It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by talisman
I am not going anywhere. Well I can't stomach the disinfo from Wiki, I can call it for what it is. Up and until they release something that is truly "earth shattering" then they deserve to be criticized for their bogus proclamations. These look to me to be carefully planned and thought out releases and will in the end only serve the interest of the United States.
So there is "more" coming, but I see no reason to trust them at this point. They have not earned that trust due to the fact that they have continually bragged about the information they were sitting on.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
as we say on ATS :::::::
your proof ?????
During the Cold War, the U.S. limited Soviet officials' freedom to travel to a 25-mile radius around the U.N. headquarters building. The Soviets used it to great effect, erecting a massive listening station in its U.N. mission, and purchasing an apartment complex for Russian diplomats in the Bronx and a beach mansion on Long Island for visitors and vacationing Russian diplomats.
...
Russia is by no means the only country that spies at the United Nations. The United States and Britain have long collected information on the positions of U.N. members.
...
For decades, the Federal Bureau of Investigation has run a massive counterintelligence operation out of Manhattan, which monitors foreign spying operations by U.N.-based agents from Russia and many other countries. Periodically, the bureau expels some. In October 1986, the United States asked 55 Soviet diplomats to leave the country, including "operatives for intercepting communications," the New York Times reported.
Originally posted by wcitizen
Originally posted by WanderingThe3rd
Someone help me answer this i'm very confused....
If all these big countries dont like wikileaks, just like America... why is it still up? it would be hacked.. shut down.. and taken off...
am i the only one who thinks they want it to be running?
or is there something someones isn't telling me?
Why are you assuming that every other country's Government has the same beliefs about Wikileaks as the US Government? Not all governments seek to annihilate those they don't like.
secondedit on 28-11-2010 by wcitizen because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by zero1020
Can you show proof that Obama is a servant of the House of Saud or is this just your opinion?
Originally posted by SourGrapes
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Saudi King says
The world needs Obama
www.guardian.co.uk...
Oh my !!!
I wonder why he would say that ???
Because Obama works for the House of Saud. His cover, and the Saudi's cover, is up. These cables will ultimately be Obama's undoing. This was a controlled release, by the U.S. military, to expose the 'truth'. That 'truth' being the current administration was a coup of the American government. This was the only way that the U.S. military could expose what is really going on.
The clock has just sped up, 10 fold. Expect some very serious repercussions. The House of Saud, and the current administration will not go down quietly. This is the beginning of the 'breaking point'. You've got to decide, very quickly, which side you believe and which side you'll stand behind and fight for.
This episode could be the deciding factor of whether America lives, or dies.
Good thing there are laws preventing the government from just censoring everything they deem unworthy of the public's eye. Illegal downloads are not even in the same category as freedom of speech. Plus this guy isn't even American so our laws do not apply to him.
Originally posted by RadoSky
reply to post by Wide-Eyes
It's funny how a site like Wikileaks can cause a national security headache for the United States but, when it comes to illegal downloading, Oh you betcha! websites will be taken down very quickly. Napster, ISOHunt, Kazza, etc even Piratebay has had it's fair share of issues... Yet, Julian Assinage can come through town like a sheriff and wipe his butt with the United States? Seriously! This is nothing but a joke! If this were a real threat or National Security issue, United States would immediately ban DNS services to Wikileaks... You don't need to shut down the website or hack it, just make all ISP's in the United States filter the DNS services... Um kinda like a VPN service... Hmmm i wonder if I.T for the United States have thought about this. Bottom line, I think that is nothing but a PR stunt for Wikileaks. United States keeps it's confidental data very secure... How about some UFO files Wikileaks? Try and get those! Was Corsoe telling the truth? .............................
ISP's are the train conductors, if they don't want you to see something, they wont stop! Filter the DNS already and move on!
America was founded on the idea that we would not interfere with other nation's problems but we seem to have forgotten that and decided to become the world police. I agree that the best bet would be to withdraw a large amount of our forces to protect our country until things calm down. But I'm not a military strategist so maybe I'm just spouting stupid ideas.
Originally posted by the2ofusr1
Can you blame them ..I sure wouldn't ...I think the safest place for the US army is protecting the homeland ,defensively ....Right now the US has put itself in a place where they most of their military .Ships as sitting ducks .Bases and equipment easily reached by the worlds only super power,China as well as their friends,and I may be wrong but China Iran and Russia make some very good friends ..
THIS IS FUNNY. Good one.
Originally posted by Plan2exist18
Originally posted by wcitizen
A comment from Twitter:
"US Government is just about to find out what it feels like to go through a nudie-scanner. #cablegate"
Haha I hope im not the only one who thinks this is hilarious haha classic
Lets hope the next dump comes soon and has more for us. (no homo)
Originally posted by boondock-saint
reply to post by Tsuki-no-Hikari
The Russkies didn't tap all network infrastructure.
The Russkies didn't require biometric data.
The Russkies didn't require fingerprints.
The Russkies didn't seek personal info including passwords and credit cards
u cannot compare the 2
edit on 11/28/2010 by boondock-saint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by the2ofusr1
Can you blame them ..I sure wouldn't ...I think the safest place for the US army is protecting the homeland ,defensively ....Right now the US has put itself in a place where they most of their military .Ships as sitting ducks .Bases and equipment easily reached by the worlds only super power,China as well as their friends,and I may be wrong but China Iran and Russia make some very good friends ..
this is a reply to boondog-saint
Now this is where your tax dollars go america, to fund sick people like this. I hope the peoples over there do him a quick justice. Why do we fund things like this? WHY, so some fat cat can ripp jo the taxpayer off. MONEY FUNNELING TO A NUT JOB, for what reason? To get rid of what?
Originally posted by randomname
i don't find it shocking karzai is driven by paranoia. as soon as the u.s. pulls out you'll find him hanging in the town square.
he's a corrupt crook who has been funnelling u.s. aid money into private bank accounts instead of building schools, hospitals and the economy.