Wikileaks Exposed - The man behind the NWO Curtain

reply to post by FalselyFlagged


My dear friend let me help you.

Me and many others have tried to show the OP the error of his ways he has made the choice to maintain ignorant. You me and just about everyone else on this site know that what the OP has wrote is basically a lie, its simply not true if he makes the choice to remain ignorant its up to him there is nothing you or i can do about it.

Therefore it’s probably for the best you don’t say anything else to him and let this thread die. If there truly is a man with a white beard floating on a cloud his other threads will have a similar fate.

Originally posted by kevinunknown
Me and many others have tried to show the OP the error of his ways he has made the choice to maintain ignorant.

but you have not given one iota of evidence
to discredit the evidence that I have posted.
The only thing u do is attack me by calling
me a liar and hoping all my threads die.

Here's a news flash for ya:

The truth will NEVER die

related NWO article on ATS:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by boondock-saint


If the truth will never die, then why are you so intent on people disregarding the cablegate files? But then you say you aren't. In reality that's what you're telling people to do, whether you realize it or not.

How can you think they are good and evil at the same time? Tell me truthfully, have you even been reading them, or atleast the daily updates by sources like the Guardian? If you had, you would be dissapointed to find out that it doesn't fit your preconcieved notion.

The reality of the situation is that only .5% have been released. Your predictions are on par with the other bogus threads on ATS from people that claim to be clairvoyant. You are just another person making assumptions. Your "evidence" is extremely weak.

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
why are you so intent on people disregarding the cablegate files? But then you say you aren't. In reality that's what you're telling people to do, whether you realize it or not.

damn, can't u read ???

I have already stated the cables are real and truthful.
By all means .... read them !!!
But just know, u are not seeing ALL
the dirt out there. U r only seeing what dirt
is needed to accomplish the NWO agenda.

What I am saying is, that the cables released
are targeting foes of the NWO. That makes it blackmail
and extortion. The people who fall in line with the
NWO or pay up are eliminated from the cable releases.

wikileaks = non-NWO political cleansing through blackmail and extortion

reply to post by boondock-saint

So it's that scumbag Soros in with the CIA and NWO that control Wiki.

BUT, you say the cables are all real..

I have already stated the cables are real and truthful.

Why would you assume that??

BTW, you say Israel paid them off but I have seen many damaging cables relating to Israel.
Just don't look to MSM to find them, but they ARE there..

Kinda puts doubt to your Israel claim....

Originally posted by backinblack
So no credible proof Julian hacked into US military or are you prepared to admit you were wrong??

No, I am not wrong.
U want proof Assange hacked into
US Military computers??
Well here is Assange himself
saying that had access to US Military
Network for over 2 yrs through a backdoor.
watch from about 4:00 to 4:15 of this
documentary and it will come out of his
own mouth.

reply to post by boondock-saint


How is exposing the CIA's / military's attrocities and secret wars "furthering the NWO agenda"? Answer me that.

So now you think the CIA's attrocities and failures (like their failed propaganda campaign in Saudi Arabia) should be covered up to stop the NWO agenda? Is that your solution?

Get real. Your standpoint makes absolutely no sense. And how the hell do you know that stuff is censored from the cables? They have only released .5%, genius. Like I said, you are no better than those on ATS who claim to be clairvoyants and predict crazy things. You have no more "evidence" than them.

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
How is exposing the CIA's / military's attrocities and secret wars "furthering the NWO agenda"? Answer me that.

u r not reading the thread.

yes, cables were released on CIA atrocities
but that info in those cables were already
exposed by the MSM up to a yr ago
(I already posted videos in this thread). So
wiki releasing them is nothing new other
than the fact that it makes it appear as though
wiki is not playing favorites.

reply to post by boondock-saint

No, I am not wrong.
U want proof Assange hacked into
US Military computers??
Well here is Assange himself
saying that had access to US Military
Network for over 2 yrs through a backdoor.
watch from about 4:00 to 4:15 of this
documentary and it will come out of his
own mouth.

Yes, he admitted to it YEARS later in a book...

