB and the NWO?

Oh well, that's still such a strong argument that I feel really subdued by it....