It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Black_Fox
Wrong question. It's not what an average person can do about it.
It's what the average people can do about it. We've been divided for a long time.
People coming together with a voice and trying to make changes makes me proud to be an American.
Oct. 26, in Russia's leading daily newspaper, Kommersant, WikiLeaks spokesman Kristinn Hrafnsson said that "Russian readers will learn a lot about their country" after one of the site's upcoming document dumps. "We want to tell people the truth about the actions of their governments."
In response, the State Department began notifying its outposts, asking them to identify documents that could contain embarrassing or sensitive material, such as candid assessments of foreign heads of state or governments.
"This is serious. These are classified cables for a reason," said department spokesman Philip J. Crowley. "Implicit in these relationships [with other countries] is trust. We're going to test that trust."
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Leaks happen because someone has something to gain from that release.
Now, who has something to gain, that may not be as obvious as one would think.
In any case, it's likely that China as a whole – whether the government or its people – is now a very substantial buyer of silver, indeed, possibly to a greater extent than gold. Thus, a rundown in People's Bank of China holdings of US Treasuries could be readily accounted for by purchases of gold for its own account and of silver to supply to the Chinese public.
David Lew, a keen gold market follower and bullion analyst, says there are several reasons why China is not buying gold from IMF, though there have been rumors that the Chinese central bank was planning to buy the entire 191.3 tonnes of gold from IMF.
First and foremost is the fact that gold market in the world will turn into an immediate playground of speculation and excessive volatility if China is to buy gold from IMF. "Even rumors that China was buying IMF gold two months back turned the bullion market highly volatile," points out Lew.
China has a relatively small position as far as gold reserves are concerned. The Chinese central bank--the People's Bank of China--holds only 1,054 tons of gold, amounting to just 1.2% of the country's gross domestic product. The large chunk of China's reserves--around 70%--are held in US dollars.
Secondly, Lew says the fact that China is not jumping into to buy IMF gold does not mean that the country is not interested in amassing gold reserves. "It looks China is buying gold these days from gold mines, rather than gold bullion. Clearly, China wants to balance its gold reserve position very carefully and meticulously," he pointed out.
Originally posted by Jakes51
Why another US release? I thought they were kicking around the idea of releasing sensitive documents about the Russian and Chinese governments?
...It seems the only turkey that is to be devoured this Thanksgiving is once again the United States?
Now, it seems these documents are of a diplomatic nature and are communications between governments? Not only would the US be at risk, but so would the nations they are dealing with when these state secrets are divulged to every Tom, Dick, and Harry. While some will have residue of Cheetoos on their bellies and a remote control in their laps, but others may partake in more sinister undertakings. Hopefully nothing bad comes from this latest release, and no one gets hurt or worse . . .
Information is great, and government needs to be held accountable for its actions, but this organization thinks it can give up the family jewels when ever it wishes? Furthermore, we have yet to see the consequences of their past releases. What happened to Russia and China as being the focus of Wikileaks? What they have cold feet when it comes down to airing out their dirty laundry? To me, it seems the US is being singled out with all of these recent releases? We shall see what juicy tidbits comes out from this latest release from the National Inquirer of international affairs.
Originally posted by LadySkadi
Leaks happen because someone has something to gain from that release.
Now, who has something to gain, that may not be as obvious as one would think.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
however, if and when wiki decides to start releasing documents for other major countries showing their dirty moves...will the people suddenly start not liking wikileaks? will turnabout be fair play?
In another Twiiter message, one reader suggests that the leaks would contain the UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) reports, which the Pentagon is not making open despite repeated pleas from the pro-UFO forums.
On its part, WikiLeaks said, "The Pentagon is hyperventilating again over fears of being held to account."