What you are saying is that he was caught doing it and hence he was blackmailed into working for the CIA or go to jail...

Where your theory blows up in your faces is simple.....
If what you say is true then his hacking into these US sites was kept secret during his trial back in 1992,
Why then would the CIA allow him to publish a book a few years later admitting to these crime??
It wouldn't help their cause and would actually throw suspicion on their prime employee...

Though I'm sure you will find some way to again twist the facts..

Originally posted by boondock-saint
more evidence of the CIA being involved in
this wikileaks operation.

On Friday, BoingBoing reported on the CIA hosting a server that has the Wikileaks cables.

“Looks like the CIA created a ‘honeypot’ wikileaks mirror at wikileaks.psytek.net, presumably to see who is downloading the leaks – but they screwed up the anonymization,” writes Xeni Jardin. “A quick Google reveals who’s behind psytek.net. Wonder what other mirrors they set up, but with better cloaking?”

www.infowars.com...

related ATS thread:
www.abovetopsecret.com...


Now why in the world would the CIA set up a mirror
of the wikileaks cables?

to help wikileaks distribute the cables? or
get IP addresses of the folks who download? or
BOTH ????

either way, this is a direct link from wikileaks to the CIA.

more from the article link above

On the psytek.net website we find the following: “I am the admin of psytek.net and I have just come online to tell you what I have found, after receiving a phonecall from a close friend when he saw my domain was linked to the CIA via Wikileaks.”

Yes, I decided to run a Wikileaks mirror last weekend as way of participating and helping keep information free and ultimately human freedom.

Upon closer analysis over the last few hours it appears my site has been compromised by CIA operatives who have attempted to discover the source of the Wikileaks mirror source.

I do not know how successful they were, only that they did manage to log all incoming traffic. Including inbound web traffic of users inside the United States trying to view the Wikileaks mirror.

edit on 12/12/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)

I know I am not supposed to post here

But this one was to tempting as I know how much you like proof

BoingBoing Confirms: Wikileaks mirror not CIA, sorry.

But, of course, this is just NWO propaganda from the resident paid disinfo agents here on ATS

I will leave you alone again now Boon, have fun.

Originally posted by backinblack
Why then would the CIA allow him to publish a book a few years later admitting to these crime??
It wouldn't help their cause and would actually throw suspicion on their prime employee...

Though I'm sure you will find some way to again twist the facts..

just ask Robert Steele, former CIA Agent.
u can put a lot of stuff about the CIA in
ur book as long as they approve of it first.

allowing Assange to admit to hacking the
US Military in 1991 allowed a huge budget
to be implemented to combat it.

reply to post by boondock-saint


You're a liar. When has there been any proof of a secret bombing campaign in Yemen? Where has it been in the MSM that CIA abducted an innocent German then used diplomatic pressure to get Germany to drop the case against the 13 agents? Where has it been in the MSM that DynCorp used tax payer money to hold parties that pimp off Afghan boys? Where has it EVER been in the MSM that there are secret troops implanted as foot soldiers in Pakistan. Where has it ever been reported in the media that the CIA has a $500M / per year propaganda campaign in Saudi Arabia that is an outright failure, and the Letterman is doing more than they are?

All you have done is set up a complete STRAW man and then proceded to knock it down (I was never claiming that secret CIA prisons was the issue being outted by the cables.. you made that up and then knocked it down). But now you are LYING if you say all of these other things were already outted by the MSM. Outright lies.

Originally posted by SkurkNilsen
BoingBoing Confirms: Wikileaks mirror not CIA, sorry.
But, of course, this is just NWO propaganda from the resident paid disinfo agents here on ATS

I will leave you alone again now Boon, have fun.

a quote from ur page link

"CIA wikileaks mirror honeypot" that revealed itself as likely having been set up by the CIA. It wasn't. It was some guy's joke or something.

ok, now is this fishy or what?
Xeni prints retraction but has no idea
why it is a retraction???
Normally, if there is a retraction,
there is a reason given for it.
In this case, there is none.
Highly suspect right there.

