It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrRagnarok
the grays arnt biological they are ai constructed of synthetic compounds.
et wont be biological it will be ai,only primitive civs remain in bio form across the civs strata.
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
With you all the way Mr Mask...
I sit here with a look of total astonishment that anyone can claim to have so much world shattering material but the only place they can use it is on a forum often frequented by people with 'odd' behavior shall we say. You know so much but only us mere mortals may be privy to this groundbreaking knowledge. You can't take it to the TV because you are in fear of your life but blab about it loudly on here.
The reason you don't take it to a TV channel etc is for the simple reason they would laugh themselves silly..
I have said it many times before, stop with the 'my inside contact says', stop with the 'I'm in contact with x, y or z', stop with the claims of knowing amazing information...
Stop already.
If you can't back it up then it's pointless, just the same as any UFO report, it's all anecdotal, but when you make such intense claims of contact or evidence either put up or shut up. It may impress some but its just noise interfering in a thread at best.edit on 22-11-2010 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
With you all the way Mr Mask...
I sit here with a look of total astonishment that anyone can claim to have so much world shattering material but the only place they can use it is on a forum often frequented by people with 'odd' behavior shall we say. You know so much but only us mere mortals may be privy to this groundbreaking knowledge. You can't take it to the TV because you are in fear of your life but blab about it loudly on here.
edit on 22-11-2010 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)
Somehow is understandable your point of view, but contacts or abductions don't work like that. Since it's irrelevant for them if people will believe you, they doesn't provide evidence to support your experience. Experiences of this type are personal, to share them is an open option and you will be 100% responsable for any consequences of that.
For them, there is absolutly no need to be believed or confirmed, in their level of conscience is almost no ego. Ego makes you feell the need to be believed. They come to do whatever their job is and that's it.edit on 22-11-2010 by Trueman because: fix text
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
Originally posted by Trueman
Originally posted by Mclaneinc
With you all the way Mr Mask...
I sit here with a look of total astonishment that anyone can claim to have so much world shattering material but the only place they can use it is on a forum often frequented by people with 'odd' behavior shall we say. You know so much but only us mere mortals may be privy to this groundbreaking knowledge. You can't take it to the TV because you are in fear of your life but blab about it loudly on here.
edit on 22-11-2010 by Mclaneinc because: (no reason given)
Somehow is understandable your point of view, but contacts or abductions don't work like that. Since it's irrelevant for them if people will believe you, they doesn't provide evidence to support your experience. Experiences of this type are personal, to share them is an open option and you will be 100% responsable for any consequences of that.
For them, there is absolutly no need to be believed or confirmed, in their level of conscience is almost no ego. Ego makes you feell the need to be believed. They come to do whatever their job is and that's it.edit on 22-11-2010 by Trueman because: fix text
I'm not so much on at the abduction cases or the UFO reports, I myself have seen 2 ufo's and as you rightly say I don't care who believes me or not. Saying that there are people who wade into a debate stating clear allegations but yet fail to explain how they know such details, a simple 'I was abducted' would help loads but for some reason many don't want to be classed as abduction cases because it makes them look foolish.
Well that's my opinion, by already blabbing you know ETs have no x y or z they should remember they are already in the possibly look silly box.
The people I most become annoyed about are not the above, for me it's the 'I have an inside source' or the 'I'm a top security clearance whatever'.
Those words so irritate a serious conservation because you know theres a very likely chance it comes from someone claiming to be something they are not, call me old fashioned but do we really think that a 5 star General is going to pop on to ATS and chat to us, do we really think that a person of such high clearance is going to jeopardize their position but having chats with us.
I mean in all fairness do people really think that's likely, the only time you might get some sort of dialog from them is when they are most likely at the end of their life and they won't do it on here, it will be 2nd hand info.
Again I use the words put up or # up in those cases, if you apparently have the balls to come here and make statements about your knowledge then have the decency to prove it to the site owners at least.
For me it's like saying because I chat with the local post man that I have insider knowledge of the UK postal service.
Originally posted by Mr Mask
Originally posted by loves a conspiricy
reply to post by HazyChestNutz
and how do you know this???
Can you provide us with some proof of your claims???
A simple....im an alien BS wont cut it im afraid
Anyone can claim any nonsense with no proof
You are very right...lets start denying ignorance right here and now before this entire thread slips deeper into the realm of lies/misconceptions/baseless-guess-work and invented detail.
1) THERE IS NO evidence of alien Greys existing other then the "words" of a small handful of people, mostly whom are either "proven scammers", mentally ill or not creditable.
2) Debating about the biology of Santa and the Easter Bunny would be easier due to knowing the biology of humans and rabbits. Guessing about Greys is one thing...but logging on to ATS to basically lie or throw around bunk-science "while acting factual or informed" is another...and frankly, its dishonest as well.
3) There is probably no Greys...and if there ARE, nobody here will have the slightest idea about the biology of said creature. Anyone telling you they "do 100% know" the answer to the OP's questions "is lying" or "unknowingly misinformed"...or possibly mentally ill.
4) It is silly to expect a TRUTHFUL answer to this thread no matter the truth behind the Grey's existence.
With all that said...enjoy your thread and the types who flock to it.
TRY to keep it real...
MMedit on 22-11-2010 by Mr Mask because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LightofLiberty
My brother mentioned that he read in the Day After Roswell by Col. Phillip Corso that the greys have no reproductive organs or digestive system. Assuming this is correct, how do they reproduce, perhaps via cloning or genetic engineering? Furthermore, how have they evolved beyond the need for these two functions that are critical to humanity but seemingly not critical for the greys? What are your thoughts on this?
Thank you,
LightofLiberty
Question: "Are angels male or female?" Answer: The Bible does not necessarily support the idea of angels being male or female. Whenever gender is specifically “assigned” to an angel in Scripture, it is male (Genesis 19:10-12; Revelation 7:2; 8:3; 10:7). However, this does not necessarily indicate that angels are male. Matthew 22:30 seems to indicate that angels are “sexless,” without gender: “At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.” If angels do not procreate, there is no need for gender, at least not in the sense of human gender distinctions. In a similar manner, God always refers to Himself in masculine language, although God is neither male nor female. God uses masculine language when He speaks of Himself because it more adequately describes who He is and what He does, especially in the patriarchal cultures in which the Bible was written. If angels do have a gender in some form, Scripture would indicate that they are predominately or universally male. It is more likely that angels are genderless, just as God is, and that masculine language is used to describe them and their role in serving God.