To Me: Sounds like CIA damage control.

reply to post by boondock-saint

allowing Assange to admit to hacking the
US Military in 1991 allowed a huge budget
to be implemented to combat it.

Show me one shred of proof that he was CAUGHT hacking into US military sites Boon.
Saying he did it years later is NOT proof of being caught, unless you have him on vid saying he was caught..

reply to post by boondock-saint

To Me: Sounds like CIA damage control.

ATM Boon, a nursery rhyme would sound like CIA to you

Originally posted by FalselyFlagged
You're a liar. When has there been any proof of a secret bombing campaign in Yemen? Where has it been in the MSM that CIA abducted an innocent German then used diplomatic pressure to get Germany to drop the case against the 13 agents? Where has it been in the MSM that DynCorp used tax payer money to hold parties that pimp off Afghan boys? Where has it EVER been in the MSM that there are secret troops implanted as foot soldiers in Pakistan. Where has it ever been reported in the media that the CIA has a $500M / per year propaganda campaign in Saudi Arabia that is an outright failure, and the Letterman is doing more than they are?

frankly I just don't have the time to research
every lie you mention but I will address a few of them.

2003 - Dyncorp - 7 yrs before wiki cable release
www.historycommons.org...

2009 - more Dyncorp - 18 months before wiki release
crooksandliars.com...

2010 - Sept - CIA Boots in Pakistan - 2 months before wiki releases
www.informationclearinghouse.info...

2009 - US Attacks in Yemen - 1 yr before wiki releases
www.washingtonpost.com...

and here

wordpress

now who has the straw man argument?
Dude u need to do research before
opening ur yap and spreading ur lies.
What I said is true

so don't call me a liar

the wiki cables about the CIA are OLD news.
And are only appearing now in the cables to
make the public think that the CIA is not part
of this Psy-Op. And it seems to be working,
they had you fooled per your outburst
directed at me.

grow up and investigate

Originally posted by backinblack
Show me one shred of proof that he was CAUGHT hacking into US military sites Boon.

because he's working on this wikileaks Psy-Op
and it funded by Soros and implemented under
CIA. That's all the proof I need.

A prime example of someone who did not cave
in to work for the CIA is Gary McKinnon.

Gary has been in prison for 9 yrs awaiting
extradition to US for the very same crimes
Assange got off with a fine and freedom.

en.wikipedia.org...

So how is it that Assange is free from those crimes
and McKinnon is not ???

Originally posted by boondock-saint

Originally posted by backinblack
Show me one shred of proof that he was CAUGHT hacking into US military sites Boon.

because he's working on this wikileaks Psy-Op
and it funded by Soros and implemented under
CIA. That's all the proof I need./quote]
So you have NO proof then...

A prime example of someone who did not cave
in to work for the CIA is Gary McKinnon.

Gary has been in prison for 9 yrs awaiting
extradition to US for the very same crimes
Assange got off with a fine and freedom.

So how is it that Assange is free
and McKinnon is not ???

That's simple Boon...There is ZERO proof that Assange was EVER caught hacking into the US military..
That's why McKinnon is in Jail and Assange is not...

Prove me wrong, and I do mean PROVE..!!!
No BS assumptions or concocted scenarios, real PROOF Boon...

reply to post by boondock-saint


Because it was mentioned on some two-bit websites you claim it was common, officiated knowledge? Now it is.

The war on terror is openly a failure. An admitted failure. Why would the CIA want that? You are still a liar.

Originally posted by backinblack
That's simple Boon...There is ZERO proof that Assange was EVER caught hacking into the US military..
That's why McKinnon is in Jail and Assange is not...

Prove me wrong, and I do mean PROVE..!!!
No BS assumptions or concocted scenarios, real PROOF Boon...

Assange on video stating that he penetrated
US Military networks is a confession and therefore
proof in any court in the world.

And he is not in prison for that confession.
That is proof.

When Ted Bundy admitting killing people
on his video taped confession it was used
as evidence in his trial and he was convicted.

Why is Assange NOT in prison already ???
He already admitted to the crimes.

He's not in prison cuz he works for them.